So-Hi Kwon

doi:10.4040/jkan.2011.41.3.374

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 41(3); 2011 > Article

Original Article
Development and Validation of the Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale: So-Hi Kwon; Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2011;41(3):374-381.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.3.374
Published online: June 13, 2011

Full-time Lecturer, College of Nursing, Kyungpook National University·Kyungpook National University The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Daegu, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Kwon, So-Hi. College of Nursing, Kyungpook National University, 101 Dongin-dong 2-ga, Jung-gu, Deagu 700-422, Korea. Tel: +82-53-420-4924, Fax: +82-53-421-2758, sh235@knu.ac.kr

• Received: October 28, 2010 • Accepted: June 7, 2011

17 Views
0 Download
1 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a hospice·palliative care performance measure which would cover more than just physical symptoms or quality of life.
Methods
Through an intensive literature review, the author chose questions that measured aspects of physical, emotional, spiritual, social, or practical domains pertinent to hospice·palliative care for inclusion in the scale. Content validation of the questions was established by 15 hospice·palliative care professionals. A preliminary Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale (HPCPS) of 20 questions was administered to 134 pairs of terminal cancer patients from 5 hospice palliative care units and their main family caregiver. A validation study was conducted to evaluate construct validity and internal consistency.
Results
Factor analysis showed 14 significant questions in five subscales; Physical, Emotional, Spiritual, Social, and Patient' rights. There were no significant differences between the ratings by patients and family members except for three out of the 14 questions. The measure demonstrated construct validity, and Cronbach's α of the subscales ranged from .73 to .79.
Conclusion
The HPCOS demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability. It can be used to assess effectiveness of hospice·palliative care for terminal cancer patients in practice and research.
Keywords: Care; Hospice; Palliative; Outcome assessment; Validation study

This research was supported by Kyungpook National University Research Fund, 2009.

REFERENCES

1. Bosma H, Apland L, Kazanjian A. Cultural conceptualizations of hospice palliative care: More similarities than differences. Palliative Medicine. 2010;24:510–522. doi: 10.1177/0269216309351380.PubMed
2. A model to guide hospice palliative care: Based on national principles and norms of practice. Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association. 2002;Retrieved August 23, 2010. from http://www.chpca.net/.
3. Ferris FD, Bruera E, Chernry N, Cummings C, Currow D, Dudgeon H, et al. Palliative cancer care a decade later: Accomplishments, the need, next steps-from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27:3052–3058. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1558.Article PubMed
4. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. A study on the hospice payment-development of the payment system for hospice service and of the quality control system, and designing of pilot program (Issue No. K46-2008-85). 2008;Seoul, Author.
5. The hospice general inpatient level of care: Criteria, service guidelines, reimbursement and contracting. Hospice general inpatient level of care task force. 2008;Retrieved March 15, 2011. from http://edocket.access.cpo.gov/2008/pdf/08-1305.pdf.
6. Kang BS, Kim KS. SPSS 17.0: Statistical analysis of the social sciences. 2009;Seoul, Hannarae Academy.
7. Kang KA. Development of a tool to measure suffering in patients with cancer. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 1999;29:1365–1378.Article PDF
8. Kim KS. AMOS Analysis structural equation modeling. 2004;Seoul, Data Solution Inc.
9. Kim MS, Oh DG. Psychological testing. 2004;Seoul, Sigma press.
10. Kim SH, Choi YS, Lee J, Oh SC, Yeom CH, Lee MA, et al. Reliability and validity of the hospice quality of life scale for Korean cancer patients. Journal of pain and Symptom Management. 2009;37:156–167. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.02.008.Article PubMed
11. Kim SY. Development of the service model for hospice palliative care in terminal cancer care (Issue No. 0420270-1). 2005;Seoul, Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare.
12. Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. Hospice palliative care norms and regulations. 2003;Seoul, Author.
13. Lee EH, Chun MC, Wang HJ, Lim HY, Choi JH. Multidimensional constructs of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in Korean cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnosis. Cancer Research and Treatment. 2005;37:148–156. doi: 10.4143/crt.2005.37.3.148.PubMed PMC
14. Lee EH, Moon S, Cho SY, Oh YT, Chun M, Kim SH, et al. Psychometric evaluation of a need scale for cancer patients undergoing follow up care. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2010;40:551–560. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2010.40.4.551.Article PubMed
15. Lee EO, Lim NY, Park HA, Kim JI, Bai JY, Lee SM. Nursing research and statistical analysis. 2009;Seoul, Soomoonsa.
16. Lee KS, Joo J, Kim JH, Kim KY. Current status and challenge of hospice palliative care in Korea. Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care. 2008;11:196–205.
17. Mularski RA, Dy SM, Shugarman LR, Wilkinson AM, Lynn J, Shekelle PG, et al. A systematic review of measures of end-of-life care and its outcomes. Health Services Research. 2007;42:1848–1870. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00721.x.Article PubMed PMC
18. Hospice palliative care. National Cancer Information Center. 2010;04 30 Retrieved September 18, 2010. from http://www.cancer.go.kr/cms/public_project/hospice/index.html.
19. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1982;5:649–655.Article
20. Pouchot J, Le Parc J, Queffelec L, Sichère P, Flinois A. Perceptions in 7,700 patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared to their families and physicians. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74:622–626. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.11.024.Article
21. Toscani F, Brunelli C, Miccinesi G, Costantini M, Gallucci M, Tamburini M, et al. Predicting survival in terminal cancer patients: Clinical observation or quality-of-life evaluation? Palliative Medicine. 2005;19:220–227.Article PubMed PDF
22. Tu MS, Chiou CP. Perceptual consistency of pain and quality of life between hospice cancer patients and family caregivers: A pilot study. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2007;61:1686–1691. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01347.x.Article PubMed
23. Waltz CW, Bausell RB. Nursing research: Design, statistics and computer analysis. 1981;Philadelphia, PA, F.A. Davis.
24. Hospice palliative care. World Health Organization. 1998;Retrieved September 18, 2010. from http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/.
25. Yeager KA, Miaskowski C, Dibble SL, Wallhagen M. Differences in pain knowledge and perception of the pain experience between outpatients with cancer and their family caregivers. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1995;22:1235–1241.PubMed

Figure 1

Conceptual framework.

Table 1

Content Analysis Behavioral Event Interview

ECOG PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale.

Table 2

Factor Analysis of Patients' Responses to HPCPS^* Items (N=120)

^*Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale. Extraction method was principal component analysis with varimax rotation. We employed a decision rule of retaining factors whose eigen value were >1.0. Bold type indicates loadings >0.60.

Table 3

Inter-subscale Correlations and Reliability Coefficients of each Subscale of HPCPS^*

^*Spearman's correlation analysis; ^†p<.001; ^‡p<.05; ( )=Cronbach's α of each subscale.

HPCPS=Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale.

Table 4

Descriptive Statistics of each Scale/Item of the HPCPS, and their Cronbach's α values. (N=120, Patients)

HPCPS=Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale.

Table 5

Summary of Comparison and Correlation of HPCPS^* between Patients and Caregivers in Paired Group

^*Wilcoxon signed ranks test; ^†Spearman's correlation coefficients.

HPCPS=Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Development and Validation of the Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale

J Korean Acad Nurs. 2011;41(3):374-381. Published online June 13, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.3.374

XML Download

Figure

We recommend

Related articles

Development and Validation of the Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale

Figure 1 Conceptual framework.

Figure 1

Development and Validation of the Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale

Table 1

Content Analysis Behavioral Event Interview

ECOG PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale.

Table 2

Factor Analysis of Patients' Responses to HPCPS^* Items (N=120)

Table 3

Inter-subscale Correlations and Reliability Coefficients of each Subscale of HPCPS^*

^*Spearman's correlation analysis; ^†p<.001; ^‡p<.05; ( )=Cronbach's α of each subscale.

HPCPS=Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale.

Table 4

Descriptive Statistics of each Scale/Item of the HPCPS, and their Cronbach's α values. (N=120, Patients)

HPCPS=Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale.

Table 5

Summary of Comparison and Correlation of HPCPS^* between Patients and Caregivers in Paired Group

^*Wilcoxon signed ranks test; ^†Spearman's correlation coefficients.

HPCPS=Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale.

Table 1 Content Analysis Behavioral Event Interview

ECOG PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale.

Table 2 Factor Analysis of Patients' Responses to HPCPS* Items (N=120)

Table 3 Inter-subscale Correlations and Reliability Coefficients of each Subscale of HPCPS*

^*Spearman's correlation analysis; ^†p<.001; ^‡p<.05; ( )=Cronbach's α of each subscale.

HPCPS=Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale.

Table 4 Descriptive Statistics of each Scale/Item of the HPCPS, and their Cronbach's α values. (N=120, Patients)

HPCPS=Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale.

Table 5 Summary of Comparison and Correlation of HPCPS* between Patients and Caregivers in Paired Group