Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 40(6); 2010 > Article
Original Article
Contingent Nurses' Burnout and Influencing Factors
Won Ock Kim, Sook Ja Moon, Sang Sook Han
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2010;40(6):882-891.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2010.40.6.882
Published online: December 31, 2010

1Professor, College of Nursing Science, East-West Nursing Research Institute, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.

2Doctoral Students, College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Han, Sang Sook. College of Nursing Science, East-West Nursing Research Institute, Kyung Hee University, 1 Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-701, Korea. Tel: 82-2-961-9427, Fax: 82-2-961-9398, sshan12@khu.ac.kr
• Received: August 27, 2009   • Accepted: December 28, 2010

Copyright © 2010 Korean Society of Nursing Science

  • 12 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 7 Scopus
prev next
  • Purpose
    This study was designed to identify burnout and factors influencing burnout in contingent nurses.
  • Methods
    A cross-sectional design was conducted with a sample of 228 contingent nurses randomly selected from 25 general hospitals in Korea. The tools used for this study were scales measuring burnout (8 items), job stress (8 items), job satisfaction (9 items), self efficacy (9 items), organizational commitment (9 items), empowerment (9 items), autonomy (7 items) and social support (8 items). The data were analyzed using SPSS 15.0 employing Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple regression analysis.
  • Results
    The mean score for burnout in contingent nurses was 3.05 points. Factors influencing burnout in contingent nurses were identified as job stress (β=.40), satisfaction level with current ward (β=-.25), organizational commitment (β=-.21), job satisfaction (β=-.19) and empowerment (β=-.16). These factors explained 65.0% of burnout reported by contingent nurses.
  • Conclusion
    The results indicate which factors are major factors influencing burnout in contingent nurses in general hospitals. Therefore, these factors may serve as predictors of burnout in contingent nurses.
  • 1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 1977;84:191–215.ArticlePubMed
  • 2. Chi SA, Yoo HS. Concept analysis of professional nurse autonomy. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2001;31:781–792.ArticlePDF
  • 3. Choi KJ. The factors that affect burnout of nurses. 2007;Seoul, Kyunghee University. Unpublished master's thesis.
  • 4. Choi WH. A labor minister in non-regular employees use period four years. 2009;01 04 The Hankyoreh. 1.
  • 5. Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Vardakou I, Kantas A. The convergent validity of two burnout instruments: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2003;19:12–23.Article
  • 6. Han SS, Moon SJ, Yun EK. Empowerment, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: Comparison of permanent and temporary nurses in Korea. Appl Nurs Res. 2009;22:e15–e20.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Han SS, Park SW. Prediction factors on the organizational commitment in registered nurses. Journal of East-West Nursing Research. 2006;12:5–13.
  • 8. Jung SK. Hospital temporary worker issues: Low income, ease of lay off. The daily medi. 2008;12 03 Retrieved June 6, 2010. from http://www.dailymedi.com/news/opdb/index.php.
  • 9. Kanter RM. Men and women of the corporation. 1977;New York, Basic Books.
  • 10. Kim HK, Ji HS, Ryu EK, Lee HJ, Yun SE, Jeon MK. Factors influencing on burnout of the nurses in hospitals. Clinical Nursing Research. 2004;10(2):7–18.
  • 11. Kim IW. A structural equation model on head nurse's leadership. 2005;Seoul, Kyunghee University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
  • 12. Kim JW. The Effect of job characteristics and employment relationships characteristics on organizational commitment of contingent workers: Focused on moderating effect of job satisfaction. Journal of Human Resource Management Research. 2007;14:23–35.
  • 13. Kim MS, Park YB. The effects of self-efficacy and empowerment on perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behaviors of urses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2008;14:268–277.
  • 14. Kim MY. A study on the relationship between job strain and burnout. 2004;Cheongju, Chungbuk National University. Unpublished master's thesis.
  • 15. Kim TH, Kim JW, Kwon JS. The differences in predictors of job involvement between permanent and non-regular workers. Daehan Journal of Business. 2004;43:507–527.
  • 16. Kim YO. A study of factors predicting burnout in hospital staff nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing. 2002;14:591–601.
  • 17. Ko JW, Yom YH. The role of social support in the relationship between job stress and job satisfaction/organizational commitment among hospital nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2003;33:265–274.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 18. Koh SB, Son M, Kong JO, Lee CG, Chang SJ, Cha BS. Job characteristics and psychosocial distress of atypical workers. Korean Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2004;16:103–113.ArticlePDF
  • 19. Mowday RT, Steers RM, Porter LW. The management of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1979;14:224–247.Article
  • 20. Park CS. Factors influencing on burnout experience in working nurses at hospital. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2002;8:550–558.ArticlePDF
  • 21. Park DJ. Effectiveness of 'part time nurses' from Ministry of Health and Welfare. The daily medi. 2009;07 28 Retrieved July 3, 2010. from http://www.dailymedi.com/news/opdb/index.php.
  • 22. Parker DF, DeCotiis TA. Organizational determinants of job stress. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1983;32:160–177.Article
  • 23. Peeters MC, Buunk BP, Schaufeli WB. Social interactions, stressful events and negative affect at work: A micro-analytic approach. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1995;25:391–401.Article
  • 24. Sherer M, Maddux JE, Mercandante B, Prentice-Dunn S, Jacobs B, Rogers RW. The self-efficacy scale: Constructionvalidation. Psychological Reports. 1982;51:663–671.
  • 25. Slavitt DB, Stamps PL, Piedmont EB, Haase AM. Nurses' satisfaction with their work situation. Nursing Research. 1978;27:114–120.PubMed
  • 26. Spreitzer GM. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal. 1995;38:1442–1465.Article
  • 27. Taskforce Team for Temporary Employees at the Office of Work Standard. Explanation of the law protecting the rights of temporary worker: Ministry of labor. 2006;09;Seoul, Author.
  • 28. Wu Sl, Zhu W, Wang Z, Wang M, Lan Y. Relationship between burnout and occupational stress among nurse in China. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007;59:233–239.ArticlePubMed
Table 1
Burnout by Demographics and General Characteristics of Participants (N=212)
jkan-40-882-i001.jpg

*Sheffe test: Different letters mean significantly different.

Table 2
Mean and Standard Deviation of Variables
jkan-40-882-i002.jpg
Table 3
Correlation among Variables
jkan-40-882-i003.jpg

*p<.05; p<.01.

X1=Burnout; X2=Job stress; X3=Job satisfaction; X4=Self-efficacy; X5=Organizational commitment; X6=Empowerment; X7=Autonomy; X8=Social support; X9=Satisfaction level with current ward; X10=Total length of clinic career; X11=Employment period at the current work; X12=Employment period on the current ward; X13=Age.

Table 4
Factors Influencing Burnout in Contingent Nurses
jkan-40-882-i004.jpg

Adj R2=Adjusted R2

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Contingent Nurses' Burnout and Influencing Factors
        J Korean Acad Nurs. 2010;40(6):882-891.   Published online December 31, 2010
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      We recommend
      Contingent Nurses' Burnout and Influencing Factors
      Contingent Nurses' Burnout and Influencing Factors

      Burnout by Demographics and General Characteristics of Participants (N=212)

      *Sheffe test: Different letters mean significantly different.

      Mean and Standard Deviation of Variables

      Correlation among Variables

      *p<.05; p<.01.

      X1=Burnout; X2=Job stress; X3=Job satisfaction; X4=Self-efficacy; X5=Organizational commitment; X6=Empowerment; X7=Autonomy; X8=Social support; X9=Satisfaction level with current ward; X10=Total length of clinic career; X11=Employment period at the current work; X12=Employment period on the current ward; X13=Age.

      Factors Influencing Burnout in Contingent Nurses

      Adj R2=Adjusted R2

      Table 1 Burnout by Demographics and General Characteristics of Participants (N=212)

      *Sheffe test: Different letters mean significantly different.

      Table 2 Mean and Standard Deviation of Variables

      Table 3 Correlation among Variables

      *p<.05; p<.01.

      X1=Burnout; X2=Job stress; X3=Job satisfaction; X4=Self-efficacy; X5=Organizational commitment; X6=Empowerment; X7=Autonomy; X8=Social support; X9=Satisfaction level with current ward; X10=Total length of clinic career; X11=Employment period at the current work; X12=Employment period on the current ward; X13=Age.

      Table 4 Factors Influencing Burnout in Contingent Nurses

      Adj R2=Adjusted R2


      J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
      Close layer
      TOP