Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 46(6); 2016 > Article
Original Article
Frailty and its related Factors in Vulnerable Elderly Population by Age Groups
Eunok Park1, Mi Yu2
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2016;46(6):848-857.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2016.46.6.848
Published online: December 15, 2016

1College of Nursing, Jeju National University, Jeju

2College of Nursing·Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea

1College of Nursing, Jeju National University, Jeju

2College of Nursing·Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea

Address reprint requests to : Yu, Mi College of Nursing, Gyeongsang National University, 816 beongil-15, Jinju-daero, Jinju, Gyeongnam 52727, Korea Tel: +82-55-772-8229 Fax: +82-55-772-8222 E-mail: yumi825@gnu.ac.kr
• Received: June 6, 2016   • Revised: September 8, 2016   • Accepted: September 29, 2016

Copyright © 2016 Korean Society of Nursing Science

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs License. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0) If the original work is properly cited and retained without any modification or reproduction, it can be used and re-distributed in any format and medium

  • 15 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 6 Scopus
prev next
  • Purpose
    This study aimed to investigate factors affecting frailty by age groups among vulnerable elders in Korea.
  • Methods
    In this secondary analysis, data were collected from records for 22,868 elders registered in the Visiting Health Management program of Public Health Centers in 2012. Health behaviors, clinically diagnosed disease, frailty, depression and cognitive condition were assessed. Data were analyzed using stepwise regression to determine the associated factors of frailty by age group.
  • Results
    Alcohol consumption, physical activity, number of diseases, DM, CVA, arthritis, urinary incontinence, depression and cognitive condition were found to be factors significantly associated with frailty among the elders aged 65~74 (F=135.66, p<.001). Alcohol consumption, physical activity, CVA, arthritis, urinary incontinence, depression and cognitive condition were found to be factors associated with frailty in the elders aged 75~84 (F=245.40, p<.001). Physical activity, CVA, arthritis, depression and cognitive condition were factors associated with frailty in the elders over 85 years of age (F=96.48, p<.001).
  • Conclusion
    The findings show that frailty of elders and associated factors were different by age group, and common factors affecting frailty were physical activity, CVA, arthritis, depression and cognitive condition. Thus, these factors should be considered in the development of intervention program for care and prevention of frailty and program should be modified according to age group.
Table 1.
Differences in Variables by Age Group (N=22,868)
Characteristics Categories n 65~74 yr (n=9,032) 75~84 yr (n=11,530) Over 85 yr (n=2,306) χ2 p
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Gender Male 4,809 1,987 (22.0) 2,380 (20.6) 442 (19.2) 10.98 .004
  Female 18,059 7,045 (78.0) 9,150 (79.4) 1,864 (80.8)    
Smoking  No 21,132 8,325 (92.8) 10,665 (93.2) 2,142 (93.7) 2.91 .233
Yes 1,573 649 (7.2) 780 (6.8) 144 (6.3)    
Alcohol consumption  No Yes 18,714 4,154 7,179 1,853 (79.5) (20.5) 9,536 1,994 (82.7) (17.3) 1,999 307 (86.7) (13.3) 75.98   <.001  
Physical activity No Yes 21,889 979 8,545 487 (94.6) (5.4) 11,084 446 (96.1) (3.9) 2,260 46 (98.0) (2.0) 61.41   <.001  
Skipping breakfast No 22,664 8,947 (99.1) 11,429 (99.1) 2,288 (99.2) 0.60 .740
Yes 204 85 (0.9) 101 (0.9) 18 (0.8)    
No. of diseases None 1~2 2,110 17,559 980 6,827 (10.9) (75.6) 937 8,871 (8.1) (76.9) 193 1,861 (8.4) (80.7) 73.09   <.001  
≥3 3,199 1,225 (13.6) 1,722 (14.9) 252 (10.9)    
Hypertension No Yes 8,684 14,184 3,724 5,308 (41.2) (58.8) 4,129 7,401 (35.8) (64.2) 831 1,475 (36.0) (64.0) 67.26   <.001  
Diabetes mellitus No 18,395 7,053 (78.1) 9,317 (80.8) 2,025 (87.8) 112.41 <.001
Yes 4,473 1,979 (21.9) 2,213 (19.2) 281 (12.2)    
CVA No Yes 21,457 1,411 8,460 572 (93.7) (6.3) 10,783 747 (93.5) (6.5) 2,214 92 (96.0) (4.0) 21.25   <.001  
Arthritis  No Yes 7,810 15,058 3,477 5,555 (38.5) (61.5) 3,687 7,843 (32.0) (68.0) 646 1,660 (28.0) (72.0) 138.68   <.001  
Urinary incontinence No 22,344 8,845 (97.9) 11,246 (97.5) 2,253 (97.7) 3.49 .175
Yes 524 187 (2.1) 284 (2.5) 53 (2.3)    
Depression No 13,339 5,651 (62.6) 6,469 (56.1) 1,219 (52.9) 141.89 <.001
Mild 8,765 3,156 (34.9) 4,642 (40.3) 967 (41.9)
Severe 764 225 (2.5) 419 (3.6) 120 (5.2)
Cognitive condition Normal 18,534 7,866 (87.1) 9,159 (79.4) 1,509 (65.4) 600.00 <.001
Dementia 4,334 1,166 (12.9) 2,371 (20.6) 797 (34.6)
Frailty Not frail 18,765 8,104 (89.7) 9,222 (80.0) 1,439 (62.4) 999.50 <.001
Frail 4,103 928 (10.3) 2,308 (20.0) 867 (37.6)
Variables Range M±SD M±SD M±SD F p
Frailty 0~20 2.21a±3.02 3.30b±3.55 5.08c±4.44 692.78 <.001
Depression 0~15 4.24a±2.11 4.57b±2.27 4.84c±2.37 90.41 <.001
Cognitive condition 0~30 22.55a±4.67 20.82b±4.81 18.78c±5.14 684.41 <.001

a, b, c: post-hoc (Scheffé) comparison results for ANOVA. Different letters present that mean difference is significant with other groups.

Table 2.
Frailty by Age Group
Characteristics Categories 65~74 yr (n=9,032) 75~84 yr (n=11,530) Over 85 yr (n=2,306)
M ±SD t p M ±SD t p M ±SD t p
Smoking No 2.24 ±3.04 2.98 .003 3.29 ±3.55 -0.07 .945 5.09 ±4.43 -0.22 .829
Yes 1.90 ±2.75 3.30 ±3.45 5.17 ±4.68
Alcohol No 2.33 ±3.15 8.10 <.001 3.39 ±3.63 6.87 <.001 5.20 ±4.49 3.55 <.001
consumption  Yes 1.78 ±2.42 2.85 ±3.09 4.32 ±3.99
Physical activity No 2.26 ±3.03 6.39 <.001 3.36 ±3.55 9.68 <.001 5.13 ±4.45 5.86 <.001
Yes 1.43 ±2.78 1.85 ±3.22 2.63 ±2.82
Skipping breakfast No 2.22 ±3.02 2.07 .041 3.29 ±3.55 -1.54 .127 5.07 ±4.42 -1.07 .301
Yes 1.67 ±2.42 3.94 ±4.22 6.67 ±6.34
Hypertension No 2.17 ±3.02 -1.12 .261 3.19 ±3.55 -2.55 .011 5.19 ±4.67 0.85 .398
Yes 2.24 ±3.02 3.36 ±3.55 5.02 ±4.31
Diabetes mellitus No 2.17 ±2.97 -2.57 .010 3.26 ±3.52 -2.11 .035 5.12 ±4.45 1.06 .288
Yes 2.37 ±3.18 3.45 ±3.70 4.82 ±4.39
CVA No 2.11 ±2.92 -9.57 <.001 3.20 ±3.48 -8.98 <.001 5.05 ±4.42 -1.68 .097
Yes 3.73 ±3.97 4.65 ±4.30 5.91 ±4.87
Arthritis No 1.85 ±3.06 -8.90 <.001 2.73 ±3.53 -11.91 <.001 4.51 ±4.46 -3.88 <.001
Yes 2.44 ±2.97 3.57 ±3.53 5.31 ±4.41
Urinary No 2.19 ±3.00 -4.10 <.001 3.27 ±3.53 -4.57 <.001 5.05 ±4.44 -2.28 .023
incontinence  Yes 3.30 ±3.69     4.40 ±4.13     6.45 ±4.17    

Frailty range; 0~20 score. CVA=Cerebrovascular accident.

Table 3.
Correlations among Variables
Variables 65~74 yr (n=9,032) 75~84 yr (n=11,530) Over 85 yr (n=2,306)
Frailty Depression Frailty Depression Frailty Depression
r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p)
Depression .26 (<.001) 1 .28 (<.001) 1 .26 (<.001) 1
Cognitive condition -.23 (<.001) -.14 (<.001) -.29 (<.001) -.16 (<.001) -.41 (<.001) -.25 (<.001)
Table 4.
Factors Affecting Frailty of Elders by Age Group
Variables 65~74 yr 75~84 yr Over 85 yr
b SE ß t p b SE ß t p b SE ß t p
Intercept
Smoking* -0.22 0.12 .02 -1.86 .062
Alcohol consumption* -0.32 0.07 .04 -4.24 <.001 -0.22 0.08 .02 -2.73 .006 -0.37 0.25 .03 2.20 .138
Physical activity* -0.69 0.13 .05 -5.24 <.001 -1.26 0.16 .07 -8.05 <.001 -1.94 0.59 .06 10.66 .011
Skipping breakfast* -0.53 0.31 .02 -1.74 .082
No. of disease 0.22 0.08 .03 2.83 .005
Hypertension*
Diabetes mellitus* 0.19 0.07 .03 2.62 .009 0.15 0.09 .02 1.71 .087
CVA* 1.35 0.12 .11 10.94 <.001 1.11 0.13 .08 8.65 <.001 1.09 0.42 .05 6.57 .010
Arthritis* 0.48 0.06 .08 7.73 <.001 0.59 0.07 .08 8.26 <.001 0.40 0.19 .04 4.57 .033
Urinary incontinence* 0.72 0.21 .03 3.45 .001 0.59 0.20 .03 2.99 .003
Depression 0.31 0.01 .22 21.91 <.001 0.36 0.01 .23 26.56 <.001 0.30 0.04 .16 68.53 <.001
Cognitive condition -0.12 0.01 .19 -18.93 <.001 -0.18 0.01 .24 -27.4 <.001 -0.31 0.02 .36 349.39 <.001
F (p) 135.66 (<.001) 245.40 (<.001) 96.48 (<.001)
R2 0.13 0.17 0.20

*Dummy variables (no=0, yes=1); Smoking, drinking alcohol, physical activity, skipping breakfast, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular accidents, arthritis, urinary incontinence; CVA=C erebrovascular accide ents.

  • 1. Statistics Korea. Percentage of elderly population [Internet]. Daejeon: Author; 2016.[cited 2016 February 16]. Available from:. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1YL0201&conn_path=I2
  • 2. Min J. Effect of social engagement on self-rated health trajectory among Korean older adults. Health and Social Welfare Review. 2013;33(4):105–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2013.33.4.105Article
  • 3. Kim JI. Levels of health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) and its related factors among vulnerable elders receiving home visiting health care services in some rural areas. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing. 2013;24(1):99–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2013.24.1.99Article
  • 4. Lee I, Park YI, Park E, Lee SH, Jeong IS. Validation of instruments to classify the frailty of the elderly in community. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing. 2011;22(3):302–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2011.22.3.302Article
  • 5. Whitson HE, Purser JL, Cohen HJ. Frailty thy name is . Phrailty? The Journals of Gerontology Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2007;62(7):728–730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/62.7.728PubMed
  • 6. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdie-ner J, et al. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2001;56(3):M146–M156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Morley JE, Haren MT, Rolland Y, Kim MJ. Frailty. The Medical clinics of North America. 2006;90(5):837–847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2006.05.019ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea Health Promotion Foundation. 2012 Yearbook of home visiting health care. Seoul: Author; 2013.
  • 9. Levers MJ, Estabrooks CA, Ross Kerr JC. Factors contributing to frailty: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006;56(3):282–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04021.xArticlePubMed
  • 10. Park JK, Kim SL. Factors affecting the elderly’ frailty among the vulnerable social group. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 2014;34(3):441–456.
  • 11. St. John PD, Tyas SL, Montgomery PR. Depressive symptoms and frailty. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2013;28(6):607–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gps.3866ArticlePubMed
  • 12. Yang F, Gu D, Mitnitski A. Frailty and life satisfaction in Shanghai older adults: The roles of age and social vulnerability. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2016;67:68–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2016.07.001ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Zheng Z, Guan S, Ding H, Wang Z, Zhang J, Zhao J, et al. Prevalence and incidence of frailty in community-dwelling older people: Beijing longitudinal study of aging II. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2016;64(6):1281–1286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14135PubMed
  • 14. Gu D, Dupre ME, Sautter J, Zhu H, Liu Y, Yi Z. Frailty and mortality among Chinese at advanced ages. The Journals of Gerontology Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2009;64(2):279–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbn009ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 15. Park BJ, Lee YJ. Integrative approach to elderly frailty. Korean Journal of Family Medicine. 2010;31(10):747–754. http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2010.31.10.747Article
  • 16. Sunwoo D, Oh YH, Lee SH, Oh JS, Lee SG. The future policy issues for health of the elderly: Construction of functional independence promotion system of everyday living activity. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2009.Report No.: Research 2009-22.
  • 17. Buchman AS, Boyle PA, Wilson RS, Tang Y, Bennett DA. Frailty is associated with incident Alzheimer’s disease and cognitive decline in the elderly. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2007;69(5):483–489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/psy.0b013e318068de1dArticlePubMed
  • 18. Burke KE, Schnittger R, O’Dea B, Buckley V, Wherton JP, Lawlor BA. Factors associated with perceived health in older adult Irish population. Aging & Mental Health. 2012;16(3):288–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2011.628976Article
  • 19. Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson JD, Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: Implications for improved targeting and care. The Journals of Gerontology Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2004;59(3):255–263.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. Yesavage JA, Sheikh JI. 9/Geriatric depression scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clinical Gerontologist. 1986;5(1-2):165–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J018v05n01_09Article
  • 21. Kee BS. A preliminary study for the standardization of geriatric depression scale short form-Korea version. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 1996;35(2):298–307.
  • 22. Imai Y, Hasegawa K. The revised Hasegawa’s dementia scale (HDS-R): Evaluation of its usefulness as a screening test for dementia. Journal of the Hong Kong College of Psychiatrists. 1994;4(2):20–24.
  • 23. Yang DW, Kim BS, Shim DS, Chung SW, Lee KS, Han SH, et al. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of revised form of hasegawa dementia scale (K-HDS). Journal of the Korean Neurological Association. 2004;22(4):315–321.
  • 24. Djernes JK. Prevalence and predictors of depression in populations of elderly: A review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2006;113(5):372–387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00770.xArticlePubMed
  • 25. Lee G, Ma RW. A study on the perceived health status among the elderly in local communities. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 2013;33(4):881–893.
  • 26. Birditt KS. Age differences in emotional reactions to daily negative social encounters. The Journals of Gerontology Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2014;69(4):557–566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt045ArticlePubMed
  • 27. Kim HR. Prevalence and risk factors of osteoarthritis among women and men elderly people in Korea. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 2013;33(4):805–820.
  • 28. Chimeddamba O, Peeters A, Walls HL, Joyce C. Noncommunicable disease prevention and control in Mongolia: A policy analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:660http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2040-7ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 29. Kramer AF, Erickson KI, Colcombe SJ. Exercise, cognition, and the aging brain. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2006;101(4):1237–1242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00500.2006ArticlePubMed
  • 30. Lee Y, Lee YS, Han A, Kim SY. Effects of silverobics exercise on metabolic syndrome risk factors, bone mineral density and living fitness of elderly women. The Korean Journal of Sports Science. 2012;21(1):1155–1164.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Frailty and its related Factors in Vulnerable Elderly Population by Age Groups
        J Korean Acad Nurs. 2016;46(6):848-857.   Published online December 15, 2016
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      We recommend
      Frailty and its related Factors in Vulnerable Elderly Population by Age Groups
      Frailty and its related Factors in Vulnerable Elderly Population by Age Groups

      Differences in Variables by Age Group (N=22,868)

      Characteristics Categories n 65~74 yr (n=9,032) 75~84 yr (n=11,530) Over 85 yr (n=2,306) χ2 p
      n (%) n (%) n (%)
      Gender Male 4,809 1,987 (22.0) 2,380 (20.6) 442 (19.2) 10.98 .004
        Female 18,059 7,045 (78.0) 9,150 (79.4) 1,864 (80.8)    
      Smoking  No 21,132 8,325 (92.8) 10,665 (93.2) 2,142 (93.7) 2.91 .233
      Yes 1,573 649 (7.2) 780 (6.8) 144 (6.3)    
      Alcohol consumption  No Yes 18,714 4,154 7,179 1,853 (79.5) (20.5) 9,536 1,994 (82.7) (17.3) 1,999 307 (86.7) (13.3) 75.98   <.001  
      Physical activity No Yes 21,889 979 8,545 487 (94.6) (5.4) 11,084 446 (96.1) (3.9) 2,260 46 (98.0) (2.0) 61.41   <.001  
      Skipping breakfast No 22,664 8,947 (99.1) 11,429 (99.1) 2,288 (99.2) 0.60 .740
      Yes 204 85 (0.9) 101 (0.9) 18 (0.8)    
      No. of diseases None 1~2 2,110 17,559 980 6,827 (10.9) (75.6) 937 8,871 (8.1) (76.9) 193 1,861 (8.4) (80.7) 73.09   <.001  
      ≥3 3,199 1,225 (13.6) 1,722 (14.9) 252 (10.9)    
      Hypertension No Yes 8,684 14,184 3,724 5,308 (41.2) (58.8) 4,129 7,401 (35.8) (64.2) 831 1,475 (36.0) (64.0) 67.26   <.001  
      Diabetes mellitus No 18,395 7,053 (78.1) 9,317 (80.8) 2,025 (87.8) 112.41 <.001
      Yes 4,473 1,979 (21.9) 2,213 (19.2) 281 (12.2)    
      CVA No Yes 21,457 1,411 8,460 572 (93.7) (6.3) 10,783 747 (93.5) (6.5) 2,214 92 (96.0) (4.0) 21.25   <.001  
      Arthritis  No Yes 7,810 15,058 3,477 5,555 (38.5) (61.5) 3,687 7,843 (32.0) (68.0) 646 1,660 (28.0) (72.0) 138.68   <.001  
      Urinary incontinence No 22,344 8,845 (97.9) 11,246 (97.5) 2,253 (97.7) 3.49 .175
      Yes 524 187 (2.1) 284 (2.5) 53 (2.3)    
      Depression No 13,339 5,651 (62.6) 6,469 (56.1) 1,219 (52.9) 141.89 <.001
      Mild 8,765 3,156 (34.9) 4,642 (40.3) 967 (41.9)
      Severe 764 225 (2.5) 419 (3.6) 120 (5.2)
      Cognitive condition Normal 18,534 7,866 (87.1) 9,159 (79.4) 1,509 (65.4) 600.00 <.001
      Dementia 4,334 1,166 (12.9) 2,371 (20.6) 797 (34.6)
      Frailty Not frail 18,765 8,104 (89.7) 9,222 (80.0) 1,439 (62.4) 999.50 <.001
      Frail 4,103 928 (10.3) 2,308 (20.0) 867 (37.6)
      Variables Range M±SD M±SD M±SD F p
      Frailty 0~20 2.21a±3.02 3.30b±3.55 5.08c±4.44 692.78 <.001
      Depression 0~15 4.24a±2.11 4.57b±2.27 4.84c±2.37 90.41 <.001
      Cognitive condition 0~30 22.55a±4.67 20.82b±4.81 18.78c±5.14 684.41 <.001

      a, b, c: post-hoc (Scheffé) comparison results for ANOVA. Different letters present that mean difference is significant with other groups.

      Frailty by Age Group

      Characteristics Categories 65~74 yr (n=9,032) 75~84 yr (n=11,530) Over 85 yr (n=2,306)
      M ±SD t p M ±SD t p M ±SD t p
      Smoking No 2.24 ±3.04 2.98 .003 3.29 ±3.55 -0.07 .945 5.09 ±4.43 -0.22 .829
      Yes 1.90 ±2.75 3.30 ±3.45 5.17 ±4.68
      Alcohol No 2.33 ±3.15 8.10 <.001 3.39 ±3.63 6.87 <.001 5.20 ±4.49 3.55 <.001
      consumption  Yes 1.78 ±2.42 2.85 ±3.09 4.32 ±3.99
      Physical activity No 2.26 ±3.03 6.39 <.001 3.36 ±3.55 9.68 <.001 5.13 ±4.45 5.86 <.001
      Yes 1.43 ±2.78 1.85 ±3.22 2.63 ±2.82
      Skipping breakfast No 2.22 ±3.02 2.07 .041 3.29 ±3.55 -1.54 .127 5.07 ±4.42 -1.07 .301
      Yes 1.67 ±2.42 3.94 ±4.22 6.67 ±6.34
      Hypertension No 2.17 ±3.02 -1.12 .261 3.19 ±3.55 -2.55 .011 5.19 ±4.67 0.85 .398
      Yes 2.24 ±3.02 3.36 ±3.55 5.02 ±4.31
      Diabetes mellitus No 2.17 ±2.97 -2.57 .010 3.26 ±3.52 -2.11 .035 5.12 ±4.45 1.06 .288
      Yes 2.37 ±3.18 3.45 ±3.70 4.82 ±4.39
      CVA No 2.11 ±2.92 -9.57 <.001 3.20 ±3.48 -8.98 <.001 5.05 ±4.42 -1.68 .097
      Yes 3.73 ±3.97 4.65 ±4.30 5.91 ±4.87
      Arthritis No 1.85 ±3.06 -8.90 <.001 2.73 ±3.53 -11.91 <.001 4.51 ±4.46 -3.88 <.001
      Yes 2.44 ±2.97 3.57 ±3.53 5.31 ±4.41
      Urinary No 2.19 ±3.00 -4.10 <.001 3.27 ±3.53 -4.57 <.001 5.05 ±4.44 -2.28 .023
      incontinence  Yes 3.30 ±3.69     4.40 ±4.13     6.45 ±4.17    

      Frailty range; 0~20 score. CVA=Cerebrovascular accident.

      Correlations among Variables

      Variables 65~74 yr (n=9,032) 75~84 yr (n=11,530) Over 85 yr (n=2,306)
      Frailty Depression Frailty Depression Frailty Depression
      r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p)
      Depression .26 (<.001) 1 .28 (<.001) 1 .26 (<.001) 1
      Cognitive condition -.23 (<.001) -.14 (<.001) -.29 (<.001) -.16 (<.001) -.41 (<.001) -.25 (<.001)

      Factors Affecting Frailty of Elders by Age Group

      Variables 65~74 yr 75~84 yr Over 85 yr
      b SE ß t p b SE ß t p b SE ß t p
      Intercept
      Smoking* -0.22 0.12 .02 -1.86 .062
      Alcohol consumption* -0.32 0.07 .04 -4.24 <.001 -0.22 0.08 .02 -2.73 .006 -0.37 0.25 .03 2.20 .138
      Physical activity* -0.69 0.13 .05 -5.24 <.001 -1.26 0.16 .07 -8.05 <.001 -1.94 0.59 .06 10.66 .011
      Skipping breakfast* -0.53 0.31 .02 -1.74 .082
      No. of disease 0.22 0.08 .03 2.83 .005
      Hypertension*
      Diabetes mellitus* 0.19 0.07 .03 2.62 .009 0.15 0.09 .02 1.71 .087
      CVA* 1.35 0.12 .11 10.94 <.001 1.11 0.13 .08 8.65 <.001 1.09 0.42 .05 6.57 .010
      Arthritis* 0.48 0.06 .08 7.73 <.001 0.59 0.07 .08 8.26 <.001 0.40 0.19 .04 4.57 .033
      Urinary incontinence* 0.72 0.21 .03 3.45 .001 0.59 0.20 .03 2.99 .003
      Depression 0.31 0.01 .22 21.91 <.001 0.36 0.01 .23 26.56 <.001 0.30 0.04 .16 68.53 <.001
      Cognitive condition -0.12 0.01 .19 -18.93 <.001 -0.18 0.01 .24 -27.4 <.001 -0.31 0.02 .36 349.39 <.001
      F (p) 135.66 (<.001) 245.40 (<.001) 96.48 (<.001)
      R2 0.13 0.17 0.20

      *Dummy variables (no=0, yes=1); Smoking, drinking alcohol, physical activity, skipping breakfast, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular accidents, arthritis, urinary incontinence; CVA=C erebrovascular accide ents.

      Table 1. Differences in Variables by Age Group (N=22,868)

      a, b, c: post-hoc (Scheffé) comparison results for ANOVA. Different letters present that mean difference is significant with other groups.

      Table 2. Frailty by Age Group

      Frailty range; 0~20 score. CVA=Cerebrovascular accident.

      Table 3. Correlations among Variables

      Table 4. Factors Affecting Frailty of Elders by Age Group

      *Dummy variables (no=0, yes=1); Smoking, drinking alcohol, physical activity, skipping breakfast, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular accidents, arthritis, urinary incontinence; CVA=C erebrovascular accide ents.


      J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
      Close layer
      TOP