REFERENCES

• 1. Ahn YM, Kim MR. The relationship between early neo-maternal exposure, and maternal attachment, maternal self-esteem and postpartum depression in the mothers of NICU infants. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2005;35:798–809.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 2. Ainsworth MD. Attachment beyond infancy. The American Psychologist. 1989;44:709–716.PubMed
• 3. Belsky J, Gilstrap B, Robin M. Continuity and discontinuity in infant negative and positive emotionality: Family antecedents and attachment consequences. Developmental Psychology. 1991;27:421–431.Article
• 4. Belsky J, Rovine MJ. Nonmaternal care in the first year of life and the security of infant-parent attachment. Child Development. 1988;59:157–176.ArticlePubMed
• 5. Bowlby J. The making and breaking of affectional bonds. Aetiology and psychopathology in the light of attachment theory. An expanded version of the Fifthieth Maudsley Lecture, delivered before the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 19 November 1976. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 1977;130:201–210.PubMed
• 6. Dennis CL. Theoretical underpinning of breastfeeding confidence: A self-efficacy framework. Journal of Human Lactation. 1999;15:195–201.
• 7. Eiger MS, Olds SW. The complete book of breastfeeding. 1999;New York, NY, Workman Publishing.
• 8. Han GE. The relationship of maternal self-esteem and maternal sensitivity with mother-to-infant attachment. 2002;Seoul, Hanyang University. Unpublished master's thesis.
• 9. Heo SK. Factors affecting fostering stress among working mothers with pre-school children. 2006;Yongin, Dankook University. Unpublished master's thesis.
• 10. Hills-Bonczyk S, Avery M, Savik K, Potter S, Duckett L. Women's experiences with combining breastfeeding and employment. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 1992;35:257–266.
• 11. Isabella RA, Belsky J. Interactional synchrony and the origin of infant-mother attachment: A replication of study. Child Development. 1991;62:373–384.ArticlePubMed
• 12. Jaeger E, Weinraub M. McCartney K. Early nonmaternal care and infant attachment: In search of process. In: Child care and maternal employment: A social ecology approach. 1990;. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass. 19–35.
• 13. Kim YH, Choi JN, Cho YR, Ju HO. Comparison of maternal attachment and maternal role confidence between breast milk in sanitary pack feeding infant's mothers and bottle feeding infant's mothers of low birth weight infants in NICU. Journal of Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing. 2006;12:386–397.
• 14. Klaus MH, Kennell JH. Parent to infant bonding, setting the record straight. Journal of Pediatrics. 1982;102:575–576.Article
• 15. Kochanska G. Mother-child relationship, child fearfulness, and emerging attachment: A short-term longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology. 1998;34:480–490.ArticlePubMed
• 16. Lee SY, Kwon IS. A comparative study on maternal role confidence and parenting stress according to the infant's feeding method. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2006;12:231–239.ArticlePDF
• 17. Lodermilk DL, Perry SE. Maternity Nursing. 2003;6th ed. St. Louis, MO, Mosby Company.
• 18. Müller ME. A questionnaire to measure mother to infant attach. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 1994;2:129–141.PubMed
• 19. Ong G, Yap M, Li FL, Choo TB. Impact of working status on breast feeding in Singapore: Evidence from the National Breastfeeding Survey 2001. European Journal of Public Health. 2005;15:424–430.PubMed
• 20. Shin HJ, Park YJ, Kang HC. Prediction model on mother-infant attachment during the early postpartum period. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2004;34:504–514.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 21. Sung MH, Kim MK. A study of the effects of behavior contact in early mother-infant attachment. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2005;35:842–849.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 22. Symanski ME. Maternal-infant bonding. Prentice issues for the 1990s. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 1992;37:s67–s73.Article
• 23. Taveras EM, Capra AM, Braveman PA, Jensvold NG, Escobar GJ, Lieu TA. Clinical support and psychological risk factors associated with breastfeeding discontinuation. Pediatrics. 2003;112:108–115.PubMed
• 24. Taylor LS. Newborn feeding behavior and attaching. MCN. The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing. 1981;6:201–202.PubMed
• 25. Vogel A, Hutchison BL, Mitchell EA. Factors associated with the duration of breastfeeding. Obstetrical and Gynecology survey. 2000;55:416–417.Article
• 26. World Health Organization. WHO Global data bank on breastfeeding. 1996;Geneva, Author.
• 27. Yang YS. The effects of infant child care on infant-mother attachment security and emotion regulation. 2000;Seoul, Kyunghee University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
• 28. Yeo JH. Maternal psychosocial factors affecting breast feeding practice. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2007;13:149–156.ArticlePDF
• 29. Zinn B. Supporting the employed breastfeeding mother. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 2000;45:216–226.ArticlePDF

Figure 1

Research design.

Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; pp=postpartum; pr=after returning to work; X₁=breast feeding promotion program for working women; X₂=breast feeding education program; o₁=general, obstetric, occupational, and breast feeding characteristics (face-to-face); o₂=breast feeding continuation (face-to-face); o₃=breast feeding continuation (telephone); o₄=breast feeding continuation, mother-infant attachment, maternal sensitivity (mail).

Table 1

Homogeneity Test for General, Obstetric, Occupational Characteristics, and Characteristics related to Breast Feeding (N=45)

^*t-test; ^†Fisher's exact test.

Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

Table 2

Comparison of Breast Feeding Rate between Two Groups at Each Time Point (N=45)

pp=postpartum; pr=after returning to work; Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

Table 3

Comparison of Breast Feeding Level between Two Groups at Each Time Points (N=45)

pp=postpartum; pr=after returning to work; Exclusive=exclusive breast feeding; Partial=partial breast feeding; Bottle=bottle feeding; Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

Table 4

Comparison of Mother-Infant Attachment and Maternal Sensitivity between Two Groups (N=45)

Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by