REFERENCES

• 1. Kitajima Y, Nakamura M, Maeda J, Kanai-Pak M, Aida K, Huang Z, et al. Robotics as a tool in fundamental nursing education. In: Duffy VG, editor. Digital human modeling Applications in health, safety, ergonomics and risk management. Cham, CH: Springer International Publishing; 2014. p. 392–402.
• 2. Suwan N, Kasatpibal N, Sawasdisingha P. Effects of student-centered teaching on knowledge, practice, and satisfaction of clean techniques among second year nursing students. Singapore Nurs J. 2013;40(4):30–37.
• 3. Choi SH, So HS, Choi JY, Yoo SH, Yun SY, Kim MH, et al. Comparison of blended practicum combined e-learning between cooperative and individual learning on learning outcomes. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2014;20(2):341–349. Article
• 4. Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education. The accreditation nursing education: Core basic nursing skills protocol [Internet]. Seoul, Author. 2014;cited 2015 February 16. Available from: http://www.kabone.or.kr/HyAdmin/upload/goodFile/120140117153430.pdf
• 5. Paik HJ. Educational evaluation of competency in nursing skills through open laboratory self-directed practice. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 2004;11(1):13–20.
• 6. Kim HS. A study on relationship between stress of clinical practice and clinical competency in nursing students. J Korea Community Health Nurs Acad Soc. 2002;16(1):64–76.
• 7. Song S. The effect of self-evaluation method using video recording on competency in nursing skills, self-directed learning ability, problem solving ability and academic self-efficacy [master's thesis]. Seoul, Sungshin Women's University. 2013.
• 8. Shin EJ. A study related to self-efficacy, satisfaction with practice and fundamentals of nursing practicum. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 2008;15(3):380–386.
• 9. Jho MY. Effects of core fundamental nursing skills education on self-efficacy, clinical competence and practice satisfaction in nursing students. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 2014;21(3):292–301.Article
• 10. Cheon EY. The effects of video-aided peer feedback on enhancing nursing students' understanding of foley catheterization. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2013;19(1):43–51. Article
• 11. Cardoso AF, Moreli L, Braga FT, Vasques CI, Santos CB, Carvalho EC. Effect of a video on developing skills in undergraduate nursing students for the management of totally implantable central venous access ports. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(6):709–713. ArticlePubMed
• 12. Bashir GMM, Rahaman A, Galib SM, Rahaman MM. Smart phone based social networking for teaching & learning. Int J Comput Sci Mob Comput. 2014;3(4):151–155.
• 13. Park HG. A study on the smart learning service for smart phone [master's thesis]. Seoul, Konkuk University. 2011.
• 14. Kim YH. Satisfaction with evaluation method for fundamental nursing practical skill education through cell phone animation self-monitoring and feedback: Focus on foley catheterization. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 2008;15(2):134–142.
• 15. Yeun EJ. Effectiveness of video-record method on fundamental nursing skill education: Focused on intramuscular injection practice. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 1999;5(1):86–96.
• 16. Ji YR, Chung HM. Effects of case-based learning on task achievement and learning satisfaction in the university class. J Learner Cent Curriculum Instr. 2014;14(9):243–265.
• 17. Park WW, Ko SK. Procedures and methods of multilevel analysis: With a focus on WABA. Seoul J Bus. 2005;39(1):59–90.
• 18. McKenny K. Using an online video to teach nursing skills. Teach Learn Nurs. 2011;6(4):172–175. Article
• 19. Farquharson AL, Cresswell AC, Beard JD, Chan P. Randomized trial of the effect of video feedback on the acquisition of surgical skills. Br J Surg. 2013;100(11):1448–1453. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 20. Yoo MS, Son YJ, Kim YS, Park JH. Video-based self-assessment: Implementation and evaluation in an undergraduate nursing course. Nurse Educ Today. 2009;29(6):585–589. ArticlePubMed
• 21. Grant JS, Moss J, Epps C, Watts P. Using video-facilitated feedback to improve student performance following high-fidelity simulation. Clin Simul Nurs. 2010;6(5):e177–e184. Article
• 22. Park IH, Shin S. The effects of video-based peer assisted learning in standardized patients simulation: Pre and post operative care. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2015;27(1):73–82. ArticlePDF
• 23. Kang KS. Effectiveness of video-record method on fundamental nursing skill education: Focused on enema. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 1996;3(2):273–283.
• 24. Hong SH, Kwon YS. Nursing student's practice scores, confidence and satisfaction in fundamentals of nursing according to teaching method for self-directed practice. Keimyung J Nurs Sci. 2010;14(1):1–10.
• 25. Kim YH. Nursing students' performance and confidence in basic nursing skills after the completion of clinical practice: Focused on basic nursing skills of low performance [master's thesis]. Daegu, Keimyung University. 2002.
• 26. Bowden T, Rowlands A, Buckwell M, Abbott S. Web-based video and feedback in the teaching of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(4):443–447. ArticlePubMed
• 27. Eröz-Tu B. Reflective feedback sessions using video recordings. ELT J. 2012;67(2):175–183. Article
• 28. Ryoo EN, Park YS, Ha EH. Outcomes and satisfaction of simulationbased learning in nursing of patient with UGI bleeding. Korea Acad Ind Coop Soc. 2013;14(3):1274–1282. Article
• 29. Han KS, Park EH, Cho JY. An inquiry into subjectivity of fundamental nursing practice attitude. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2000;30(3):682–693.ArticlePDF
• 30. Shen W. Using video recording system to improve student performance in high-fidelity simulation. In: Li S, Jin Q, Jiang X, Park JJ, editors. Frontier and future development of information technology in medicine and education. Dordrecht, NL: Springer Netherlands; 2013. p. 1753–1757.
• 31. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Hira-SDA & Hira-RoB [Internet]. Seoul, Author. 2011;cited 2015 June 17. Available from: http://www.hira.or.kr/dummy.do?pgmid=HIRAA030067030000&cmsurl=/cms/medi_info/08/02/03/1205728_27027.html&subject=임상연구문헌분류도구및비뚤림위험평가도구Hira-SDA&Hira-RoB)#none

Figure 1

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; Item 1=Measuring vital sign; Item 2=Wearing protective equipment when entering and exiting the quarantine room and the management of waste materials; Item 3=Gavage tube feeding.

Table 1

Study Design

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; X₁=Self-directed feedback practice using smartphone videos; X₂=Self-directed practice; E ₁=Basic nursing skills and confidence in performance of 'Measuring vital sign' after self-directed feedback practice using smartphone videos; C₁=Basic nursing skills and confidence in performance of 'Measuring vital sign' after self-directed practice; E₂=Basic nursing skills and confidence in performance of 'Wearing protective equipment when entering and exiting the quarantine room and the management of waste materials' after self-directed feedback practice using smartphone videos; C₂=Basic nursing skills and confidence in performance of 'Wearing protective equipment when entering and exiting the quarantine room and the management of waste materials' after self-directed practice; E₃=Basic nursing skills and confidence in performance of 'Gavage tube feeding' after self-directed feedback practice using smartphone videos; C₃=Basic nursing skills and confidence in performance of 'Gavage tube feeding' after self-directed practice; E₄=Overall confidence in performance and learning satisfaction after self-directed feedback practice using smartphone videos; C₄=Overall confidence in performance and learning satisfaction after self-directed practice

Table 2

Homogeneity between the Experimental and Control Group (N=58)

^*Fisher's exact test; Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 3

Comparisons between the Experimental and Control Group (N=58)

^*Measuring vital sign; ^†Wearing protective equipment when entering and exiting the quarantine room and the management of waste materials; ^‡Gavage tube feeding; Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by