Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 38(1); 2008 > Article
research-article
Effects of the Nutrition Education Program on Self-efficacy, Diet Behavior Pattern and Cardiovascular Risk Factors for the Patients with Cardiovascular Disease
Kyoungok Ju, Heeyoung So
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2008;38(1):64-73.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2008.38.1.64
Published online: February 28, 2008

1Instructor, Department of Nursing, Chungnam National University

2Professor, Department of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea

Address reprint requests to : Ju, Kyoungok Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, 640 Daesa-dong, Jung-gu, Daejeon 301-721, Korea Tel: 82-42-580-8321 Fax: 82-42-584-8915 E-mail: jko2080@hanmail.net
• Received: June 1, 2007   • Accepted: September 18, 2007

Copyright © 2008 Korean Society of Nursing Science

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 199 Views
  • 2 Download
  • 16 Crossref
  • 10 Scopus
prev next
  • Purpose
    This study examined the effects of a nutrition education program on self-efficacy, diet behavior pattern and cardiovascular risk factors for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD).
  • Method
    Sixty-four CVD subjects (37 experimental, 27 control) were recruited from a cardiac center, at a university hospital located in D city, Korea. All subjects attended a first heart camp where pretest measures were performed, and a second heart camp at 6 months for the posttest measures. During the 6 month study period, the experimental group was required to attend five monthly nutrition education sessions, while the control group received only routine outpatient follow-ups. Data were analyzed by X2-test and independent t-test using the SPSSWIN 11.5 program.
  • Result
    Group comparisons revealed that the experimental group had significantly more improved self-efficacy, frequency of food selection, gustation of salt, systolic blood pressure, and serum total-cholesterol compared to the control group.
  • Conclusion
    A nutrition education program may be effective in improving self-efficacy, diet behavior pattern and cardiovascular risk factors for patients with cardiovascular disease.
Table 1.
Homogeneity Test for General and Disease-Related Characteristics between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=64)
Characteristics Frequency (%)
χ2 p
Total Experimental (n=37) Control (n=27)
Gender 3.025 .082
 Male 41 (64.1) 27 (73.0) 14 (51.9)
 Female 23 (35.9) 10 (27.0) 13 (48.1)
Age (yr) 1.420 .701
 < 60 5 (7.8) 4 (10.8) 1 (3.7)
 60-64 18 (28.1) 10 (27.1) 8 (29.6)
 65-69 27 (42.2) 16 (43.2) 11 (40.8)
 ≥70 14 (21.9) 7 (18.9) 7 (25.9)
 Mean (SD) 66.36 (4.01) 65.92 (3.69) 66.96 (4.42)
Marital status 2.829 .093
 Married 62 (96.9) 37 (100.0) 25 (92.6)
 Widowed 2 (3.1) 0 (0) 2 (7.4)
Education 4.093 .536
 Elementary school 17 (26.6) 8 (21.6) 9 (33.3)
 Middle school 7 (10.9) 4 (10.8) 3 (11.2)
 High school 18 (28.1) 10 (27.1) 8 (29.6)
 College or more 22 (34.4) 15 (40.5) 7 (25.9)
Economic status 1.730 .188
 Middle 48 (75.0) 30 (81.1) 18 (66.7)
 Low 16 (25.0) 7 (18.9) 9 (33.3)
Smoking 3.768 .583
 Current smoker 3 (4.6) 1 (2.7) 2 (7.4)
Quit
 ≥5 yr 15 (23.5) 10 (27.0) 5 (18.5)
 <5 yr 14 (21.9) 10 (27.0) 4 (14.8)
 None 32 (50.0) 16 (43.3) 16 (59.3)
Admission history 0.152 .697
 Yes 29 (45.3) 16 (43.2) 13 (48.1)
 No 35 (54.7) 21 (56.8) 14 (51.9)
Chronic disease*
 Arthritis 16 (25.0) 10 (27.0) 6 (20.0)
 Diabetes 10 (15.6) 6 (16.2) 4 (13.3)
 Hypertension 30 (46.9) 18 (48.6) 14 (46.7)
 Vascular disease 24 (37.5) 16 (43.2) 8 (29.6)
 Respiratory disease 10 (15.6) 5 (13.5) 5 (16.7)
 Neuralgia 10 (15.6) 6 (16.2) 4 (13.3)
 Others 5 (7.8) 3 (8.1) 2 (6.7)
Perceived health status 2.176 .537
 A lot worse 12 (18.8) 9 (24.3) 3 (11.1)
 Somewhat worse 14 (21.9) 8 (21.6) 6 (22.2)
 Similar 28 (43.8) 14 (37.8) 14 (51.9)
 Somewhat better 10 (15.5) 6 (16.3) 4 (14.8)

*Multiple response.

Table 2.
Homogeneity Test for Self Efficacy, Diet Behavior Pattern and Cardiovascular Risk Factors between the Experimental and Control Groups
Variables Experimental (n=37)
Control (n=27)
t p
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Self- efficacy 45.62 (9.28) 43.89 (10.02) -0.713 .739
Diet behavior pattern
Diet behavior 15.43 (2.63) 15.19 (3.05) -0.347 .406
Frequency of food selection 99.92 (5.29) 101.93 (6.25) 1.388 .314
Gustation of salt (%) 0.32 (0.14) 0.29 (0.12) -0.716 .190
Cardiovascular risk factors
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 127.86 (17.55) 126.26 (16.21) -0.373 .707
Body mass index (kg/m2) 23.96 (2.66) 26.08 (2.56) 3.197 .772
Body fat rate (%) 24.78 (6.24) 29.63 (5.76) 3.177 .530
Waist circumference (cm) 84.40 (7.37) 89.36 (7.09) 2.698 .954
Total-cholesterol (mg/dl) 194.59 (37.91) 178.97 (35.24) -1.677 .202
Triglyceride (mg/dl) 113.01 (42.61) 125.85 (43.50) 1.181 .901
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 49.76 (14.10) 44.44 (11.35) -1.613 .080
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 119.54 (32.11) 111.57 (29.28) -1.018 .327
Glucose (mg/dl) 100.05 (15.72) 96.37 (13.63) -0.978 .392
Table 3.
Mean Group Comparisons in Self Efficacy, Diet Behavior Pattern and Cardiovascular Risk Factors at the Posttest
Variables Posttest scores
Mean difference
t p
Experimental (n=37)
Control (n=27)
Experimental (n=37)
Control (n=27)
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Self- efficacy 46.97 (9.55) 40.22 (9.80) 1.35 (8.37) -3.67 (8.42) -2.363 .021
Diet behavior pattern
Diet behavior 16.32 (2.14) 15.56 (2.03) 0.89 (2.08) 0.37 (2.22) -0.963 .339
Frequency of food selection 101.92 (4.95) 99.56 (4.74) 2.00 (5.75) -2.37 (5.99) -2.950 .004
Gustation of salt (%) 0.19 (0.13) 0.28 (0.14) -0.13 (0.16) -0.01 (0.15) 2.996 .004
Cardiovascular risk factors
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 125.46 (15.76) 135.19 (15.91) -2.41 (15.05) 8.93 (11.92) 3.238 .002
Body mass index (kg/m2) 24.15 (2.58) 26.39 (2.58) 0.19 (0.66) 0.31 (0.73) 0.700 .486
Body fat rate (%) 26.18 (5.83) 30.67 (5.71) 1.41 (1.68) 1.04 (1.78) -0.851 .398
Waist circumference (cm) 84.59 (7.05) 89.70 (7.67) 0.19 (3.06) 0.35 (3.92) 0.179 .858
Total-cholesterol (mg/dl) 173.14 (30.75) 173.82 (30.64) -21.46 (41.34) -4.81 (22.12) 2.075 .042
Triglyceride (mg/dl) 116.78 (57.72) 131.06 (41.04) -9.14 (71.89) 11.78 (60.38) 1.228 .224
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 45.00 (13.07) 42.22 (9.03) -4.76 (5.59) -2.22 (5.12) 1.856 .068
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 106.32 (29.73) 109.74 (39.92) -13.22 (31.56) -5.56 (18.48) 1.127 .264
Glucose (mg/dl) 81.11 (17.27) 83.15 (11.25) -18.95 (22.04) -13.22 (14.83) 1.169 .247
  • 1. Bandura A. In: Self-Efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997.
  • 2. Chait A, Malinow MR, Nevin DN, Morris CD, Eastgard RL, Kris-Etherton P, et al. Increased dietary macronutrients decreased serum homocysteine concentration in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:881–887.PubMed
  • 3. Chang UJ, Lim KA, Han YB. Effect of nutrition education on weight control program. Korean J Food Nutr. 1999;12:177–183.
  • 4. Choi JC. In: An Analysis of Effects of Intervention Methods for Community-based Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases. Kimhae: Inje University; 2005.
  • 5. Cohen J. In: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
  • 6. Choi BG, Shon RS, Yoon TY, Choi JM, Park SY, Yoo DJ. Association of anthropometric indices with prevalence of hypertension in Korean adults. J Korean Prev Med. 1999;32:443–451.
  • 7. Edmundson E, Parcel GS, Feldman HA, Elder J, Perry CL, Johnson CC, et al. The effects of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health upon psychosocial determinants of diet and physical activity behavior. Prev Med. 1996;25:442–454.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Elliott P, Stamler J, Nichols R, Dyer AR, Stamler R, Kesteloot H, et al. Intersalt revised: further analyses of 24 hours sodium excretion and blood pressure within and across populations. Intersalt Cooperative Research Group. BMJ. 1996;312:1249–1253.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 9. Expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (2001). Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adults Treatment Panel Ⅲ). JAMA. 2001;285:2486–2497.PubMed
  • 10. Grundy SM, Pasternak R, Greenland P, Smith S Jr, Fuster V. Assessment of cardiovascular risk by use of multiplerisk-factor assessment equations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1348–1359.PubMed
  • 11. Gu MO, Yu JS, Kweon IK, Kim HW, Lee EO. A review of research on self-efficacy theory applied to health related behavior. J Korean Acad Nurs. 1994;24:278–302.ArticlePDF
  • 12. Han SH. In: The effect of exercise program with strategies promoting self-efficacy on health status and exercise capacity in patients after the stem cell transplantation. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2000.
  • 13. Janz N, Campion V, Strecher V. The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Lewis F, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 3rd ed. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002. pp. 45-66.
  • 14. Jensen K, Banwart L, Venhaus R, Popkess-Vawter S, Perkins SB. Advanced rehabilitation nursing care of coronary angioplasty patients using self-efficacy theory. J Adv Nurs. 1993;18:926–931.ArticlePubMed
  • 15. Kim MY, Lee SW, Shin ES, Park HS. Diet and eating behavior in obese patients. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 1994;15:353–362.
  • 16. Kim MS, Kim SY. The three dimensions of eating behavior: development of scale for assessing cognitive restraint of eating, disinhibition, and hunger. J Korean Acad Nurs. 1997;27:377–388.ArticlePDF
  • 17. Kim S, Sohn C, Chung WY. Effects of medical nutrition therapy on food habits and serum lipid levels of hypercholesterolemic patients. J Korean Dietetic Assoc. 2005;11(1):125–132.
  • 18. Statistics of Causes of Death of Korean. Korea National Statistical Office; 2003.
  • 19. Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, Appel LJ, Daniels SR, Deckelbaum RJ, et al. AHA dietary guidelines: revision 2000: a statement for health care professionals from the nutrition committee of the American heart association. Circulation. 2000;102:2284–2299.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. Lee HJ. In: Effect of Individual Health Education in the Medical Clinic of Public Health Centers on Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, and Self-care behavior in Clients with Hypertension. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2004.
  • 21. Metz JA, Stern JS, Kris-Etherton P, Reusser ME, Morris CD, Hatton DC, et al. A randomized trial of improved weight loss with a prepared meal plan in overweight and obese patients: impact on cardiovascular risk reduction. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2150–2158.ArticlePubMed
  • 22. Miller CK, Edwards L, Kissling G, Sanville L. Evaluation of a theory-based nutrition intervention for older adults with diabetes mellitus. J Am Dietetic Assoc. 2002;102:1069–1081.Article
  • 23. Moon EH. In: Implementation and evaluation of nutrition education program for hypertensive patients among adults aged 50 and over. Seoul: Seoul Women's University; 2004.
  • 24. Oh DJ. In: Characteristics of cardiovascular disease. The Korean Society of Circulation; 2003.
  • 25. Reusser ME, McCarron DA. Reducing hypertensive cardiovascular risk of african americans with diet: focus on the facts. J Nutr. 2006;136:1099–1102.PubMed
  • 26. Shin MJ, Lim HS, Chung NS, Cho SY, Kim SS. Effect of dietary therapy on blood lipid in outpatients with hypercholesterolemia. J Korean Diet Assoc. 2001;7:313–319.
  • 27. Song R, June KJ, Ro YJ, Kim CG. Effects of motivation-enhancing program on health behaviors, cardiovascular risk factors, and functional status for Institutionalized elderly women. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2001;31:858–870.ArticlePDF
  • 28. Stunkard A, Messick S. The three factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restrain, disinhibition, and hunger. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(1):71–83.PubMed
  • 29. Yoon JS, Jeong YH, Park JA, Oh HM. The effect of individualized nutritional education on adults having two or more symptoms of chronic degenerative disease. Korean J Community Nutr. 2002;7:794–802.
  • 30. Yu SJ, Song MS, Lee YJ. The effects of self-efficacy promotion and education program on self-efficacy, self-care behavior, and blood pressure for elderly hypertensives. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 2001;13(1):108–122.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Effectiveness of a Participatory Program for Improving the Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Health of Older Farmers in Rural Korea
      Ki-Youn Kim, Juhye Jin, Yeon-Ha Kim
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2023; 20(4): 3210.     CrossRef
    • Educational interventions on nutrition among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
      Felix Jesus Neves, Luciana Yuki Tomita, Angela Sun Li Wu Liu, Solange Andreoni, Luiz Roberto Ramos
      Maturitas.2020; 136: 13.     CrossRef
    • Effects of Korean diet control nutrition education on cardiovascular disease risk factors in patients who underwent cardiovascular disease surgery
      Su-Jin Jung, Soo-Wan Chae
      Journal of Nutrition and Health.2018; 51(3): 215.     CrossRef
    • A Pilot Study of APN-led Self-management Program to Improve Cardiovascular Health Status among Korean Women with Risk Factors
      Nah-Mee Shin, Ji-Won Yoon, Jiwon Choi, Younghee Park, Songi Jeon
      Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2016; 28(2): 237.     CrossRef
    • Development and Application of Low-Carbohydrates and Low-Simple Sugar Nutrition Education Materials for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients
      Yoo-Min An, Dae Won Jun, Seung Min Lee
      Clinical Nutrition Research.2015; 4(4): 250.     CrossRef
    • The effects of the DASH diet education program with omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on metabolic syndrome parameters in elderly women with abdominal obesity
      Seung-Hye Choi, Smi Choi-Kwon
      Nutrition Research and Practice.2015; 9(2): 150.     CrossRef
    • Risk Factor–tailored Small Group Education for Patients with First-time Acute Coronary Syndrome
      Seon Young Hwang, Jin Shil Kim
      Asian Nursing Research.2015; 9(4): 291.     CrossRef
    • Dietary Life related to Sodium of Participants in Hypertension and Diabetes Preventive Education at the Public Health Center
      Hee-Ok Pak, Chun-Young Sohn, Jung-Hwa Park
      The Korean Journal of Food And Nutrition.2015; 28(2): 219.     CrossRef
    • Effects of Individual and Group Education Programs on Coping and Self-care Behaviors in Cancer Patients
      Young Mi Kim, Won Ock Kim, Sang Sook Han
      Journal of East-West Nursing Research.2014; 20(1): 1.     CrossRef
    • Short-term Effects of a Lifestyle Intervention Program on Eating Behaviors, Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Risks in Korean Adults
      Jiyeon Park, Hyekyeong Kim
      Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion.2014; 31(4): 37.     CrossRef
    • Effects of a Comprehensive Lifestyle Improvement Program for Middle-aged Women with Cardio-cerebrovascular Disease-related Risk Factors
      Mi-Kyoung Park, Jeong-Hee Kim
      Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing.2013; 24(2): 111.     CrossRef
    • The Effects of a Comprehensive Education Program on Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, and Coping Style among Newly Diagnosed Patients with Breast Cancer
      Keon Suk Lee, Ran Lee, Dong Mi Kim, Soo Hyun Kim
      Asian Oncology Nursing.2012; 12(1): 35.     CrossRef
    • The Effect of Sodium Reduction Education Program of a Public Health Center on the Blood Pressure, Blood Biochemical Profile and Sodium Intake of Hypertensive Adults
      Eun Jin Jung, Sook Mee Son, Jong-Sook Kwon
      Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2012; 17(6): 752.     CrossRef
    • Evaluation of a cardiovascular health promotion programme offered to low‐income women in Korea
      Kyung Ok Ham, Bong Jeong Kim
      Journal of Clinical Nursing.2011; 20(9-10): 1245.     CrossRef
    • Comparison of Cardiovascular Health Status and Health Behaviors in Korean Women based on Household Income
      Young-Joo Park, Nah-Mee Shin, Ji-Won Yoon, Jiwon Choi, Sook-Ja Lee
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2010; 40(6): 831.     CrossRef
    • Development of the Pregnancy Nutrition Knowledge Scale and Its Relationship with Eating Habits in Pregnant Women visiting Community Health Center
      Hae Won Kim
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2009; 39(1): 33.     CrossRef

    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Effects of the Nutrition Education Program on Self-efficacy, Diet Behavior Pattern and Cardiovascular Risk Factors for the Patients with Cardiovascular Disease
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2008;38(1):64-73.   Published online February 28, 2008
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    We recommend
    Effects of the Nutrition Education Program on Self-efficacy, Diet Behavior Pattern and Cardiovascular Risk Factors for the Patients with Cardiovascular Disease
    Effects of the Nutrition Education Program on Self-efficacy, Diet Behavior Pattern and Cardiovascular Risk Factors for the Patients with Cardiovascular Disease
    Characteristics Frequency (%)
    χ2 p
    Total Experimental (n=37) Control (n=27)
    Gender 3.025 .082
     Male 41 (64.1) 27 (73.0) 14 (51.9)
     Female 23 (35.9) 10 (27.0) 13 (48.1)
    Age (yr) 1.420 .701
     < 60 5 (7.8) 4 (10.8) 1 (3.7)
     60-64 18 (28.1) 10 (27.1) 8 (29.6)
     65-69 27 (42.2) 16 (43.2) 11 (40.8)
     ≥70 14 (21.9) 7 (18.9) 7 (25.9)
     Mean (SD) 66.36 (4.01) 65.92 (3.69) 66.96 (4.42)
    Marital status 2.829 .093
     Married 62 (96.9) 37 (100.0) 25 (92.6)
     Widowed 2 (3.1) 0 (0) 2 (7.4)
    Education 4.093 .536
     Elementary school 17 (26.6) 8 (21.6) 9 (33.3)
     Middle school 7 (10.9) 4 (10.8) 3 (11.2)
     High school 18 (28.1) 10 (27.1) 8 (29.6)
     College or more 22 (34.4) 15 (40.5) 7 (25.9)
    Economic status 1.730 .188
     Middle 48 (75.0) 30 (81.1) 18 (66.7)
     Low 16 (25.0) 7 (18.9) 9 (33.3)
    Smoking 3.768 .583
     Current smoker 3 (4.6) 1 (2.7) 2 (7.4)
    Quit
     ≥5 yr 15 (23.5) 10 (27.0) 5 (18.5)
     <5 yr 14 (21.9) 10 (27.0) 4 (14.8)
     None 32 (50.0) 16 (43.3) 16 (59.3)
    Admission history 0.152 .697
     Yes 29 (45.3) 16 (43.2) 13 (48.1)
     No 35 (54.7) 21 (56.8) 14 (51.9)
    Chronic disease*
     Arthritis 16 (25.0) 10 (27.0) 6 (20.0)
     Diabetes 10 (15.6) 6 (16.2) 4 (13.3)
     Hypertension 30 (46.9) 18 (48.6) 14 (46.7)
     Vascular disease 24 (37.5) 16 (43.2) 8 (29.6)
     Respiratory disease 10 (15.6) 5 (13.5) 5 (16.7)
     Neuralgia 10 (15.6) 6 (16.2) 4 (13.3)
     Others 5 (7.8) 3 (8.1) 2 (6.7)
    Perceived health status 2.176 .537
     A lot worse 12 (18.8) 9 (24.3) 3 (11.1)
     Somewhat worse 14 (21.9) 8 (21.6) 6 (22.2)
     Similar 28 (43.8) 14 (37.8) 14 (51.9)
     Somewhat better 10 (15.5) 6 (16.3) 4 (14.8)
    Variables Experimental (n=37)
    Control (n=27)
    t p
    Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
    Self- efficacy 45.62 (9.28) 43.89 (10.02) -0.713 .739
    Diet behavior pattern
    Diet behavior 15.43 (2.63) 15.19 (3.05) -0.347 .406
    Frequency of food selection 99.92 (5.29) 101.93 (6.25) 1.388 .314
    Gustation of salt (%) 0.32 (0.14) 0.29 (0.12) -0.716 .190
    Cardiovascular risk factors
    Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 127.86 (17.55) 126.26 (16.21) -0.373 .707
    Body mass index (kg/m2) 23.96 (2.66) 26.08 (2.56) 3.197 .772
    Body fat rate (%) 24.78 (6.24) 29.63 (5.76) 3.177 .530
    Waist circumference (cm) 84.40 (7.37) 89.36 (7.09) 2.698 .954
    Total-cholesterol (mg/dl) 194.59 (37.91) 178.97 (35.24) -1.677 .202
    Triglyceride (mg/dl) 113.01 (42.61) 125.85 (43.50) 1.181 .901
    HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 49.76 (14.10) 44.44 (11.35) -1.613 .080
    LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 119.54 (32.11) 111.57 (29.28) -1.018 .327
    Glucose (mg/dl) 100.05 (15.72) 96.37 (13.63) -0.978 .392
    Variables Posttest scores
    Mean difference
    t p
    Experimental (n=37)
    Control (n=27)
    Experimental (n=37)
    Control (n=27)
    Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
    Self- efficacy 46.97 (9.55) 40.22 (9.80) 1.35 (8.37) -3.67 (8.42) -2.363 .021
    Diet behavior pattern
    Diet behavior 16.32 (2.14) 15.56 (2.03) 0.89 (2.08) 0.37 (2.22) -0.963 .339
    Frequency of food selection 101.92 (4.95) 99.56 (4.74) 2.00 (5.75) -2.37 (5.99) -2.950 .004
    Gustation of salt (%) 0.19 (0.13) 0.28 (0.14) -0.13 (0.16) -0.01 (0.15) 2.996 .004
    Cardiovascular risk factors
    Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 125.46 (15.76) 135.19 (15.91) -2.41 (15.05) 8.93 (11.92) 3.238 .002
    Body mass index (kg/m2) 24.15 (2.58) 26.39 (2.58) 0.19 (0.66) 0.31 (0.73) 0.700 .486
    Body fat rate (%) 26.18 (5.83) 30.67 (5.71) 1.41 (1.68) 1.04 (1.78) -0.851 .398
    Waist circumference (cm) 84.59 (7.05) 89.70 (7.67) 0.19 (3.06) 0.35 (3.92) 0.179 .858
    Total-cholesterol (mg/dl) 173.14 (30.75) 173.82 (30.64) -21.46 (41.34) -4.81 (22.12) 2.075 .042
    Triglyceride (mg/dl) 116.78 (57.72) 131.06 (41.04) -9.14 (71.89) 11.78 (60.38) 1.228 .224
    HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 45.00 (13.07) 42.22 (9.03) -4.76 (5.59) -2.22 (5.12) 1.856 .068
    LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 106.32 (29.73) 109.74 (39.92) -13.22 (31.56) -5.56 (18.48) 1.127 .264
    Glucose (mg/dl) 81.11 (17.27) 83.15 (11.25) -18.95 (22.04) -13.22 (14.83) 1.169 .247
    Table 1. Homogeneity Test for General and Disease-Related Characteristics between the Experimental and Control Groups (N=64)

    Multiple response.

    Table 2. Homogeneity Test for Self Efficacy, Diet Behavior Pattern and Cardiovascular Risk Factors between the Experimental and Control Groups

    Table 3. Mean Group Comparisons in Self Efficacy, Diet Behavior Pattern and Cardiovascular Risk Factors at the Posttest


    J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
    Close layer
    TOP