Kae-Hwa Jo; Hyun Ji Lee

doi:10.4040/jkan.2009.39.1.21

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 39(1); 2009 > Article

Original Article
Factors related to Life Satisfaction in Young-Old, Old, and Oldest-Old Women: Kae-Hwa Jo, Hyun Ji Lee; Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2009;39(1):21-32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2009.39.1.21
Published online: February 28, 2009

¹Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Catholic University of Daegu, Korea.

²Assistant Professor, Department of Social Welfare, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Jo, Kae Hwa. Department of Nursing, Catholic University of Daegu, 3056-6 Daemyeong 4-dong, Nam-gu, Daegu 705-718, Korea. Tel: 82-53-650-4825, Fax: 82-53-621-4106, jokw@cu.ac.kr

• Received: May 20, 2008 • Accepted: January 13, 2009

13 Views
0 Download
13 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the level of life satisfaction and the significant factors which impact on life satisfaction of young-old (60-69 yr), old (70-79 yr), and oldest-old (80 yr or above) women.
Methods
The participants for this study were 289 elderly Korean women living in the city of Daegu and Kyongpook province. The data were collected using structured questionnaires. ANOVA, Chi-square, and multiple regression with the SPSS program were used to analyze the data.
Results
There were statistically significant differences among young-old, old, and oldest-old women regarding the existence of spouse, income, educational status, and religions. The model including variables related to physical, psychological, financial, and social aspects of life, explained variance of life satisfaction of elderly women differently, such as 55% of young-old, 37% of old, and 66% of oldest-old. Finally, self-esteem was the only predictor in explaining the level of life satisfaction among old women regardless age.
Conclusion
Based on the findings of the study, implications for practical services for elderly women and recommendations of further study are provided. Nursing interventions should be developed to improve life satisfaction of elderly women according to age differences.
Keywords: Elderly; Women; Life; Satisfaction

REFERENCES

1. Balts M, Balts P. The psychology of control and aging. 1986;Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Bowling A, Banister D, Sutton S, Evans O, Windsor J. A multidimensional model of the quality of life in older age. Aging & Mental Health. 2002;6:355–371.Article
3. Bowling A, Windsor J. Towards the good life. A population survey of dimensions of quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2001;2:55–81.
4. Cha SH, Han KH, Lee JH. Relationship between self-rated health and physical, mental, social health: Differences among three aged group. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 2002;22:173–190.
5. Chung HJ, Kim TH, Lee DS. Related variables of life satisfaction of elderly women living alone in Chonbuk-do Province. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 2000;20:49–70.
6. Chung SD. A comparative study on the successful aging for Korean elderly women and elderly men. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 2007;27:829–845.
7. Clipp EC. In: Quality of life. 2002;New York, NY, Springer Publishing Co..
8. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with the life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1985;49:71–75.Article PubMed
9. Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith H. Subjective well-being three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin. 1999;125:276–302.Article
10. Grundy E, Bowling A. Enhancing the quality of extended life years: Identification of the oldest old with a very good and very poor quality of life. Aging % Mental Health. 1999;3:199–212.Article
11. Hillerås P, Jorm AF, Herliltz A, Winbald B. Life satisfaction among the very old: A survey on a cognitively intact sample aged 90 years or above. International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 2001;52:71–90.Article PubMed PDF
12. Jeon MY, Choe MA, Chae YR. Effect of Korean traditional dance movement training on balance, gait and leg strength in home bound elderly women. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2000;30:647–658.Article PDF
13. Kim ML. The study of comparing the factors of affecting on the quality of life for young-old women and old-old women. Korean Journal of Social Welfare. 2006;58:197–222.
14. Kim MS, Park MJ. The impact of religion on the quality of life of the elderly. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 2000;20:29–47.
15. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–186.Article PubMed
16. Lee IJ. A study on the difference between the younger old and the older old: Comparison of the effects of stressful life events and social support on their health. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 1999;19:35–50.
17. Lee IS, Kim HS. Sexual life and life satisfaction of rural elderly. Journal of Korean Society of Public Health Nursing. 2007;21:158–170.
18. Lee SM, Lee EO. Nursing research. 2005;Seoul, Korea National Open University Press.
19. Park HS, Lee KJ. A study on the health behaviors, physical function, and life satisfaction for elderly women. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2007;13:115–122.Article PDF
20. Park JS. The effects of an elderly health promotion program on health promotion lifestyles, health status and quality of life in the elderly. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2004;34:1194–1204.Article PubMed PDF
21. Procidano ME, Heller K. Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: Three validation studies. American Journal of Community Psychology. 1983;11:1–24.Article PubMed PDF
22. Ro SO. A study on the physical, mental, and social factors influencing the health status of aged women in Korea. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 1996;2:47–58.Article PDF
23. Rogers RG. The effects of family composition, health, and social support linkages on mortality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1996;37:326–338.Article PubMed
24. Rosenberg M. Conceiving the self. 1979;New York, NY, Basic Books.
25. Schumm WR, Hall J. Characteristics of the Kansas Parental Satisfaction Scale among two samples of married parents. Psychological Reports. 1985;57:163–169.Article PDF
26. Shin JS, An HG, Kim HM, Yoo YJ, Kim KH, Chong IK, et al. Pain of elderly women with osteoarthritis. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2001;31:180–193.Article PDF
27. Smith J, Borchelt M, Maier H, Jopp D. Health and well-being in the young old and oldest old. Journal of Social Issues. 2002;58:715–732.Article
28. Sung KW. Comparison of ADL and satisfaction state of the elderly in institution and home. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 1999;19:105–117.
29. Wallhagen M. Perceived control and adaptation in elderly caregivers. 1990;Seattle, USA, University of Washington. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

Table 1

General Characteristics of Subjects (N=289)

Table 2

The Level of Life Satisfaction and related Variables according to Age Difference among Subjects (N=289)

^*p<.05; ^**p<.01; ^***p<.001.

Monthly income (thousand): 1=less than 300; 2=300-490; 3=500-990; 4=1,000-1,490; 5=1,500-1,990; 6=2,000-2,490; 7=more than 2,500.

Education: 1=none; 2=elementary school; 3=middle school; 4=high school; 5=college; 6=graduate school.

Perceived e.c.=perceived economic condition.

Table 3

Correlation among Predictable Variables of Subjects according to Age Difference among Subjects

^*p<.05; ^**p<.01; ^***p<.001.

Perceived e.c.=perceived economic condition.

Table 4

Comparison of Variables affecting Life Satisfaction of Subjects according to Age Difference (N=289)

^*p<.05; ^**p<.01;^***p<.001.

Perceived e.c.=perceived economic condition; Dummy variables: Spouse (0=no, 1=yes), Education (0=none, 1=elementary, middle, high school, college, and graduate school), Monthly income (0=under 990,000won, 1=over 1,000,000 won).

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Factors related to Life Satisfaction in Young-Old, Old, and Oldest-Old Women

J Korean Acad Nurs. 2009;39(1):21-32. Published online February 28, 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2009.39.1.21

XML Download

We recommend

Factors related to Life Satisfaction in Young-Old, Old, and Oldest-Old Women

Table 1

General Characteristics of Subjects (N=289)

Table 2

The Level of Life Satisfaction and related Variables according to Age Difference among Subjects (N=289)

^*p<.05; ^**p<.01; ^***p<.001.

Monthly income (thousand): 1=less than 300; 2=300-490; 3=500-990; 4=1,000-1,490; 5=1,500-1,990; 6=2,000-2,490; 7=more than 2,500.

Education: 1=none; 2=elementary school; 3=middle school; 4=high school; 5=college; 6=graduate school.

Perceived e.c.=perceived economic condition.

Table 3

Correlation among Predictable Variables of Subjects according to Age Difference among Subjects

^*p<.05; ^**p<.01; ^***p<.001.

Perceived e.c.=perceived economic condition.

Table 4

Comparison of Variables affecting Life Satisfaction of Subjects according to Age Difference (N=289)

^*p<.05; ^**p<.01;^***p<.001.

Table 1 General Characteristics of Subjects (N=289)

Table 2 The Level of Life Satisfaction and related Variables according to Age Difference among Subjects (N=289)

^*p<.05; ^**p<.01; ^***p<.001.

Monthly income (thousand): 1=less than 300; 2=300-490; 3=500-990; 4=1,000-1,490; 5=1,500-1,990; 6=2,000-2,490; 7=more than 2,500.

Education: 1=none; 2=elementary school; 3=middle school; 4=high school; 5=college; 6=graduate school.

Perceived e.c.=perceived economic condition.

Table 3 Correlation among Predictable Variables of Subjects according to Age Difference among Subjects

^*p<.05; ^**p<.01; ^***p<.001.

Perceived e.c.=perceived economic condition.

Table 4 Comparison of Variables affecting Life Satisfaction of Subjects according to Age Difference (N=289)