Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 41(6); 2011 > Article
Original Article
Effects of Interactive Pictorial Education on Community Dwelling Older Adult’s Self Efficacy and Knowledge for Safe Medication
Myonghwa Park
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2011;41(6):795-804.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.6.795
Published online: December 12, 2011

Associate Professor, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea

Associate Professor, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea

Address reprint requests to : Park, Myonghwa College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, 55 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 301-747, Korea Tel: +82-42-580-8328 Fax: +82-42-580-8309 E-mail: mhpark@cnu.ac.kr
• Received: May 30, 2011   • Revised: June 7, 2011   • Accepted: December 19, 2011

Copyright © 2011 Korean Society of Nursing Science

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 18 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 19 Scopus
prev next
  • Purpose
    The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of interactive pictorial education on community dwelling older Korean adults’ self-efficacy and knowledge for safe medication.
  • Methods
    A quasi-experimental, three-group pre- and post-intervention design was used in this study. The interactive pictorial education was designed to suit the learning patterns and psychomotor skills of older adults. The education content, dealing with safe medication, was delivered over three sessions. A total of 136 older adults from local senior centers were assigned to one of the three groups: a) interactive pictorial education plus information booklet (experimental); b) education only with information booklet (conventional); or c) no intervention (control).
  • Results
    Participants receiving interactive pictorial education had significantly higher self-efficacy (F=24.32, p<.001) and knowledge (F=24.26, p<.001) scores than the information booklet or control group at post intervention. Post-hoc analyses indicated that both the interactive pictorial and the information booklet groups had significantly higher self-efficacy and knowledge scores than the control group at the post-test point (p<.05). Furthermore, the interactive pictorial group had higher self-efficacy and knowledge scores than the information booklet group at the post-test point (p<.05).
  • Conclusion
    These results suggest that the interactive pictorial education is an innovative approach that provides a means for older adults to learn appropriate medication use to improve their own health. It empowers older adults with different literacy levels to enhance their self-efficacy and knowledge for the safe use of medication.
Figure 1.
Interactive pictorial map for education.
jkan-41-795f1.jpg
Figure 2.
Interactive pictorial cards for education.
jkan-41-795f2.jpg
Figure 3.
Changes in the scores of self-efficacy for three groups.
jkan-41-795f3.jpg
Figure 4.
Changes in the scores of knowledge for three groups.
jkan-41-795f4.jpg
Table 1.
Homogeneity Test for General Characteristics between the Experimental Group and Control Groups (N=136)
Characteristic Categories Interactive pictorial (n=45)
Information booklet (n=45)
Control (n=46)
χ² or F p
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Gender Male 21 (46.7) 22 (48.9) 22 (47.8) 10.50 .228
Female 24 (53.3) 23 (51.1) 24 (52.2)
Age (yr) 65-69 7 (15.6) 9 (20.0) 7 (15.6) 5.52 .523
70-74 12 (26.7) 14 (31.1) 11 (24.4)
75-79 10 (22.2) 10 (22.2) 13 (28.9)
≥80 16 (35.6) 12 (26.7) 14 (31.1)
M (SD) 76.0 (6.5) 74.6 (5.8) 76.8 (6.0) 76.0 (6.0)
Education None (illiterate) 4 (8.9) 5 (11.1) 5 (10.9) 6.91 .103
level None (literate) 6 (13.3) 6 (13.4) 7 (15.2)
Elementary 23 (51.1) 22 (48.9) 22 (47.8)
Middle school 10 (22.2) 11 (24.4) 10 (21.7)
≥High school 2 (4.4) 1 (2.2) 2 (4.4)
Marital status Married 20 (44.4) 20 (44.4) 19 (41.3) 1.90 .070
Bereavement 22 (48.9) 23 (51.2) 25 (54.3)
Divorced 3 (6.7) 2 (4.4) 2 (4.4)
Income Low 15 (33.3) 14 (31.1) 14 (30.4) 6.01 .786
Medium 17 (37.8) 20 (44.4) 20 (43.5)
High 13 (28.9) 11 (24.4) 12 (26.1)
Health Very good 5 (11.2) 7 (15.6) 5 (10.9) 2.05 .057
condition Good 12 (26.7) 9 (20.0) 13 (28.3)
Fair 20 (44.4) 21 (46.7) 19 (41.3)
Somewhat bad 6 (13.3) 6 (13.3) 8 (17.4)
Very bad 2 (4.4) 2 (4.4) 1 (2.1)
Number of 0 1 (2.2) 3 (6.7) 2 (4.3) 1.81 .454
medical 1 20 (44.4) 18 (40.0) 20 (43.6)
diagnosis 2 18 (40.0) 12 (26.7) 14 (30.4)
3 5 (11.1) 9 (20.0) 8 (17.4)
4 1 (2.3) 3 (6.6) 2 (4.3)
Number of 1-2 20 (44.4) 17 (37.8) 18 (39.1) 0.23 .891
medication 3-4 18 (40.0) 20 (44.4) 19 (41.3)
Over 5 7 (15.6) 8 (17.8) 9 (19.6)
Table 2.
Homogeneity Test for the Scores of Self-Efficacy and Knowledge between the Experimental Group and Control Groups (N=136)
Measurement Interactive pictorial (n=45)
Information booklet (n=45)
Control (n=46)
F p
Mean±SD Mean±SD Mean±SD
Self-efficacy 26.30±3.92 26.70±3.20 25.33±4.06 5.55 .406
Knowledge 8.36±1.88 8.11±2.09 8.03±1.81 2.60 .267
Table 3.
Result of Oneway ANOVA for Self Efficacy and Knowledge (N=134)
Source SS df Mean Square F p
Self Efficacy* 24.32 <.001
Between groups 734.01 2 367.01
Within groups 2,671.10 133 15.09
Total 3,405.11 135
Knowledge
Between groups 214.21 2 107.11 24.26 <.001
Within groups 781.45 133 4.42
Total 995.66 135

*post-hoc Tukey’s test: The interactive pictorial education plus information booklet group >education only with information booklet group >no intervention group;

post-hoc Tukey’s test: The interactive pictorial education plus information booklet group >education only with information booklet group >no intervention group.

  • Andrus M R &, Roth M T. 2002;Health literacy: A review. Pharmacotherapy. 22:282–302. doi: 10.1592/phco.22.5.282.33191.ArticlePubMed
  • Bandura A. 1986.Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. 2nd ed.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Bloom B. 1956.Taxonomy of educational objectives, hand-book 1: Cognitive domain. Longman, NY: David McKay.
  • Cohen J. 1988.Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc..
  • DiMatteo M R. 2004;Variations in patients’ adherence to medical recommendations: A quantitative review of 50 years of research. Medical Care. 42:200–209. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000114908.90348.f9.PubMed
  • Dowse R &, Ehlers M. 2005;Medicine labels incorporating pictograms: Do they influence understanding and adherence? Patient Education and Counseling. 58:63–70. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.06.012.ArticlePubMed
  • Fialova D, Topinkova E, Gambassi G, Schroll M, Onder G, Sorbye L W. . 2005;Potentially inappropriate medication use among elderly home care patients in Europe. Te Journal of the American Medical Association. 293:1348–1358. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.11.1348.Article
  • Grant J &, Davis L. 1997;Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing and Health. 20:269–274. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3<269::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.ArticlePubMed
  • Han K S, Moon S Y, Park H O &, Park E H. 2000;The survey on the drug use status, knowledge and attitude of college students -Seoul and northern part of the Kyunggi-do. Te Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 6:376–389.
  • Han J H. 2007;Te infuence of cognitive function, their family support and medication knowledge upon medication adherence in old people. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  • Hill L H. 2004;Concept mapping in a pharmacy communications course to encourage meaningful student learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 68:109. Article
  • Houts P S, Doak C C, Doak L G &, Loscalzo M J. 2006;The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Education and Counseling. 61:176–190.Article
  • Katz M Z, Kripalani S &, Weiss B D. 2006;Use of pictorial aids in medication instructions: A review of the literature. American Journal of Health System Pharmacy. 63:2391–2397. doi:10.2146/ajhp060162.ArticlePubMed
  • Kripalani S, Robertson R, Love-Ghaffari M A, Henderson L E, Praska J, Strawder A. . 2007;Development of an illustrated medication schedule as a low-literacy patient education tool. Patient Education and Counseling. 66:368–377. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.020.ArticlePubMed
  • Lee S &, Park M. 2010;A study on health literacy, medication knowledge, and medication misuse of rural elderly. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 30:485–497.
  • Lee J H &, Park M H. 2007;The effects of an education program for safe drug use in the rural elderly. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 37:295–304.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • Lee T H &, Kang S J. 2008;Actual condition and influence of Korean elderly health literacy. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 28:847–863.
  • Lin C A, Neafsey P J &, Strickler Z. 2009;Usability testing by older adults of a computer-mediated health communication program. Journal of Health Communication. 14:102–118. doi: 10.1080/10810730802659095.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • Mansoor L E &, Dowse R. 2004;Design and evaluation of a new pharmaceutical pictogram sequence to convey medicine usage. Ergonomics Society of South America. 2:29–41.
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2009.2008 Korean elderly survey. Seoul: The Author.
  • Molassiotis A, Nahas-Lopez V, Chung W Y, Lam S W, Li C K &, Lau T F. 2002;Factors associated with adherence to antiretroviral medication in HIV-infected patients. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 13:301–310. doi: 10.1258/0956462021925117.
  • Neafsey P J, Strickler Z, Shellman J &, Padula A T. 2001;Delivering health information about self-medication to older adults. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 27(11):19–27.Article
  • Neafsey P J, Anderson E, Coleman C, Lin C A, M’lan C E &, Walsh S. 2009;Reducing adverse self-medication behaviors in older adults with the next generation personal education program: Design and methodology. Journal of Patient Preference and Adherence. 6:323–334. doi: 10.1007/s12126-010-9085-9.
  • Owen S V. 1993.Professor test scoring manual (revised). Storrs, CT: Bureau of Educational Research and Service. University of Connecticut.
  • Park M S. 2008;Drug use in the elderly. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 15:195–205.
  • Risser J, Jacobson T A &, Kripalani S. 2007;Development and psychometric evaluation of the self-efficacy for appropriate medication use scale (SEAMS) in low-literacy patients with chronic disease. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 15:203–219. doi: 10.1891/106137407783095757.ArticlePubMed
  • Sawhney B B &, Reicherter E A. 2005;Literacy and the older adult: Educational considerations for health professionals. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 21:275–281.Article
  • Scherer Y K &, Bruce S. 2001;Knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy and compliance with medical regimen, number of emergency department visits, and hospitalizations in adults with asthma. Heart & Lung: Te Journal of Acute and Critical Care. 30:250–257. doi: 10.1067/mhl.2001.116013.Article
  • Shin K R, Kim J S, Kim J Y &, Yi H R. 2005;Effects of a drug misuse and abuse prevention program on knowledge, attitude, and preventive behaviors related to drug misuse and abuse, and depression in low-in-come elderly women. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 35:763–773.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • Sojourner R J &, Wogalter M S. 1998;The influence of pictorials on the comprehension and recall of pharmaceutical safety and warning information. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics. 2:93–106.
  • Wilson F L, Mood D &, Nordstrom C K. 2010;The influence of easy-to-read pamphlets about self-care management of radiation side effects on patients’ knowledge. Oncology Nursing Forum. 37:774–781. doi: 10.1188/10.ONF.774-781.ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Effects of Interactive Pictorial Education on Community Dwelling Older Adult’s Self Efficacy and Knowledge for Safe Medication
        J Korean Acad Nurs. 2011;41(6):795-804.   Published online December 12, 2011
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      • 0
      • 1
      • 2
      • 3
      We recommend
      Effects of Interactive Pictorial Education on Community Dwelling Older Adult’s Self Efficacy and Knowledge for Safe Medication
      Image Image Image Image
      Figure 1. Interactive pictorial map for education.
      Figure 2. Interactive pictorial cards for education.
      Figure 3. Changes in the scores of self-efficacy for three groups.
      Figure 4. Changes in the scores of knowledge for three groups.
      Effects of Interactive Pictorial Education on Community Dwelling Older Adult’s Self Efficacy and Knowledge for Safe Medication
      Characteristic Categories Interactive pictorial (n=45)
      Information booklet (n=45)
      Control (n=46)
      χ² or F p
      n (%) n (%) n (%)
      Gender Male 21 (46.7) 22 (48.9) 22 (47.8) 10.50 .228
      Female 24 (53.3) 23 (51.1) 24 (52.2)
      Age (yr) 65-69 7 (15.6) 9 (20.0) 7 (15.6) 5.52 .523
      70-74 12 (26.7) 14 (31.1) 11 (24.4)
      75-79 10 (22.2) 10 (22.2) 13 (28.9)
      ≥80 16 (35.6) 12 (26.7) 14 (31.1)
      M (SD) 76.0 (6.5) 74.6 (5.8) 76.8 (6.0) 76.0 (6.0)
      Education None (illiterate) 4 (8.9) 5 (11.1) 5 (10.9) 6.91 .103
      level None (literate) 6 (13.3) 6 (13.4) 7 (15.2)
      Elementary 23 (51.1) 22 (48.9) 22 (47.8)
      Middle school 10 (22.2) 11 (24.4) 10 (21.7)
      ≥High school 2 (4.4) 1 (2.2) 2 (4.4)
      Marital status Married 20 (44.4) 20 (44.4) 19 (41.3) 1.90 .070
      Bereavement 22 (48.9) 23 (51.2) 25 (54.3)
      Divorced 3 (6.7) 2 (4.4) 2 (4.4)
      Income Low 15 (33.3) 14 (31.1) 14 (30.4) 6.01 .786
      Medium 17 (37.8) 20 (44.4) 20 (43.5)
      High 13 (28.9) 11 (24.4) 12 (26.1)
      Health Very good 5 (11.2) 7 (15.6) 5 (10.9) 2.05 .057
      condition Good 12 (26.7) 9 (20.0) 13 (28.3)
      Fair 20 (44.4) 21 (46.7) 19 (41.3)
      Somewhat bad 6 (13.3) 6 (13.3) 8 (17.4)
      Very bad 2 (4.4) 2 (4.4) 1 (2.1)
      Number of 0 1 (2.2) 3 (6.7) 2 (4.3) 1.81 .454
      medical 1 20 (44.4) 18 (40.0) 20 (43.6)
      diagnosis 2 18 (40.0) 12 (26.7) 14 (30.4)
      3 5 (11.1) 9 (20.0) 8 (17.4)
      4 1 (2.3) 3 (6.6) 2 (4.3)
      Number of 1-2 20 (44.4) 17 (37.8) 18 (39.1) 0.23 .891
      medication 3-4 18 (40.0) 20 (44.4) 19 (41.3)
      Over 5 7 (15.6) 8 (17.8) 9 (19.6)
      Measurement Interactive pictorial (n=45)
      Information booklet (n=45)
      Control (n=46)
      F p
      Mean±SD Mean±SD Mean±SD
      Self-efficacy 26.30±3.92 26.70±3.20 25.33±4.06 5.55 .406
      Knowledge 8.36±1.88 8.11±2.09 8.03±1.81 2.60 .267
      Source SS df Mean Square F p
      Self Efficacy* 24.32 <.001
      Between groups 734.01 2 367.01
      Within groups 2,671.10 133 15.09
      Total 3,405.11 135
      Knowledge
      Between groups 214.21 2 107.11 24.26 <.001
      Within groups 781.45 133 4.42
      Total 995.66 135
      Table 1. Homogeneity Test for General Characteristics between the Experimental Group and Control Groups (N=136)

      Table 2. Homogeneity Test for the Scores of Self-Efficacy and Knowledge between the Experimental Group and Control Groups (N=136)

      Table 3. Result of Oneway ANOVA for Self Efficacy and Knowledge (N=134)

      post-hoc Tukey’s test: The interactive pictorial education plus information booklet group >education only with information booklet group >no intervention group;

      post-hoc Tukey’s test: The interactive pictorial education plus information booklet group >education only with information booklet group >no intervention group.


      J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
      Close layer
      TOP