-
Wheel of Wellness Counseling in Community Dwelling, Korean Elders: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
-
So-Hi Kwon
-
J Korean Acad Nurs 2015;45(3):459-468. Published online June 30, 2015
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2015.45.3.459
-
-
 Abstract
 PDF
-
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Wheel of Wellness counseling on wellness lifestyle, depression, and health-related quality of life in community dwelling elderly people.
Methods
A parallel, randomized controlled, open label, trial was conducted. Ninety-three elderly people in a senior welfare center were randomly assigned to two groups: 1) A Wheel of Wellness counseling intervention group (n=49) and 2) a no-treatment control group (n=44). Wheel of Wellness counseling consisted of structured, individual counseling based on the Wheel of Wellness model and provided once a week for four weeks. Wellness lifestyle, depression, and health-related quality of life were assessed pre-and post-test in both groups.
Results
Data from 89 participants were analyzed. For participants in the experimental group, there was a significant improvement on all of the wellness-lifestyle subtasks except realistic beliefs. Perceived wellness and depression significantly improved after the in the experimental group (n=43) compared to the control group (n=46) from pre- to post-test in the areas of sense of control (p=.033), nutrition (p=.017), exercise (p=.039), self-care (p<.001), stress management (p=.017), work (p=.011), perceived wellness (p=.019), and depression (p=.031). One participant in the intervention group discontinued the intervention due to hospitalization and three in the control group discontinued the sessions.
Conclusion
Wheel of Wellness counseling was beneficial in enhancing wellness for the community-dwelling elderly people. Research into long-term effects of the intervention and health outcomes is recommended.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by  - The Effect of Lifestyle Interventions on Anxiety, Depression and Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Sohrab Amiri, Nailah Mahmood, Syed Fahad Javaid, Moien AB Khan
Healthcare.2024; 12(22): 2263. CrossRef - Lifestyle interventions improving health-related quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials
Sohrab Amiri, Nailah Mahmood, Sameeha Junaidi, Moien AB Khan
Journal of Education and Health Promotion.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Meaning of wellness in caring science based on Rodgers's evolutionary concept analysis
Monica Eriksson, Anette Ekström‐Bergström, Susann Arvidsson, Henrika Jormfeldt, Stina Thorstensson, Ulrica Åström, Ingela Lundgren, Åsa Roxberg
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences.2024; 38(1): 185. CrossRef - Non–Exercise-Based Interventions to Support Healthy Aging in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Wei Qi Koh, Nutyathun Wora, Natasha Wing Laam Liong, Kristiana Ludlow, Nancy A Pachana, Jacki Liddle, Patricia C. Heyn
The Gerontologist.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - The Effect of Lifestyle Interventions on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Participation Domain in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sachi O’Hoski, Stephanie Chauvin, Brenda Vrkljan, Marla K Beauchamp, Patricia C Heyn
The Gerontologist.2022; 62(6): e304. CrossRef - Wellness and wellness counseling: History, status, and future
Michael D. Brubaker, Thomas J. Sweeney
Counselor Education and Supervision.2022; 61(1): 25. CrossRef - Behaviour change techniques in personalised care planning for older people: a systematic review
Sadia Ahmed, Anne Heaven, Rebecca Lawton, Gregg Rawlings, Claire Sloan, Andrew Clegg
British Journal of General Practice.2021; 71(703): e121. CrossRef - Lifestyle medicine for depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Vincent Wing-Hei Wong, Fiona Yan-Yee Ho, Nga-Kwan Shi, Jerome Sarris, Ka-Fai Chung, Wing-Fai Yeung
Journal of Affective Disorders.2021; 284: 203. CrossRef - Intervención multidimensional preventiva de dependencia de personas mayores del centro integral para el envejecimiento feliz
María Teresa Valenzuela, Claudia Rodríguez, Ignacio Pérez, Luis Sarmiento, Pamela San Martín
Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes.2021; 32(4): 466. CrossRef - A review on healthy ageing interventions addressing physical, mental and social health of independent community-dwelling older adults
Betsy Seah, Yanika Kowitlawakul, Ying Jiang, Emily Ang, Srinivasan Chokkanathan, Wenru Wang
Geriatric Nursing.2019; 40(1): 37. CrossRef - Intervenções educativas para promoção da saúde do idoso: revisão integrativa
Khelyane Mesquita de Carvalho, Cynthia Roberta Dias Torres Silva, Maria do Livramento Fortes Figueiredo, Lídya Tolstenko Nogueira, Elaine Maria Leite Rangel Andrade
Acta Paulista de Enfermagem.2018; 31(4): 446. CrossRef - Validity and reliability of a Korean version of the wellness evaluation of lifestyle (K-WEL)
Hee Sook Kim, Yeonungsuk Song, So-Hi Kwon
Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society.2016; 27(6): 1609. CrossRef
-
291
View
-
6
Download
-
12
Crossref
-
Development and Validation of the Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale
-
So-Hi Kwon
-
J Korean Acad Nurs 2011;41(3):374-381. Published online June 13, 2011
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.3.374
-
-
Abstract
PDF
-
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a hospice·palliative care performance measure which would cover more than just physical symptoms or quality of life.
Methods
Through an intensive literature review, the author chose questions that measured aspects of physical, emotional, spiritual, social, or practical domains pertinent to hospice·palliative care for inclusion in the scale. Content validation of the questions was established by 15 hospice·palliative care professionals. A preliminary Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale (HPCPS) of 20 questions was administered to 134 pairs of terminal cancer patients from 5 hospice palliative care units and their main family caregiver. A validation study was conducted to evaluate construct validity and internal consistency.
Results
Factor analysis showed 14 significant questions in five subscales; Physical, Emotional, Spiritual, Social, and Patient' rights. There were no significant differences between the ratings by patients and family members except for three out of the 14 questions. The measure demonstrated construct validity, and Cronbach's α of the subscales ranged from .73 to .79.
Conclusion
The HPCOS demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability. It can be used to assess effectiveness of hospice·palliative care for terminal cancer patients in practice and research.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by - Evaluation of Outcomes of the Busan Community-based Palliative Care Project in Korea
Soon-Ock Choi, Sook-Nam Kim, Seong-Hoon Shin, Ji-Seon Ryu, Jeong-Won Baik, Jung-Rim Kim, Nae-Hyeon Kim
Asian Nursing Research.2018; 12(4): 286. CrossRef - Analysis of Knowledge About, Attitude Toward, and Educational Needs for Dementia in Certified Caregivers
Eun-Ho Ha, Jin-Young Cho
The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education.2015; 21(1): 108. CrossRef - Development and Validation of the Measurement Tool of Public Benefits in Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Center
Kunsei Lee, Eunyoung Shin, Hyoseon Jeong, Jung-Hyun Lee, Hee-Sook Kim, Young Sil Lim, Young Taek Kim
Health Policy and Management.2013; 23(4): 434. CrossRef
-
212
View
-
3
Download
-
3
Crossref
|
KSNS
E-SUBMISSION
