Gaeul Joo; Kyeong-Yae Sohng

doi:10.4040/jkan.2010.40.2.247

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 40(2); 2010 > Article

Original Article
Gluteal Subcutaneous Fat Thickness Measured by Computed Tomography as an Estimate of Proper Gluteal Intramuscular Injections in Korean Adults: Gaeul Joo, Kyeong-Yae Sohng; Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2010;40(2):247-254.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2010.40.2.247
Published online: April 30, 2010

¹Research Assistant, College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

²Professor, College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Sohng, Kyeong-Yae. College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpo-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-701, Korea. Tel: 82-2-2258-7410, Fax: 82-2-2258-7772, sky@catholic.ac.kr

• Received: September 17, 2009 • Revised: September 18, 2009 • Accepted: March 30, 2010

17 Views
1 Download
7 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
To study the thickness of gluteal subcutaneous fat (SCF) and propose an adequate length for needle for gluteal intramuscular injections based on computed tomography (CT) measurements.
Methods
The thickness of gluteal SCF were measured and studied for 568 patients who visited a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea between January 2007 and February 2009 for routine health screening and who had abdominopelvic CT.
Results
The average thickness of gluteal SCF was 15.92±4.08 mm in males and 24.90±5.47 mm in females. The thickness of gluteal SCF differed significantly according to gender. The gluteal SCF thickness was greater than 20.4 mm for 54 (12.3%) of the 440 male patients and 99 (77.3%) of the 128 female patients.
Conclusion
The most common syringe needle used for gluteal intramuscular injections in Korea is a 23 G, 25.4 mm-needle. The SCF thickness must be less than 20.4 mm in order to reach the dorsogluteal muscles to a depth of at least 5 mm if this 25.4 mm needle is used. In many patients, especially in female patients, the 25.4 mm needles will result in improper intramuscular injections with the injection being into the SCF. Therefore an appropriate needle should be selected by considering the gender and SCF thickness of patients receiving gluteal intramuscular injections.
Keywords: Injections; Intramuscular; Needles; Subcutaneous fat

This article is a revision of the first author's master's thesis from the Catholic University of Korea.

REFERENCES

1. Beyea SC, Nicoll LH. Administration of medications via the intramuscular route: An integrative review of the literature and research-based protocol for the procedure. Applied Nursing Research. 1995;8:23–33.Article PubMed
2. Burbridge BE. Computed tomographic measurement of gluteal subcutaneous fat thickness in reference to failure of gluteal intramuscular injections. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal. 2007;58(2):72–75.PubMed
3. Chan VO, Colville J, Persaud T, Buckley O, Hamilton S, Torreggiani WC. Intramuscular injections into the buttocks: are they truly intramuscular? European Journal of Radiology. 2006;58:480–484.Article PubMed
4. Cockshott WP, Thompson GT, Howlett LJ, Seeley ET. Intramuscular or intralipomatous injections? The New England Journal of Medicine. 1982;307:356–358.Article PubMed
5. Haramati N, Lorans R, Lutwin M, Kaleya RN. Injection granulomas. Intramuscle or intrafat? Archives of Family Medicine. 1994;3:146–148.Article PubMed
6. Hesby A, Nicoll LH. Intramuscular injection: An integrative research review and guideline for evidence-based practice. Applied Nursing Research. 2002;15:149–162.Article PubMed
7. Kim CS. A study on the practice of intramuscular injection of staff nurses working in a hospital. Journal of Human Science. 1984;8:87–93.
8. Kim MJ, Park HS, Choi SH, Sohng KY, Kim HS, Nam JJ, et al. Fundamentals of nursing. 2005;2nd ed. Seoul, Hyunmoonsa.
9. Kim SJ, Lee SO, Kim MJ, Park JH, Jin EH, Son JT, et al. Fundamentals of nursing. 2005;7th ed. Seoul, Soomoonsa.
10. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Third national health survey results and in-depth analysis: health check up. 2007;04;Seoul, Author.
11. Korean Society for the Study of Obesity. The Asia-Pacific perspective: Redefining obesity and its treatment. 2006;02;Seoul, Author. (Original work published 2000).
12. Lenz CL. Make your needle selection right to the point. Nursing. 1983;13(2):50–51.Article
13. Lippert WC, Wall EJ. Optimal intramuscular needle-penetration depth. Pediatrics. 2008;122:556–563.PubMed
14. Mallett J, Dougherty L. Royal Marsden Hospital manual of clinical nursing procedures. 2000;5th ed. Oxford, Blackwell Science.
15. Analysis of 2007 Health Check Up Results. National Health Insurance Corporation data. 2009;01 06 Retrieved May 25, 2009. from http://www.nhic.or.kr/wbm/wbmc/wbmc_0400/wbmc_0405/wbmc_0405.html.
16. Newton M, Newton DW, Fudin J. Reviewing the big three injection routes. Nursing. 1992;22(2):34–41.Article
17. Nisbet AC. Intramuscular gluteal injections in the increasingly obese population: retrospective study. British Medical Journal. 2006;332:637–638.Article PubMed PMC
18. Poland GA, Borrud A, Jacobson RM, McDermott K, Wollan PC, Brakke D, et al. Determination of deltoid fat pad thickness. Implications for needle length in adult immunization. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997;277:1709–1711.Article PubMed
19. Rai S, Nandan N. Gluteal injections in increasingly obese population: Essential considerations for intramuscular injections. British Medical Journal. 2006;332:795.
20. Sohng KY, Park HS, Hong YH, Yun EJ, Lee KY, Cho BH, et al. Fundamentals of nursing II. 2008;Seoul, SooMoonsa.
21. Sohng KY, Park HS, Hong YH, Yun EJ, Lee KY, Cho BH, et al. Fundamentals of nursing Interventions and skills. 2009;Seoul, SooMoonsa.
22. Son JT, Jang EH, Ha NS, Lee HJ, Yang JH, Kim HM, et al. Fundamentals of nursing II. 2007;Seoul, Hyunmoonsa.
23. Zaybak A, Gunes UY, Tamsel S, Khorshid L, Eser I. Does obesity prevent the needle from reaching muscle in intramuscular injections? Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007;58:552–556.Article PubMed

Figure 1

CT image demonstrating the location of landmarks for gluteal fat measurement.

Table 1

General Characteristics of the Participants (N=568)

Table 2

Differences in Subcutaneous Fat Thickness between Gender (N=568)

SFT=subcutaneous fat thickness.

Table 3

Correlation of Age and BMI with Subcutaneous Fat Thickness (N=568)

SFT=subcutaneous fat thickness; BMI=body mass index.

Table 4

Regression of BMI with Subcutaneous Fat Thickness (N=568)

x=BMI; y=subcutaneous fat thickness.

Table 5

Difference of Subcutaneous Thickness between BMI Groups (N=568)

^*Scheffe's test.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Gluteal Subcutaneous Fat Thickness Measured by Computed Tomography as an Estimate of Proper Gluteal Intramuscular Injections in Korean Adults

J Korean Acad Nurs. 2010;40(2):247-254. Published online April 30, 2010

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2010.40.2.247

XML Download

Figure

We recommend

Gluteal Subcutaneous Fat Thickness Measured by Computed Tomography as an Estimate of Proper Gluteal Intramuscular Injections in Korean Adults

Figure 1 CT image demonstrating the location of landmarks for gluteal fat measurement.

Figure 1

Gluteal Subcutaneous Fat Thickness Measured by Computed Tomography as an Estimate of Proper Gluteal Intramuscular Injections in Korean Adults

Table 1

General Characteristics of the Participants (N=568)

Table 2

Differences in Subcutaneous Fat Thickness between Gender (N=568)

SFT=subcutaneous fat thickness.

Table 3

Correlation of Age and BMI with Subcutaneous Fat Thickness (N=568)

SFT=subcutaneous fat thickness; BMI=body mass index.

Table 4

Regression of BMI with Subcutaneous Fat Thickness (N=568)

x=BMI; y=subcutaneous fat thickness.

Table 5

Difference of Subcutaneous Thickness between BMI Groups (N=568)

^*Scheffe's test.

Table 1 General Characteristics of the Participants (N=568)

Table 2 Differences in Subcutaneous Fat Thickness between Gender (N=568)

SFT=subcutaneous fat thickness.

Table 3 Correlation of Age and BMI with Subcutaneous Fat Thickness (N=568)

SFT=subcutaneous fat thickness; BMI=body mass index.

Table 4 Regression of BMI with Subcutaneous Fat Thickness (N=568)

x=BMI; y=subcutaneous fat thickness.

Table 5 Difference of Subcutaneous Thickness between BMI Groups (N=568)

^*Scheffe's test.