Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 33(2); 2003 > Article
Original Article
A Comparative Study on the Predictive Validity among Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales
Young Hee Lee, Ihn Sook Jeong, Seong Sook Jeon
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2003;33(2):162-169.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2003.33.2.162
Published online: March 28, 2017

1Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Pusan National University, Korea.

jeongis@pusan.ac.kr

Copyright © 2003 Korean Society of Nursing Science

  • 145 Views
  • 4 Download
  • 14 Crossref
next
  • Purpose
    This study was to compare the predictive validity of Norton Scale(1962), Cubbin & Jackson Scale(1991), and Song & Choi Scale(1991).
  • Method
    Data were collected three times per week from 48-72hours after admission based on the four pressure sore risk assessment scales and a skin assessment tool for pressure sore on 112 intensive care unit(ICU) patients in a educational hospital Ulsan during Dec, 11, 2000 to Feb, 10, 2001. Four indices of validity and area under the curve(AUC) of receiver operating characteristic(ROC) were calculated.
  • Result
    Based on the cut off point presented by the developer, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value were as follows : Norton Scale : 97%, 18%, 35%, 93% respectively; Cubbin & Jackson Scale : 89%, 61%, 51%, 92%, respectively; and Song & Choi Scale : 100%, 18%, 36%, 100% respectively. Area under the curves(AUC) of receiver operating characteristic(ROC) were Norton Scale .737, Cubbin & Jackson Scale .826, Song & Choi Scale .683.
  • Conclusion
    The Cubbin & Jackson Scale was found to be the most valid pressure sore risk assessment tool. Further studies on patients with chronic conditions may be helpful to validate this finding.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Patient-Level Fall Risk Prediction Using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership’s Common Data Model: Pilot Feasibility Study
      Hyesil Jung, Sooyoung Yoo, Seok Kim, Eunjeong Heo, Borham Kim, Ho-Young Lee, Hee Hwang
      JMIR Medical Informatics.2022; 10(3): e35104.     CrossRef
    • Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta‐Analysis
      Min Wei, Ling Wu, Yan Chen, Qiaomei Fu, Wenyue Chen, Dongliang Yang
      Nursing in Critical Care.2020; 25(3): 165.     CrossRef
    • Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales among Patients in a Trauma Intensive Care Unit
      Ja Eun Choi, Sun-Kyung Hwang
      Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing.2019; 12(2): 26.     CrossRef
    • Testing the Predictive Validity of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model
      Hyesil Jung, Hyeoun-Ae Park
      Western Journal of Nursing Research.2018; 40(12): 1785.     CrossRef
    • Automated Pressure Injury Risk Assessment System Incorporated Into an Electronic Health Record System
      Yinji Jin, Taixian Jin, Sun-Mi Lee
      Nursing Research.2017; 66(6): 462.     CrossRef
    • Longitudinal Evaluation of Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool and Nurses' Experience
      Eun Young Hur, Yinji Jin, Taixian Jin, Sun-Mi Lee
      Journal of Nursing Care Quality.2017; 32(3): 242.     CrossRef
    • Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Tools for Elderly
      Seong-Hi Park, Young-Shin Lee, Young-Mi Kwon
      Western Journal of Nursing Research.2016; 38(4): 459.     CrossRef
    • A Meta-analysis of the Timed Up and Go test for Predicting Falls
      Seong-Hi Park, On-Seok Lee
      Quality Improvement in Health Care.2016; 22(2): 27.     CrossRef
    • Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk in hospitalized patients
      Seong-Hi Park, Yun-Kyoung Choi, Chang-Bum Kang
      Journal of Tissue Viability.2015; 24(3): 102.     CrossRef
    • Validation of Fall Risk Assessment Scales among Hospitalized Patients in South Korea using Retrospective Data Analysis
      Young Ok Kang, Rhayun Song
      Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2015; 27(1): 29.     CrossRef
    • Validity of the Morse Fall Scale implemented in an electronic medical record system
      Seonhyeon Baek, Jinshi Piao, Yinji Jin, Sun‐Mi Lee
      Journal of Clinical Nursing.2014; 23(17-18): 2434.     CrossRef
    • Incidence and Associated Factors of Pressure Ulcers in Newborns
      Won-Young Choi, Hyeon-Ok Ju
      Journal of Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing.2012; 18(4): 177.     CrossRef
    • Predictive Bayesian Network Model Using Electronic Patient Records for Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers
      In Sook Cho, Eunja Chung
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2011; 41(3): 423.     CrossRef
    • Braden Scale: evaluation of clinical usefulness in an intensive care unit
      InSook Cho, Maengseok Noh
      Journal of Advanced Nursing.2010; 66(2): 293.     CrossRef

    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      A Comparative Study on the Predictive Validity among Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2003;33(2):162-169.   Published online March 28, 2017
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    We recommend
    A Comparative Study on the Predictive Validity among Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales
    A Comparative Study on the Predictive Validity among Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales

    J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
    Close layer
    TOP