Nami Chun

doi:10.4040/jkan.2010.40.1.24

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 40(1); 2010 > Article

Original Article
Predictors of Sexual Desire, Arousal, Lubrication, Orgasm, Satisfaction, and Pain in Women with Gynecologic Cancer: Nami Chun; Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2010;40(1):24-32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2010.40.1.24
Published online: February 28, 2010

Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, Sungshin Women's University, Seoul, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Chun, Nami. College of Nursing, Sungshin Women's University, Dongseondong 3-ga, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-742, Korea. Tel: 82-2-920-7523, Fax: 82-2-920-2091, nmchun@sungshin.ac.kr

• Received: November 5, 2009 • Accepted: January 13, 2010

176 Views
0 Download
10 Crossref
4 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
This study was done to identify psychosocial factors that might be predictive of sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain in women with gynecologic cancer.
Methods
Two hundred and twelve women with cervical, ovarian, or endometrial cancer completed questionnaires on the Female Sexual Function Index including sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain, and data on their psychosocial factors including body image, sexual attitude, sexual information, depression, and marital intimacy. Stepwise multivariable regression analysis was performed to explore psychosocial predictors of women's sexual function domains.
Results
Predictors were identified as sexual attitude, depression, sexual information, and body image for sexual desire; sexual information, depression, and sexual attitude for sexual arousal; sexual information, marital intimacy, and depression for lubrication; sexual information, marital intimacy, depression, and body image for orgasm; marital intimacy, sexual information, sexual attitude, and depression for satisfaction; sexual information, depression, and marital intimacy for pain.
Conclusion
The results indicate that women's sexual function needs to be approached to domains of female sexual function psychosocially as well as to general sexual function. These factors should be considered in future interventions to positively promote sexual function in women with gynecologic cancer.
Keywords: Female sexual dysfunction; Arousal; Orgasm

This work was supported by Sungshin Women's University research grant.

REFERENCES

1. Bancroft J, Loftus J, Long JS. Distress about sex; A national survey of women in heterosexual relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2003;32:193–208.PubMed
2. Basson R, Berman J, Burnett A, Derogatis L, Ferguson D, Fourcroy J, et al. Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: Definition and classifications. Journal of Urology. 2000;163:888–893.Article PubMed
3. Carmack Taylor CL, Basen-Engquist K, Shinn EH, Bodurka DC. Predictors of sexual functioning in ovarian cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004;22:881–889.Article PubMed
4. Chang SB. An analytic study on influencing factors for sexual satisfaction in women who have had a hysterectomy. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 1989;19:160–172.Article PDF
5. Chon KK, Rhee MK. Preliminary development of Korean version of CES-D. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1992;11:65–76.
6. Chun N. Structural equation modeling on sexual function in women with gynecologic cancer. 2007;Seoul, Seoul National University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
7. Chun N. A structural equation model on sexual function in women with gynecologic cancer. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2008;38:639–648.Article PubMed
8. Chun N, Park YS. Sexual function in women with gynecologic cancer. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2006;12:308–315.
9. Derogatis LR, Meyer JK, Vazquez F. A psychological profile of the transsexual. I. The male. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 1978;166:234–254.Article PubMed
10. Doo JK. Sexual dysfunction in women. Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Continuing Education. 2000;30:80–90.
11. Jensen PT, Groenvold M, Klee MC, Thranov I, Petersen MA, Machin D. Early-stage cervical carcinoma, radical hysterectomy, and sexual function. A longitudinal study. Cancer. 2003;100:97–106.Article
12. Kadri N, McHichi Alami KH, McHakra Tahiri S. Sexual dysfunction in women: Population based epidemiological study. Archives of Women's Mental Health. 2002;5:59–63.Article PDF
13. Kim JK, Koh HJ, Lim KH. A study on sexual knowledge, attitude and activity according to sexual satisfaction of wife and husband after hysterectomy. Journal of the Korean Society of Maternal and Child Health. 2002;6:71–82.
14. Kim SN. A structural model for quality of life in women having hysterectomies. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 1999;29:161–173.Article PDF
15. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. Journal of American Medical Association. 1999;281:537–544.
16. Malacara JM, Canto de Cetina T, Bassol S, Gonzalez N, Cacique L, Vera-Ramirez ML. Symptoms at pre- and postmenopause in rural and urban women from three states of Mexico. Maturitas. 2002;43:11–19.Article PubMed
17. Nappi RE, Verde JB, Polatti F, Genazzani AR, Zara C. Self-reported sexual symptoms in women attending menopauseclinics. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2002;53:181–187.PubMed
18. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research -principles and methods. 2004;7th ed. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
19. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–401.
20. Rodes JC, Kjerulff KH, Lengenberg PW, Guzinski GM. Hysterectomy and sexual functioning. Journal of American Medical Association. 1999;282:1934–1941.Article
21. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2000;26:191–208.
22. Shokrollahi P, Mirmohamadi M, Mehrabi F, Babaei G. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women seeking services at family planning center in Tehran. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 1999;25:211–215.
23. Simon W, Gagnon JH. Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 1986;15:97–120.Article PubMed PDF
24. Speer JJ, Hillenberg B, Sugrue DP, Blacker C, Kresge CL, Decker VB, et al. Study of sexual functioning determinants in breast cancer survivors. Breast Journal. 2005;11:440–447.PubMed
25. Stewart DE, Wong F, Duff S, Melancon CH, Cheung AM. "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger": Anovarian cancer survivor survey. Gynecologic Oncology. 2001;83:537–542.PubMed
26. Waring EM, Reddon JR. The measurement of intimacy in marriage: The Waring intimacy questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1983;39:53–57.Article PubMed
27. West LW, Vinikoor LC, Zolnoun DA. Systemic review of the literature on female sexual dysfunction prevalence and predictors. Annual Review of Sex Research. 2004;15:40–172.PubMed
28. Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): Cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. 2005;31:1–20.PubMed
29. World Health Organization. Defining sexual health, Report of technical consultation on sexual health. 28-31. January 2002, Geneva. 2006.
30. Yu HS. Predictors of female sexual dysfunction. 2003;Seoul, Seoul National University. Unpublished master's thesis.

Table 1

Subscales of FSFI and their Reliabilities (Cronbach's α)

FSFI=female sexual function Index.

Table 2

Characteristics of Participants (N=212)

Table 3

Means of Scores for Domains & Psychosocial Variables

Table 4

Psychosocial Predictors of FSFI Domains: Stepwise Multiple Regression

^*p<.001.

Adj. R²=adjusted R²; FSFI=female sexual function index.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Assessment of factors influencing sexual dysfunction and the coping strategies adopted by cancer patients in selected hospitals of the city
Samina Mehaboob Mulani
i-manager’s Journal on Nursing.2022; 12(3): 28. CrossRef
Psychosexual Advantages of Physical Adaptation
Sujita Kumar Kar, Garima Singh
Journal of Psychosexual Health.2022; 4(3): 203. CrossRef
Influence of Urinary Dysfunction on Quality of Life in Women with Cervical Cancer after Radical Hysterectomy
Nami Chun, Gie-Ok Noh
Asian Oncology Nursing.2019; 19(3): 150. CrossRef
Sexual function, depression, and quality of life in patients with cervical cancer
Hyewoo Bae, Hyojung Park
Supportive Care in Cancer.2016; 24(3): 1277. CrossRef
Comparison of Distress and Body Image according to the Stages of Cancer Survivorship in Gynecological Cancer Patients
Jeong Sook Park, Hye Ran Lee
Asian Oncology Nursing.2014; 14(1): 15. CrossRef
Factors Related to Female Sexual Dysfunction of North Korean Women Defectors
Young Sun Rhee, Hye Wan Ku, In Young Han
Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion.2013; 30(2): 55. CrossRef
Menopausal symptoms, sexual function, depression, and quality of life in Korean patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy
Hyojung Park, Hyeon Gyeong Yoon
Supportive Care in Cancer.2013; 21(9): 2499. CrossRef
Factors Influencing on Quality of Life in Gynecological Cancer Patients
Jeong-Sook Park, Yun-Jung Oh
Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2012; 24(1): 52. CrossRef
A Study on the Predictive Factors of Sexual Function in Women with Gynecologic Cancer
Jeong Sook Park, Soon Yang Jang
Asian Oncology Nursing.2012; 12(2): 156. CrossRef
Effectiveness of PLISSIT Model Sexual Program on Female Sexual Function for Women with Gynecologic Cancer
Nami Chun
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2011; 41(4): 471. CrossRef

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Predictors of Sexual Desire, Arousal, Lubrication, Orgasm, Satisfaction, and Pain in Women with Gynecologic Cancer

J Korean Acad Nurs. 2010;40(1):24-32. Published online February 28, 2010

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2010.40.1.24

XML Download

We recommend

Predictors of Sexual Desire, Arousal, Lubrication, Orgasm, Satisfaction, and Pain in Women with Gynecologic Cancer

Table 1

Subscales of FSFI and their Reliabilities (Cronbach's α)

FSFI=female sexual function Index.

Table 2

Characteristics of Participants (N=212)

Table 3

Means of Scores for Domains & Psychosocial Variables

Table 4

Psychosocial Predictors of FSFI Domains: Stepwise Multiple Regression

^*p<.001.

Adj. R²=adjusted R²; FSFI=female sexual function index.

Table 1 Subscales of FSFI and their Reliabilities (Cronbach's α)

FSFI=female sexual function Index.

Table 2 Characteristics of Participants (N=212)

Table 3 Means of Scores for Domains & Psychosocial Variables

Table 4 Psychosocial Predictors of FSFI Domains: Stepwise Multiple Regression