Young Sun Ha; Yeon Hee Choi

doi:10.4040/jkan.2012.42.1.19

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 42(1); 2012 > Article

Original Article
Effectiveness of a Motivational Interviewing Smoking Cessation Program on Cessation Change in Adolescents: Young Sun Ha, Yeon Hee Choi; Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2012;42(1):19-27.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.1.19
Published online: February 29, 2012

¹Doctoral Student, College of Nursing, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.

²Professor, College of Nursing, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Choi, Yeon Hee. College of Nursing, Kyungpook National University, 101 Dongin-dong, Jung-gu, Daegu 700-422, Korea. Tel: +82-53-420-4925, Fax: +82-53-421-2758, yeonhee@knu.ac.kr

• Received: February 24, 2010 • Accepted: February 5, 2012

23 Views
0 Download

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
This study examined the effectiveness of an Adolescent Motivational Interviewing Cessation program on smoking cessation change. The study was done with a nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design.
Methods
The participants were 39 high school students from G city, who were in school from September 1 to October 30, 2009. The students were assigned to the experimental group (20) and participated in the motivational interviewing cessation program or to the control group (19) who did not participate. Data analyses involved χ²-test, independent t-test, Repeated Measures ANOVA, and utilized the SPSS program.
Results
The experimental group had significantly less daily smoking, nicotine dependence and smoking temptation in comparison to the control group. The experimental group had significantly higher stage of change in comparison to the control group.
Conclusion
The results of the study indicate that a motivational interviewing cessation program delivered to adolescents who smoke is an effective method of encouraging cessation, and can be utilized as an effective nursing intervention for adolescents who smoke.
Keywords: Motivation; Interview; Smoking cessation; Adolescent

This article is based on a part of the first author's master's thesis from Kyungpook National University.

REFERENCES

1. Byeon Y.S., Lee H.S. Relation of the blood pressure, lipids and body mass index by smoking status among adolescents. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2007;37:1020–1026.Article PubMed PDF
2. Chang S.O., Kim E.J., Kil S.Y., Seomun G.A., Lee S.J. Influential variables on intention and action to quit smoking between adoles cent smokers and adult smokers-Based on the transtheoretical model. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2005;35:1410–1419.Article PubMed PDF
3. DiClemente C.C., Prochaska J.O., Fairhurst S.K., Velicer W.F., Velasquez M.M., Rossi J.S. The process of smoking cessation: An analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1991;59:295–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.2.295.Article PubMed
4. Erol S., Erdogan S. Application of a stage based motivational interviewing approach to adolescent smoking cessation: The transtheoretical model-based study. Patient Education and Counseling. 2008;72:42–48.Article PubMed
5. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.G., Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;39:175–191.Article PubMed PDF
6. Hyun H.J., Ahn H.Y. An analysis of the research on effect of smoking cessation intervention. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing. 2008;19:469–477.
7. Jeong L.S., Youn B.B., Pi S.Y., Kang Y.J., Lee S.H. Smoking status and nicotine dependency of general high school students in Seoul. Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine. 1996;17:425–437.
8. Kim H.O., Jeon M.S. The relationship between smoking, drinking and the mental health in adolescents. Journal of Korean Academy of Public Health Nursing. 2007;21:217–229.
9. Kim S.Y., Seo M.A., Nam G.A., Lee H.H., Park J.H. Development of school-based smoking cessation program for Korean smoking adolescents. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2002;11:462–473.Article PDF
10. Kim Y.K., Park I.H., Park J.S. Meta-analysis of effects on adolescent smoking cessation programs in Korea. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2008;38:204–216.Article PubMed
11. Kohler C.L., Schoenberger Y.M., Tseng T.S., Ross L. Correlates of transitions in stage of change for quitting among adolescent smokers. Addictive Behaviors. 2008;33:1615–1618.Article PubMed
12. Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. 5th youth health behavior research online. 2010;Seoul, Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. (ISSN 2005-2456).
13. Lawendowski L.A. A motivational intervention for adolescent smokers. Preventive Medicine. 1998;27:A39–A46.Article PubMed
14. Lee C., Ko B.S., Lee M.S., Lee M.Y. Effect of attitude of parents and school on smoking status in high school students in a small city. Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine. 2006;27:278–287.
15. Lee H.S. A study on effective of vocational high school students' smoking cessation program operation: Focused on the transtheoretical model. Journal of Korea Community Health Nursing Academic Society. 2004;18:205–217.
16. Lim E.S., Lee C.Y., Lee Y.J., Kim J.A. Effects of "5&6 smoking cessation program" on perception, behavior, and physiology of high school smokers. Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion. 2007;24(4):115–130.
17. Lim Y.S., Lee J.H., Kim S.I., Ham J.S. Adolescent smoking behavior: Personality, motivation, nicotine dependence. Korean Journal of Youth Studies. 2003;10:461–479.
18. Miller W.R. Jo S.H. Sin S.K . Enhancing motivation for change in substance abuse treatment. 2007;U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (Original work published 1999).
19. Miller W.R, Rollink S. Jo S.H. Sin S.K . Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. 2006;New York, NY, The Guilford press. (Original work published 2002).
20. Pallonen U.E., Prochaska J.O., Velicer W.F., Prokhorov A.V., Smith N.F. Stages of acquisition and cessation for adolescent smoking: An empirical integration. Addictive Behaviors. 1998;23:303–324.Article PubMed
21. Park N.H. Predictors of stage of change for smoking cessation among adolescents utilizing the transtheoretical model. 2002;Busan, Pusan National University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
22. Plummer B.A., Velicer W.F., Redding C.A., Prochaska J.O., Rossi J.S., Pallonen U.E., et al. Stage of change, decisional balance, and temptations for smoking: Measurement and validation in a large, school-based population of adolescents. Addictive Behaviors. 2001;26:551–571.Article PubMed
23. Prokhorov A.V., Pallonen U.E., Fava J.L., Ding L., Niaura R. Measuring nicotine dependence among high-risk adolescent smokers. Addictive Behaviors. 1996;21:117–127.Article PubMed
24. Slesnick N., Meyers R.J., Meade M., Segelken D.H. Bleak and hopeless no more. Engagement of reluctant substance-abusing runaway youth and their families. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2000;19:215–222.Article PubMed
25. Velicer W.F., DiClemente C.C., Prochaska J.O., Brandenburg N. Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smokingstatus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985;48:1279–1289.Article PubMed
26. Velicer W.F., DiClemente C.C., Rossi J.S., Prochaska J.O. Relapse situations and self-efficacy: An integrative model. Addictive behaviors. 1990;15:271–283.Article PubMed

Table 1

Homogeneity Test for General Characteristics between Groups

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 2

Homogeneity Test for Smoking Behavior, Decisional balance, Temptation between Groups

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 3

Homogeneity Test for Stage of Change between Groups

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 4

Smoking Behavior, Decisional balance, Temptation between Groups according to the Time Intervals

^*Greenhouse-Geisser.

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; G=Group; T=Time.

Table 5

Stage of Change between Groups

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; PC=Precontemplation; C=Contemplation; P=Preparation; A=Action.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Effectiveness of a Motivational Interviewing Smoking Cessation Program on Cessation Change in Adolescents

J Korean Acad Nurs. 2012;42(1):19-27. Published online February 29, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.1.19

XML Download

We recommend

Related articles

Development and Effectiveness of Progressive Simulation Education Program on Medication Safety for Nursing Students

Effectiveness of a Motivational Interviewing Smoking Cessation Program on Cessation Change in Adolescents

Table 1

Homogeneity Test for General Characteristics between Groups

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 2

Homogeneity Test for Smoking Behavior, Decisional balance, Temptation between Groups

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 3

Homogeneity Test for Stage of Change between Groups

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 4

Smoking Behavior, Decisional balance, Temptation between Groups according to the Time Intervals

^*Greenhouse-Geisser.

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; G=Group; T=Time.

Table 5

Stage of Change between Groups

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; PC=Precontemplation; C=Contemplation; P=Preparation; A=Action.

Table 1 Homogeneity Test for General Characteristics between Groups

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 2 Homogeneity Test for Smoking Behavior, Decisional balance, Temptation between Groups

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 3 Homogeneity Test for Stage of Change between Groups

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 4 Smoking Behavior, Decisional balance, Temptation between Groups according to the Time Intervals

^*Greenhouse-Geisser.

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; G=Group; T=Time.

Table 5 Stage of Change between Groups

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; PC=Precontemplation; C=Contemplation; P=Preparation; A=Action.