Myungsun Yi; Ji Hyeon Oh; Hye Min Hwang; Eun Jin Kwon; Jeong-hee Lee; Eun Young Park

doi:10.4040/jkan.2011.41.4.568

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 41(4); 2011 > Article

Original Article
Hospital Workers' Experience with Hospital Evaluation Program: A Focus Group Study: Myungsun Yi, Ji Hyeon Oh, Hye Min Hwang, Eun Jin Kwon, Jeong-hee Lee, Eun Young Park; Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2011;41(4):568-579.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.4.568
Published online: August 31, 2011

¹Professor, College of Nursing & Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

²Doctoral Student, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

³QA Part Manager, Management Innovation Department, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

⁴Professor, Department of Nursing Science, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Park, Eun Young. Department of Nursing Science, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, 534-2 Yeonsu 3-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Inchon 406-799, Korea. Tel: +82-32-820-4207, Fax: +82-32-820-4201, parkeunyoung@gachon.ac.kr

• Received: January 12, 2011 • Accepted: August 4, 2011

167 Views
1 Download
16 Crossref
6 Scopus

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of the study was to understand and describe the hospital workers' experience related to the hospital evaluation program implemented in Korea between 2004 and 2009.
Methods
During 2010, data were collected using focus group interviews. Four focus group interviews were held with a total of 28 hospital workers participating. All interviews were recorded and transcribed as they were spoken, and data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
Results
Nine themes emerged from the analysis: 1) Positive change in the necessity of the evaluation; 2) Improvement in the hospital system, facilities, and human resources; 3) Unity through cooperation among departments; 4) Nursing work overload; 5) Lack of physicians' awareness and responsibilities; 6) Unfair and unrealistic evaluation items; 7) Lack of credibility of the outcome; 8) Shifting responsibility for negative outcomes to the workers; 9) Lack of pragmatic utility.
Conclusion
The results of the study demonstrate that the hospital evaluation program played a key role in improving some work environments and communication among departments. At the same time, they show various negative themes resulting from the context of very authoritarian hospital systems and a connection-oriented society in Korea.
Keywords: Qualitative research; Focus groups; Health care evaluation mechanism; Hospital worker

REFERENCES

1. Bae JI. A study on hospital staff: A perception of and attitudes toward the medical institute accreditation system-Focused on those working for the public hospital. 2009;Seoul, Yonsei University. Unpublished master's thesis.
2. Brink PJ, Wood MJ. Advanced design in nursing research. 1989;Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
3. Cavanagh S. Content analysis: Concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher. 1997;4(3):5–16.Article
4. Denzin NK. Denzin NK. Strategies of multiple triangulation. In: The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. 1989;3rd ed. New Jersey, Prentice Hall. 234–247.
5. Downe-Wamboldt B. Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International. 1992;13:313–321.Article PubMed
6. Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Health sector accreditation research: A systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2008;20:172–183. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn005.Article PubMed
7. Greenfield D, Pawsey M, Naylor J, Braithwaite J. Are accreditation surveys reliable? International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2009;22:105–116. doi: 10.1108/09526860910944601.Article PubMed
8. Han WS. The effect of the hospital evaluation program to business performance in medical service organization-General hospital employee point of view. 2007;Daejon, Konyang University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
9. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Development of standard for evaluation of appropriateness of health insurance: Department for efficacy of resource utility. 2010;Seoul, Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service.
10. Kim E, Kang M, Kim Y, Park JH, Park JH. Opinions and strategies on the national hospital evaluation program. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2007;13:40–52.
11. Kim SC. How can hospitals improve quality in hospital quality assessment program? Journal of Korean Society of Quality Assurance in Health Care. 1994;1(2):30–33.
12. Kreuger RA. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. 1994;2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, Inc.
13. Lecompte MD, Goetz JP. Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research. 1982;52(1):31–60.Article PDF
14. Lee S. Background of hospital quality assessment. Journal of Korean Society of Quality Assurance in Health Care. 1994;1(2):2–10.
15. Lee SH. Problems and opinions on the national hospital accreditation program 2004. Journal of Korean Hospital Association. 2005;34(9):32–42.
16. Lee SM, Kim JY, Cho WH. Opinions on the national hospital accreditation program 2007. Journal of Korean Society of Quality Assurance in Health Care. 2008;14(2):89–100.
17. Ministry of Health & Welfare, & Korea Health Industry Development Institute. Guidelines for hospital services evaluation programme. 2004;Seoul, Korea Health Industry Development Institute.
18. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 1990;2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
19. Sandelowski M. The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science. 1986;8(3):27–37.Article PubMed
20. Spradley J. The ethnographic interview. 1979;New York, Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
21. Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN. Focus groups: Theory and practice. 1990;Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, Inc.
22. Yi GE. A study on the recognition of mid sized hospital employee about the hospital evaluation. 2009;Busan, Catholic University of Pusan. Unpublished master's thesis.
23. Yoo M, Chung M. The relationship among the perception of quality assurance and national hospital evaluation program and nursing performance of hospital nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2008;14:260–267.

Table 1

Characteristics of the Focus Group Interviews

QI=Quality improvement.

Table 2

Characteristics of the Participants (N=28)

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Concept analysis of end-of-life care competency of long-term-care-hospital nurses: Using a hybrid model
Sookyeon Son, Mi-Kyeong Jeon
Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2024; 26(1): 19. CrossRef
Healthcare Consumers’ Perceptions of Specialty Hospitals through a Focus Group Interview
Ji Eun Kim, Myung-Il Hahm
Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service Research.2023; 3(1): 37. CrossRef
A comparative analysis of the work environments for registered nurses, nurse aides, and caregivers using the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey
Sung Shin Kim, Yun Jin Kim, Jun Sik Park, Seoung Hee Ho, Hyosun Kweon, Young-Hyeon Bae
BMC Nursing.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The Effect of Occupational Stress among Occupational Groups Related to Healthcare Accreditation on Turnover Intention
So-Hee Nam, Yeon-Jeong Heo
Quality Improvement in Health Care.2022; 28(1): 55. CrossRef
Work Experience of Nurses in Charge of Adequacy Evaluation of Small and Medium Sized Hospitals
Sohee Nam, Jaehee Jeon, Yeon Jeong Heo
Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing.2021; 14(3): 99. CrossRef
Experiences of Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem-cell Donors and Experts of Relevant Institutions
Soyoung Yu, Miok Kim, Tai-Gyu Kim, Su-Hee Beom
Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2019; 31(5): 522. CrossRef
Factors Influencing Resilience in Long-term Care Hospital Nurses
Ju Hui Moon, Sook Hee Yoon
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2019; 25(5): 373. CrossRef
Integration and Efficiency Strategies of Evaluations for Medical Institutions
Kyung-Sook Kim
Quality Improvement in Health Care.2018; 24(1): 30. CrossRef
Incorporating work experience of medical staff into patient safety climate management: a multi-group analysis
Seung-Hwan Kim, Shao-Jen Weng
BMC Health Services Research.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Grounded Theoretical Analysis on the Hospital Accreditation Experience of Head Nurses in General Hospitals
Ji-Hyun Moon, Ga Eul Joo, Jinhwa Lee
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2016; 22(5): 437. CrossRef
Perception related to the Healthcare Accreditation Effects on Turnover Intention and Job Stress of employees' Quality Improvement Department
Young-Hi Heo, Jung-Ae Park
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society.2016; 17(12): 659. CrossRef
Factors Influencing Turnover Intention of Nurses after Evaluation for Certification at Geriatric Hospitals: Focused on Job Stress and Burnout
Eun Joung Choi, Ji Won Park, Mi Lim Cho
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society.2016; 17(3): 438. CrossRef
Assimilating to Hierarchical Culture: A Grounded Theory Study on Communication among Clinical Nurses
MinYoung Kim, Seieun Oh, Sheila Alexander
PLOS ONE.2016; 11(6): e0156305. CrossRef
Effects of Perception of the Healthcare Accreditation, and Job Stress on Turnover Intention in Nurses
Mi Ja Kim, Jeong Sil Choi
Journal of muscle and joint health.2015; 22(2): 87. CrossRef
Relationships of Nurses' Perception, Nursing Performance, Job Stress, and Burnout in Relation to the Joint Commission International Hospital Accreditation
Nam Young Yang, Jeong Sil Choi
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2014; 20(1): 1. CrossRef
Factors Influencing Organizational Commitment Experienced the JCI(Joint Commission International) in Hospital Nurses
Jeong Sil Choi, Nam Young Yang
Journal of Digital Convergence.2014; 12(6): 439. CrossRef

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format: