REFERENCES

• 1. Ministry of Health & Welfare. Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. Korea health statistics 2011: Korea national health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES V-2). Seoul: Ministry of Health & Welfare; 2012.
• 2. Chin YR, Lee IS, Lee HY. Effects of hypertension, diabetes, and/or cardiovascular disease on health-related quality of life in elderly Korean individuals: A population-based cross-sectional survey. Asian Nurs Res. 2014;8(4):267–273. Article
• 3. Korean Diabetes Association. Treatment guideline for type II diabetes mellitus [Internet]. Seoul, Author. 2013;cited 2014 December 12. Available from: http://www.diabetes.or.kr/pro/publish/guide_2013.php?mode=list
• 4. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977–986. ArticlePubMed
• 5. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–853.ArticlePubMed
• 6. Gu MO. A structural model for self care behavior and metabolic control in diabetic patient [dissertation]. Seoul, Seoul National University. 1992.
• 7. Korean Diabetes Association. Elderly Diabetes Investigation Team. Elderly diabetes mellitus. Seoul: Korea Medical Book Publisher; 2010.
• 8. Kim MK. Factors affecting the self-care behavior of elderly patients with diabetes [master's thesis]. Seoul, Korea University. 2011.
• 9. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
• 10. Song MS, Gu MO, Ryu SA, Kim MS. Effect of a self-care program promoting self-efficacy for community elders with diabetes. J Korean Gerontol Nurs. 2002;4(1):27–37.
• 11. Ko CH, Gu MO. The effects of a diabetic educational program for coping with problem situation on self-efficacy, self care behaviors, coping and glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2004;34(7):1205–1214.ArticlePDF
• 12. Hong MH, Yoo JW, Gu MO, Kim SA, Lee JR, Gu MJ, et al. A study on effects and their continuity of the self regulation education program in patients with type 2 diabetes. Korean Clin Diabetes. 2009;10(3):187–195.ArticlePDF
• 13. Choi EO. Effects of empowerment education program for the type 2 diabetics on the empowerment, self-care behavior and the glycemic control [dissertation]. Seoul, Seoul National University. 1998.
• 14. Lee HJ, Park KY, Park HS, Kim IJ. The effects of problem solving nursing counseling and intensified walking exercise on diabetic self-care, coping strategies, and glycemic control among clients with DM type II. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2005;35(7):1314–1324.ArticlePDF
• 15. Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RD. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2:CD003417Article
• 16. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. New York, NY: Guilford Publications; 1991.
• 17. Rollnick S, Miller WR, Butler CC. Motivational interviewing in health care: Helping patients change behavior. Shin SK Cho SH . Seoul: SigmaPress; 2009.
• 18. Hawkins SY. Improving glycemic control in older adults using a videophone motivational diabetes self-management intervention. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2010;24(4):217–232.ArticlePubMed
• 19. West DS, DiLillo V, Bursac Z, Gore SA, Greene PG. Motivational interviewing improves weight loss in women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(5):1081–1087. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 20. Calhoun D, Brod R, Kirlin K, Howard BV, Schuldberg D, Fiore C. Effectiveness of motivational interviewing for improving self-care among northern plains Indians with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Spectr. 2010;23(2):107–114. ArticlePDF
• 21. Welch G, Zagarins SE, Feinberg RG, Garb JL. Motivational interviewing delivered by diabetes educators: Does it improve blood glucose control among poorly controlled type 2 diabetes patients? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;91(1):54–60. ArticlePubMed
• 22. Lim SC. Motivational interviewing for people with diabetes mellitus. J Korean Diabetes. 2011;12(2):109–112. Article
• 23. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G^*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–1160. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 24. Hurley AC. Measuring self-care ability in patients with diabetes: The insulin management diabetes self-efficacy scale. In: Strickland OL, Waltz CF, editors. Measurement of nursing outcomes: Measuring client self-care and coping skills. 4th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 1990. p. 28–44.
• 25. Ferrans CE, Powers MJ. Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1985;8(1):15–24.PubMed
• 26. The DCCT Research Group. Reliability and validity of a diabetes quality-of-life measure for the diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT). Diabetes Care. 1988;11(9):725–732.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 27. Kim SM, Jo YH, Kim ES, Kang YC, Lee HS, Kwak KW, et al. Quality of life in the diabetic patients. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 1991;12(12):25–31.
• 28. Smith DE, Heckemeyer CM, Kratt PP, Mason DA. Motivational interviewing to improve adherence to a behavioral weight-control program for older obese women with NIDDM. A pilot study. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(1):52–54.PubMed
• 29. Yang JJ. The effects of telephone consulting follow-up on self care behaviors and self-efficacy in diabetic patients. J Korean Soc Health Educ Promot. 2003;20(3):269–280.
• 30. Weinger K, Jacobson AM. Psychosocial and quality of life correlates of glycemic control during intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;42(2):123–131. ArticlePubMed

Table 1

Motivational Interviewing Self-management Program for Elderly Patients with DM

DM=Diabetes mellitus.

Table 2

Homogeneity Test of Characteristics between Experimental and Control Groups (N=42)

^*Fisher's exact test; Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; DM=Diabetes mellitus.

Table 3

Homogeneity Test of Dependent Variables between Experimental and Control Group (N=42)

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 4

Effects of Motivational Interviewing Self-management Program for Elderly Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (N=42)

Exp.=Experimental group (n=21); Cont.=Control group (n=21).

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by