REFERENCES

• 1. Anderson B, Anderson JE, Yi MY. Stretching. Seoul: Nexusbook; 2001.
• 2. Annon JS. Behavioural treatment of sexual problems: Brief therapy. Hagerstown, MD: Joanna Cotler Books; 1977.
• 3. Brotto LA, Heiman JR, Goff B, Greer B, Lentz GM, Swisher E, et al. A psychoeducational intervention for sexual dysfunction in women with gynecologic cancer. Arch Sex Behav. 2008;37(2):317–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9196-xArticlePDF
• 4. Chun N. A structural equation model on sexual function in women with gynecologic cancer. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2008;38(5):639–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2008.38.5.639ArticlePubMed
• 5. Chun N. Effectiveness of PLISSIT model sexual program on female sexual function for women with gynecologic cancer. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2011;41(4):471–480. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.4.471ArticlePubMed
• 6. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
• 7. Derogatis LR, Rosen R, Leiblum S, Burnett A, Heiman J. The female sexual distress scale (FSDS): Initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. J Sex Marital Ther. 2002;28(4):317–330.ArticlePubMed
• 8. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G^*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 9. Han C, Kim HC, Kang SH, Moon DG, Kim JJ, Choi JY. Validity and reliability of Korean version of the female sexual distress scale (FSDS). Korean J Androl. 2004;22(2):68–74.
• 10. Jensen PT, Groenvold M, Klee MC, Thranov I, Petersen MA, Machin D. Longitudinal study of sexual function and vaginal changes after radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56(4):937–949.ArticlePubMed
• 11. Juraskova I, Butow P, Robertson R, Sharpe L, McLeod C, Hacker N. Post-treatment sexual adjustment following cervical and endometrial cancer: A qualitative insight. Psychooncology. 2003;12(3):267–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.639ArticlePubMed
• 12. Kalaitzi C, Papadopoulos VP, Michas K, Vlasis K, Skandalakis P, Filippou D. Combined brief psychosexual intervention after mastectomy: Effects on sexuality, body image, and psychological well-being. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96(3):235–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.20811ArticlePubMed
• 13. Katz A. Breaking the silence on cancer and sexuality: A handbook for healthcare providers. Pittsburgh, PA: Oncology Nursing Society; 2007.
• 14. Katz A. Woman cancer sex. Pittsburgh, PA: Hygeia Media; 2009.
• 15. King IM. A theory for nursing: Systems, concepts, process. New York, NY: Wiley; 1981.
• 16. Laumann EO, Paik A, Glasser DB, Kang JH, Wang T, Levinson B, et al. A cross-national study of subjective sexual well-being among older women and men: Findings from the global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35(2):145–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-005-9005-3ArticlePubMedPDF
• 17. Lee KH. A measure of marital intimacy. J Korean Home Econ Assoc. 1995;33(4):235–249.
• 18. Lim JS. The relationships of a self-enhancement bias, life events and subjective well-being in old-adults. Seoul, Ewha Womans University. 2004;Unpublished master's thesis.
• 19. Lyubomirsky S, Lepper HS. A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Soc Indic Res. 1999;46(2):137–155.
• 20. Manne S, Sherman M, Ross S, Ostroff J, Heyman RE, Fox K. Couples' support-related communication, psychological distress, and relationship satisfaction among women with early stagebreast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(4):660–670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.72.4.660ArticlePubMed
• 21. Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; 1970.
• 22. Nho JH, Park YS. Descriptive study on sexuality for women with gynecological cancer. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2012;18(1):17–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2012.18.1.17ArticlePubMed
• 23. Park JS, Lee YE. Effects of integrated menopause management program for middle aged woman. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2011;17(1):10–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2011.17.1.10ArticlePubMed
• 24. Park YS, Cho IS, Kim YM. A survey of urban middle-aged women's sexual function and sexual distress. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2007;13(4):254–261.ArticlePDF
• 25. Rivalta M, Sighinolfi MC, De Stefani S, Micali S, Mofferdin A, Grande M, et al. Biofeedback, electrical stimulation, pelvic floor muscle exercises, and vaginal cones: A combined rehabilitative approach for sexual dysfunction associated with urinary incontinence. J Sex Med. 2009;6(6):1674–1677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01238.xArticlePubMedPDF
• 26. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/009262300278597ArticlePubMed
• 27. Scott JL, Halford WK, Ward BG. United we stand? The effects of a couple-coping intervention on adjustment to early stage breast or gynecological cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(6):1122–1135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.72.6.1122ArticlePubMed

Figure 1

Conceptual framework of sexual health enhancement program.

Table 1

Sexual Health Enhancement Program

FSFI=Female sexual function index; FSDS=Female sexual distress scale.

Table 2

Baseline Characteristics of Participants (N=43)

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 3

Homogeneity Test for FSFI, Sexual Distress, Marital Intimacy and Subjective Happiness (N=43)

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; FSFI=Female sexual function index.

Table 4

Effectiveness of Sexual Health Enhancement Program (N=43)

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; FSFI=Female sexual function index.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by