Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
5 "Risk assessment"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Research Paper
Psychometric Properties of the Fall Risk Perception Questionnaire-Short Version for Inpatients in Acute Care Hospitals
Choi, Jeeeun , Lee, Sujin , Park, Eunjin , Ku, Sangha , Kim, Sunhwa , Yu, Wonhye , Jeong, Eunmi , Park, Sukhee , Park, Yusun , Kim, Hye Young , Kim, Sung Reul
J Korean Acad Nurs 2024;54(2):151-161.   Published online May 31, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.23127
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Patients’ perception of fall risk is a promising new indicator for fall prevention. Therefore, a fall risk perception questionnaire that can be used rapidly and repeatedly in acute care settings is required. This study aimed to develop a short version of the fall risk perception questionnaire (Short-FRPQ) for inpatients.
Methods
For the psychometric measurements, 246 inpatients were recruited from an acute care hospital. The construct (using confirmatory factor analysis and discriminant validity of each item), convergent, and known-group validities were tested to determine the validity of the Short-FRPQ. McDonald’s omega coefficient was used to examine the internal consistency of reliability.
Results
In the confirmatory factor analysis, the fit indices of the Short-FRPQ, comprising 14 items and three factors, appeared to be satisfactory. The Short-FRPQ had a significantly positive correlation with the original scale, the Korean Falls Efficacy Scale-International, and the Morse Fall Scale. The risk of falls group, assessed using the Morse Fall Scale, had a higher score on the Short-FRPQ. McDonald’s omega coefficient was .90.
Conclusion
The Short-FRPQ presents good reliability and validity. As patient participation is essential in fall interventions, evaluating the fall risk perception of inpatients quickly and repeatedly using scales of acceptable validity and reliability is necessary.
  • 268 View
  • 24 Download
Close layer
Original Articles
A Comparative Study on the Predictive Validity among Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales
Young Hee Lee, Ihn Sook Jeong, Seong Sook Jeon
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2003;33(2):162-169.   Published online March 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2003.33.2.162
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study was to compare the predictive validity of Norton Scale(1962), Cubbin & Jackson Scale(1991), and Song & Choi Scale(1991).

Method

Data were collected three times per week from 48-72hours after admission based on the four pressure sore risk assessment scales and a skin assessment tool for pressure sore on 112 intensive care unit(ICU) patients in a educational hospital Ulsan during Dec, 11, 2000 to Feb, 10, 2001. Four indices of validity and area under the curve(AUC) of receiver operating characteristic(ROC) were calculated.

Result

Based on the cut off point presented by the developer, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value were as follows : Norton Scale : 97%, 18%, 35%, 93% respectively; Cubbin & Jackson Scale : 89%, 61%, 51%, 92%, respectively; and Song & Choi Scale : 100%, 18%, 36%, 100% respectively. Area under the curves(AUC) of receiver operating characteristic(ROC) were Norton Scale .737, Cubbin & Jackson Scale .826, Song & Choi Scale .683.

Conclusion

The Cubbin & Jackson Scale was found to be the most valid pressure sore risk assessment tool. Further studies on patients with chronic conditions may be helpful to validate this finding.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Patient-Level Fall Risk Prediction Using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership’s Common Data Model: Pilot Feasibility Study
    Hyesil Jung, Sooyoung Yoo, Seok Kim, Eunjeong Heo, Borham Kim, Ho-Young Lee, Hee Hwang
    JMIR Medical Informatics.2022; 10(3): e35104.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta‐Analysis
    Min Wei, Ling Wu, Yan Chen, Qiaomei Fu, Wenyue Chen, Dongliang Yang
    Nursing in Critical Care.2020; 25(3): 165.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales among Patients in a Trauma Intensive Care Unit
    Ja Eun Choi, Sun-Kyung Hwang
    Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing.2019; 12(2): 26.     CrossRef
  • Testing the Predictive Validity of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model
    Hyesil Jung, Hyeoun-Ae Park
    Western Journal of Nursing Research.2018; 40(12): 1785.     CrossRef
  • Automated Pressure Injury Risk Assessment System Incorporated Into an Electronic Health Record System
    Yinji Jin, Taixian Jin, Sun-Mi Lee
    Nursing Research.2017; 66(6): 462.     CrossRef
  • Longitudinal Evaluation of Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool and Nurses' Experience
    Eun Young Hur, Yinji Jin, Taixian Jin, Sun-Mi Lee
    Journal of Nursing Care Quality.2017; 32(3): 242.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Tools for Elderly
    Seong-Hi Park, Young-Shin Lee, Young-Mi Kwon
    Western Journal of Nursing Research.2016; 38(4): 459.     CrossRef
  • A Meta-analysis of the Timed Up and Go test for Predicting Falls
    Seong-Hi Park, On-Seok Lee
    Quality Improvement in Health Care.2016; 22(2): 27.     CrossRef
  • Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk in hospitalized patients
    Seong-Hi Park, Yun-Kyoung Choi, Chang-Bum Kang
    Journal of Tissue Viability.2015; 24(3): 102.     CrossRef
  • Validation of Fall Risk Assessment Scales among Hospitalized Patients in South Korea using Retrospective Data Analysis
    Young Ok Kang, Rhayun Song
    Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2015; 27(1): 29.     CrossRef
  • Validity of the Morse Fall Scale implemented in an electronic medical record system
    Seonhyeon Baek, Jinshi Piao, Yinji Jin, Sun‐Mi Lee
    Journal of Clinical Nursing.2014; 23(17-18): 2434.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and Associated Factors of Pressure Ulcers in Newborns
    Won-Young Choi, Hyeon-Ok Ju
    Journal of Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing.2012; 18(4): 177.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Bayesian Network Model Using Electronic Patient Records for Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers
    In Sook Cho, Eunja Chung
    Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2011; 41(3): 423.     CrossRef
  • Braden Scale: evaluation of clinical usefulness in an intensive care unit
    InSook Cho, Maengseok Noh
    Journal of Advanced Nursing.2010; 66(2): 293.     CrossRef
  • 84 View
  • 2 Download
  • 14 Crossref
Close layer
Optimal Time Interval for Position Change for ICU Patients using Foam Mattress Against Pressure Ulcer Risk
Hyean Jeong Kim, In Sook Jeong
J Korean Acad Nurs 2012;42(5):730-737.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.5.730
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study was done to identify the time interval to pressure ulcer and to determine the optimal time interval for position change depending on pressure ulcer risk in patients using foam mattress in intensive care units.

Methods

The Braden scale score, occurrence of pressure ulcers and position change intervals were assessed with 56 patients admitted to an intensive care unit from April to November, 2011. The time to pressure ulcer occurrence by Braden scale risk group was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log rank test. Then, the optimal time interval for position change was calculated with ROC curve.

Results

The median time to pressure ulcer occurrence was 5 hours at mild or moderate risk, 3.5 hours at high risk and 3 hours at very high risk on the Braden scale. The optimal time interval for position change was 3 hours at mild and moderate risk, 2 hours at high and very high risk of Braden scale.

Conclusion

When foam mattresses are used a slight extension of the time interval for position change can be considered for the patients with mild or moderate pressure ulcer risk but not for patients with high or very high pressure ulcer risk by Braden scale.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The effect of support surface on the prevention of pressure injury in acute care settings: A multi-center prospective observational study
    Mi-Ock Shim, Chul-Gyu Kim, Ja Kyung Min, So Yeon Kwak, Hyunhee Ghil, Seungmi Park
    Journal of Tissue Viability.2024; 33(4): 652.     CrossRef
  • Predicting the cut‐off point for interface pressure in pressure injury according to the standard hospital mattress and polyurethane foam mattress as support surfaces
    Mi Yu, Kyung Hee Park, Jiseon Shin, Ji Hyun Lee
    International Wound Journal.2022; 19(6): 1509.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Devices for Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: A scoping Review
    Soo Youn Jung, Mina Park, Kyoung Ja Moon
    Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2022; 34(2): 123.     CrossRef
  • Comparing Pressure Injury Incidence Based on Repositioning Intervals and Support Surfaces in Acute Care Settings: A Quasi-Experimental Pragmatic Study
    Jeong Sil Choi, Seon Young Hyun, Sun Ju Chang
    Advances in Skin & Wound Care.2021; 34(8): 1.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative factors and pressure ulcer development in postoperative ICU patients: a retrospective review
    Neha Kumta, Fiona Coyer, Michael David
    Journal of Wound Care.2018; 27(8): 475.     CrossRef
  • Improving the quality of nurse‐influenced patient care in the intensive care unit
    Lynsey J. Sutton, Rebecca J. Jarden
    Nursing in Critical Care.2017; 22(6): 339.     CrossRef
  • The Efficacy of a Viscoelastic Foam Overlay on Prevention of Pressure Injury in Acutely Ill Patients
    Kyung Hee Park, Joohee Park
    Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing.2017; 44(5): 440.     CrossRef
  • Automated Pressure Injury Risk Assessment System Incorporated Into an Electronic Health Record System
    Yinji Jin, Taixian Jin, Sun-Mi Lee
    Nursing Research.2017; 66(6): 462.     CrossRef
  • Prophylactic Effect of Transparent Film Dressing on Sacrum and Coccyx in SICU Patients*
    Heejeong Kim, Sun-Mi Lee, Hee young Choi, Yu Kyung Min, Yoo Jin Jung
    Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2016; 23(3): 256.     CrossRef
  • A Phenomenological Study on Illness Experience of Patients with Pressure Ulcer
    Misoo Yoo, Myungsun Yi
    Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2015; 27(5): 515.     CrossRef
  • Reusability of EMR Data for Applying Cubbin and Jackson Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale in Critical Care Patients
    Eunkyung Kim, Mona Choi, JuHee Lee, Young Ah Kim
    Healthcare Informatics Research.2013; 19(4): 261.     CrossRef
  • 117 View
  • 5 Download
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Predictive Bayesian Network Model Using Electronic Patient Records for Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers
In Sook Cho, Eunja Chung
J Korean Acad Nurs 2011;41(3):423-431.   Published online June 13, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.3.423
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The study was designed to determine the discriminating ability of a Bayesian network (BN) for predicting risk for pressure ulcers.

Methods

Analysis was done using a retrospective cohort, nursing records representing 21,114 hospital days, 3,348 patients at risk for ulcers, admitted to the intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital between January 2004 and January 2007. A BN model and two logistic regression (LR) versions, model-I and -II, were compared, varying the nature, number and quality of input variables. Classification competence and case coverage of the models were tested and compared using a threefold cross validation method.

Results

Average incidence of ulcers was 6.12%. Of the two LR models, model-I demonstrated better indexes of statistical model fits. The BN model had a sensitivity of 81.95%, specificity of 75.63%, positive and negative predictive values of 35.62% and 96.22% respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) was 85.01% implying moderate to good overall performance, which was similar to LR model-I. However, regarding case coverage, the BN model was 100% compared to 15.88% of LR.

Conclusion

Discriminating ability of the BN model was found to be acceptable and case coverage proved to be excellent for clinical use.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development of a Pressure Injury Machine Learning Prediction Model and Integration into Clinical Practice: A Prediction Model Development and Validation Study
    Ju Hee Lee, Jae Yong Yu, So Yun Shim, Kyung Mi Yeom, Hyun A Ha, Se Yong Jekal, Ki Tae Moon, Joo Hee Park, Sook Hyun Park, Jeong Hee Hong, Mi Ra Song, Won Chul Cha
    Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2024; 36(3): 191.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the risk prediction model of pressure injuries in hospitalized patient: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Yuxia Ma, Xiang He, Tingting Yang, Yifang Yang, Ziyan Yang, Tian Gao, Fanghong Yan, Boling Yan, Juan Wang, Lin Han
    Journal of Clinical Nursing.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The predictive effect of different machine learning algorithms for pressure injuries in hospitalized patients: A network meta-analyses
    Chaoran Qu, Weixiang Luo, Zhixiong Zeng, Xiaoxu Lin, Xuemei Gong, Xiujuan Wang, Yu Zhang, Yun Li
    Heliyon.2022; 8(11): e11361.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Modeling of Pressure Injury Risk in Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit
    Mireia Ladios-Martin, José Fernández-de-Maya, Francisco-Javier Ballesta-López, Adrián Belso-Garzas, Manuel Mas-Asencio, María José Cabañero-Martínez
    American Journal of Critical Care.2020; 29(4): e70.     CrossRef
  • Development and Evaluation of Electronic Health Record Data-Driven Predictive Models for Pressure Ulcers
    Seul Ki Park, Hyeoun-Ae Park, Hee Hwang
    Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2019; 49(5): 575.     CrossRef
  • Development and Comparison of Predictive Models for Pressure Injuries in Surgical Patients
    Seul Ki Park, Hyeoun-Ae Park, Hee Hwang
    Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing.2019; 46(4): 291.     CrossRef
  • Automated Pressure Injury Risk Assessment System Incorporated Into an Electronic Health Record System
    Yinji Jin, Taixian Jin, Sun-Mi Lee
    Nursing Research.2017; 66(6): 462.     CrossRef
  • Recommendation of Personalized Surveillance Interval of Colonoscopy via Survival Analysis
    Jayeon Gu, Eun Sun Kim, Seoung Bum Kim
    Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers.2016; 42(2): 129.     CrossRef
  • Medical Data Based Clinical Pathway Analysis and Automatic Ganeration System
    Hanna Park, In Ho Bae, Yong Oock Kim
    The Journal of Korea Information and Communications Society.2014; 39C(6): 497.     CrossRef
  • Reusability of EMR Data for Applying Cubbin and Jackson Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale in Critical Care Patients
    Eunkyung Kim, Mona Choi, JuHee Lee, Young Ah Kim
    Healthcare Informatics Research.2013; 19(4): 261.     CrossRef
  • Using EHR data to predict hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: A prospective study of a Bayesian Network model
    Insook Cho, Ihnsook Park, Eunman Kim, Eunjoon Lee, David W. Bates
    International Journal of Medical Informatics.2013; 82(11): 1059.     CrossRef
  • 111 View
  • 3 Download
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison for Risk Estimate of Aspiration between the Revised Dysphagia Assessment Tool and Videofluoroscopy in Post-Stroke Patients
Kyung Hee Moon, Hyun Sook Sohn, Eun Seok Lee, Eun Kyung Paek, Eun Ju Kang, Seung Hee Lee, Na Ri Han, Meen Hye Lee, Deog Young Kim, Chang Gi Park, Ji-Soo Yoo
J Korean Acad Nurs 2010;40(3):359-366.   Published online June 30, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2010.40.3.359
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the significant factors for risk estimate of aspiration and to evaluate the efficiency of the dysphagia assessment tool.

Methods

A consecutive series of 210 stroke patients with aspiration symptoms such as cough and dysphagia who had soft or regular diet without tube feeding were examined. The dysphagia assessment tool for aspiration was compared with videofluoroscopy using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis.

Results

In CART analysis, of 34 factors, the significant factors for estimating risk of aspiration were cough during swallowing, oral stasis, facial symmetry, salivary drooling, and cough after swallowing. The risk estimate error of the revised dysphagia assessment tool was 25.2%, equal to that of videofluoroscopy.

Conclusion

The results indicate that the dysphagia assessment tool developed and examined in this study was potentially useful in the clinical field and the primary risk estimating factor was cough during swallowing. Oral stasis, facial symmetry, salivary drooling, cough after swallowing were other significant factors, and based on these results, the dysphagia assessment tool for aspiration was revised and complemented.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Screening for aspiration risk associated with dysphagia in acute stroke
    Elizabeth Boaden, Jane Burnell, Lucy Hives, Paola Dey, Andrew Clegg, Mary W Lyons, C Elizabeth Lightbody, Margaret A Hurley, Hazel Roddam, Elizabeth McInnes, Anne Alexandrov, Caroline L Watkins
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and Utilization of Assessment and Intervention Checklist for Post-stroke Dysphagia
    Eun Ha Lee, Ja Yun Choi
    Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2013; 25(2): 113.     CrossRef
  • 108 View
  • 1 Download
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer

J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
Close layer
TOP