Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 45(6); 2015 > Article
Original Article
Applying the Flipped Learning Model to an English-Medium Nursing Course
Heeseung Choi1, Jeongeun Kim1, Kyung-Sook Bang1, Yeon-Hwan Park1, Nam-Ju Lee1, Chanhee Kim2
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2015;45(6):939-948.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2015.45.6.939
Published online: December 15, 2015

1College of Nursing and the Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, Seoul

2College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

1College of Nursing and the Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, Seoul

2College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Address reprint requests to : Choi, Heeseung College of Nursing and the Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea Tel: +82-2-740-8850 Fax: +82-2-765-4103 E-mail: hchoi20@snu.ac.kr
• Received: January 7, 2015   • Revised: January 16, 2015   • Accepted: August 11, 2015

Copyright © 2015 Korean Society of Nursing Science

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs License. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0) If the original work is properly cited and retained without any modification or reproduction, it can be used and re-distributed in any format and medium.

  • 22 Views
  • 1 Download
  • 18 Scopus
prev
  • Purpose
    An emerging trend in Asian higher education is English-medium instruction (EMI), which uses English as the primary instructional language. EMI prepares domestic students for international leadership; however, students report difficulty in learning, and educators have raised questions concerning the effectiveness of EMI. The flipped learning model (FLM), in which lecture and homework activities for a course are reversed, was applied to an English-medium course offered by a college of nursing in Korea. The aims of this study were to: 1) revise an existing English-medium nursing course using the FLM; 2) explore students’ learning experiences and their acceptance of the FLM; and 3) identify key factors in the success of FLM.
  • Methods
    We used a descriptive, cross-sectional, mixed-methods design and the participants were students at one nursing school in Korea. A series of course development meetings with faculties from the nursing school and the center for teaching and learning were used to develop the course format and content. We conducted course evaluations using the Flipped Course Evaluation Questionnaire with open-ended questions and focus group interviews.
  • Results
    Students (N=75) in a 15-week nursing course responded to a survey after completing the course. Among them, seven students participated in one of two focus groups. Overall, students accepted and favored the flipped learning strategy, and indicated that the method enhanced lecture content and their understanding of it. Factors associated with effective instruction included structured monitoring systems and motivational environments.
  • Conclusion
    The FLM requires sufficient preparation to facilitate student motivation and maximize learning outcomes.
Figure 1.
Flipped course format for the course titled,“Human Beings and Health”.
jkan-45-939f1.jpg
Table 1.
Content Outline of the Course
Content Activities and assignments
Main Topics 2-minute self-video on the concepts of health, humans, and
  1. Meta-paradigms in nursing: Humans, health, environment, & nursing nursing: Peer feedback and class discussions
  2. Theories of human development: Physical, psychosocial, cognitive, and Group project: An analysis of a movie or drama using four
  moral development nursing meta-paradigms: Peer feedback
  3. Human developmental characteristics: Prenatal and infancy Health promotion project: Peer feedback on both progress and
  4. Human developmental characteristics: Childhood final outcomes of each other’s projects
  5. Human developmental characteristics: Adolescence Critical thinking activities: Euthanasia, sexual behaviors among
  6. Human developmental characteristics: Early and middle adulthood adolescents, depression and suicide among college students,
  7. Human developmental characteristics: Late adulthood and theories of aging health disparities
Special Topics
  1. How to utilize cTL and eTL services
  2. How to create self-videos
  3. How to use movie maker program
  4. Mass media influences on health and sexuality
  5. Hospice care and nursing
  6. Facts about suicide among college student
Table 2.
Learning Activities using Pre-recorded Lectures (N=75)
Learning activities Categories n (%)
1. Have you watched the pre-recorded lectures I watched every pre-recorded lecture 40 (53.3)
prior to the class? I missed the pre-recorded lectures 1~2 times 33 (44.0)
I missed the pre-recorded lectures 3~4 times 2 (2.7)
I missed the pre-recorded lectures more than 5 times 0 (0.0)
2. How did you watch the pre-recorded I watched the pre-recorded lectures from beginning to end 19 (25.3)
lectures? I watched all of the pre-recorded lectures and the parts that I did not understand again 49 (65.3)
I watched only the parts that I did not understand 5 (6.7)
No response 2 (2.7)
3. Have you reviewed pre-recorded lectures Yes 51 (68.0)
when preparing for the final exam? No 24 (32.0)
4. Do you think reviewing recorded lectures Yes, it was helpful because I could repeatedly review parts that I did not understand 38 (74.5)
helped you to prepare for the final exam?* Yes, it was helpful because I could review only parts I did not understand 10 (19.6)
No, it was not helpful for examinations 1 (2.0)
No response 2 (3.9)

*Only students who answered “yes” to question #3 responded to question #4 (n=51).

Table 3.
Evaluations of the Flipped Learning Method (N=75)
Compared to traditional learning methods, the flipped learning method Disagree
Neutral
Agree
No response
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
was strange and more uncomfortable 27 (36.0) 32 (42.7) 15 (20.0) 1 (1.3)
was more time-consuming 8 (10.7) 10 (13.3) 56 (74.7) 1 (1.3)
was more difficult to understand 42 (56.0) 19 (25.3) 11 (14.7) 3 (4.0)
was less interesting 33 (44.0) 22 (29.3) 19 (25.4) 1 (1.3)
was less efficient than a traditional class 39 (52.0) 18 (24.0) 18 (24.0) 0 (0.0)
made it harder to concentrate 23 (30.7) 14 (18.7) 38 (50.6) 0 (0.0)
was less effective in academic achievement 40 (53.3) 21 (28.0) 12 (16.0) 2 (2.7)
Table 4.
Major Themes and Subthemes Extracted from the Focus Group Interviews
Main themes Subthemes
Benefits of the flipped course Improved comprehension
  Able to preview and review material as needed
  Able to watch the lectures at one’s own pace
  Able to prepare questions for instructor
  Able to identify key concepts
Flexibility & Efficiency
  Able to choose best time and place for learning
  Able to concentrate on materials
  Able to review material regularly and avoid cramming for final exam
Enhanced learning experiences
  Able to pursue in-depth knowledge through critical questions and class discussions
  Experience sense of accomplishment as a result of self-directed learning
  Understand concepts of human beings and nursing from diverse perspectives
  Gain critical thinking skills
  Experience new ways of learning
  Gain ability to engage in diverse activities during class
  Being exposed to diverse lecture content
Limitations or challenges Demands, both time and effort
A lack of timely assessment and feedback on students’ questions
Not familiar with class discussions
Class size matters
Key success factors Structured monitoring systems
  Strategies to assess students’ performance
  Mandatory participation on online discussions
  Maintaining an open communication channel
Motivational environment: Well-thought-out plans
  For class activities: Effective utilization of class hours
  For class discussion: Topics appropriate to the learning level and class size
  Pre-recorded lecture: Proper length (25~30 minutes, no more than 40 minutes)
  • 1. Byun K, Chu H, Kim M, Park I, Kim S, Jung J. English-medium teaching in Korean higher education: Policy debates and reality. Higher Education. 2011;62(4):431–449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9397-4ArticlePDF
  • 2. Manh LD. English as a medium of instruction in Asian universities: The case of Vietnam. Language Education in Asia. 2012;3(2):263–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/12/V3/I2/A14/ManhArticle
  • 3. Kang HS. English-only instruction at Korean universities: Help or hindrance to higher learning? English Today. 2012;28(1):29–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266078411000654Article
  • 4. Kim KR. Korean professor and student perceptions of the efficacy of English-medium instruction. Linguistic Research. 2011;28(3):711–741.Article
  • 5. Joongangilbo. The Joongang daily university ranking [Internet]. Seoul: Author; 2013.[cited 2014 September 21]. Available from:. http://univ.joongang.co.kr/university/totalRankingReport.asp
  • 6. Joe YJ, Lee HK. Does English-medium instruction benefit students in EFL contexts? A case study of medical students in Korea. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. 2013;22(2):201–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0003-7ArticlePDF
  • 7. Chang YY. English-medium instruction for subject courses in tertiary education: Reactions from Taiwanese undergraduate students. Taiwan International ESP Journal. 2010;2(1):55–84.
  • 8. Kim M. Korean students’ responses to English-medium classes and their implications. Studies in English Education. 2009;14(1):30–50.
  • 9. Bergmann J, Sams A. Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day [Internet]. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education; 2012.[cited 2014 August 25]. Available from:. http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/112060.aspx
  • 10. Kim MK, Kim SM, Khera O, Getman J. The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education. 2014;22:37–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003Article
  • 11. McLaughlin JE, Griffin LM, Esserman DA, Davidson CA, Glatt DM, Roth MT, et al. Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2013;77(9):196http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/ajpe779196ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 12. McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, Gharkholonarehe N, Davidson CA, Griffin LM, et al. The flipped classroom: A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine. 2014;89(2):236–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000086ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Pierce R, Fox J. Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2012;76(10):196http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7610196ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 14. Missildine K, Fountain R, Summers L, Gosselin K. Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. The Journal of Nursing Education. 2013;52(10):597–599. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20130919-03ArticlePubMed
  • 15. Schwartz TA. Flipping the statistics classroom in nursing education. The Journal of Nursing Education. 2014;53(4):199–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140325-02ArticlePubMed
  • 16. Critz CM, Knight D. Using the flipped classroom in graduate nursing education. Nurse Educator. 2013;38(5):210–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182a0e56aArticlePubMed
  • 17. O'Flaherty J, Phillips C. The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education. 2015;25:85–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002Article
  • 18. Moraros J, Islam A, Yu S, Banow R, Schindelka B. Flipping for success: Evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. BMC Medical Education. 2015;15:27http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0317-2ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 19. Simpson V, Richards E. Flipping the classroom to teach population health: Increasing the relevance. Nurse Education in Practice. 2015;15(3):162–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.12.001ArticlePubMed
  • 20. Ferreri SP, O'Connor SK. Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2013;77(1):13http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/ajpe77113ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 21. Maher ML, Lipford H, Singh V. Flipped classroom strategies using online videos [Internet]. Charlotte, NC: University of North Carolina; 2014.[cited 2014 November 25]. Available from:. http://cei.uncc.edu/sites/default/files/CEI%20Tech%20Report%203.pdf
  • 22. Ginsberg MB, Wlodkowski RJ. Diversity and motivation: Culturally responsive teaching in college. 2nd ed.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2009.
  • 23. Tajvidi M, Ghiyasvandian S, Salsali M. Probing concept of critical thinking in nursing education in Iran: A concept analysis. Asian Nursing Research. 2014;8(2):158–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2014.02.005ArticlePubMed
  • 24. Hamdan N, McKnight P, McKnight K, Arfstrom KM. The flipped learning model: A white paper based on the literature review titled “a review of flipped learning” [Internet]. Lake Forest, IL: Flipped Learning Network; 2013.[cited 2014 December 2]. Available from:. http://www.flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/VA01923112/Centricity/Domain/41/WhitePaper_FlippedLearning.pdf
  • 25. Lage MJ, Platt GJ, Treglia M. Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education. 2000;31(1):30–43.Article
  • 26. Boucher B, Robertson E, Wainner R, Sanders B. “Flipping” Texas state university's physical therapist musculoskeletal curriculum: Implementation of a hybrid learning model. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2013;27(3):72–77.Article
  • 27. Gilboy MB, Heinerichs S, Pazzaglia G. Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2015;47(1):109–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008ArticlePubMed
  • 28. Moffett J. Twelve tips for “flipping” the classroom. Medical Teacher. 2015;37(4):331–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2014.943710ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Applying the Flipped Learning Model to an English-Medium Nursing Course
        J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015;45(6):939-948.   Published online December 15, 2015
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      • 0
      We recommend
      Applying the Flipped Learning Model to an English-Medium Nursing Course
      Image
      Figure 1. Flipped course format for the course titled,“Human Beings and Health”.
      Applying the Flipped Learning Model to an English-Medium Nursing Course
      Content Activities and assignments
      Main Topics 2-minute self-video on the concepts of health, humans, and
        1. Meta-paradigms in nursing: Humans, health, environment, & nursing nursing: Peer feedback and class discussions
        2. Theories of human development: Physical, psychosocial, cognitive, and Group project: An analysis of a movie or drama using four
        moral development nursing meta-paradigms: Peer feedback
        3. Human developmental characteristics: Prenatal and infancy Health promotion project: Peer feedback on both progress and
        4. Human developmental characteristics: Childhood final outcomes of each other’s projects
        5. Human developmental characteristics: Adolescence Critical thinking activities: Euthanasia, sexual behaviors among
        6. Human developmental characteristics: Early and middle adulthood adolescents, depression and suicide among college students,
        7. Human developmental characteristics: Late adulthood and theories of aging health disparities
      Special Topics
        1. How to utilize cTL and eTL services
        2. How to create self-videos
        3. How to use movie maker program
        4. Mass media influences on health and sexuality
        5. Hospice care and nursing
        6. Facts about suicide among college student
      Learning activities Categories n (%)
      1. Have you watched the pre-recorded lectures I watched every pre-recorded lecture 40 (53.3)
      prior to the class? I missed the pre-recorded lectures 1~2 times 33 (44.0)
      I missed the pre-recorded lectures 3~4 times 2 (2.7)
      I missed the pre-recorded lectures more than 5 times 0 (0.0)
      2. How did you watch the pre-recorded I watched the pre-recorded lectures from beginning to end 19 (25.3)
      lectures? I watched all of the pre-recorded lectures and the parts that I did not understand again 49 (65.3)
      I watched only the parts that I did not understand 5 (6.7)
      No response 2 (2.7)
      3. Have you reviewed pre-recorded lectures Yes 51 (68.0)
      when preparing for the final exam? No 24 (32.0)
      4. Do you think reviewing recorded lectures Yes, it was helpful because I could repeatedly review parts that I did not understand 38 (74.5)
      helped you to prepare for the final exam?* Yes, it was helpful because I could review only parts I did not understand 10 (19.6)
      No, it was not helpful for examinations 1 (2.0)
      No response 2 (3.9)
      Compared to traditional learning methods, the flipped learning method Disagree
      Neutral
      Agree
      No response
      n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
      was strange and more uncomfortable 27 (36.0) 32 (42.7) 15 (20.0) 1 (1.3)
      was more time-consuming 8 (10.7) 10 (13.3) 56 (74.7) 1 (1.3)
      was more difficult to understand 42 (56.0) 19 (25.3) 11 (14.7) 3 (4.0)
      was less interesting 33 (44.0) 22 (29.3) 19 (25.4) 1 (1.3)
      was less efficient than a traditional class 39 (52.0) 18 (24.0) 18 (24.0) 0 (0.0)
      made it harder to concentrate 23 (30.7) 14 (18.7) 38 (50.6) 0 (0.0)
      was less effective in academic achievement 40 (53.3) 21 (28.0) 12 (16.0) 2 (2.7)
      Main themes Subthemes
      Benefits of the flipped course Improved comprehension
        Able to preview and review material as needed
        Able to watch the lectures at one’s own pace
        Able to prepare questions for instructor
        Able to identify key concepts
      Flexibility & Efficiency
        Able to choose best time and place for learning
        Able to concentrate on materials
        Able to review material regularly and avoid cramming for final exam
      Enhanced learning experiences
        Able to pursue in-depth knowledge through critical questions and class discussions
        Experience sense of accomplishment as a result of self-directed learning
        Understand concepts of human beings and nursing from diverse perspectives
        Gain critical thinking skills
        Experience new ways of learning
        Gain ability to engage in diverse activities during class
        Being exposed to diverse lecture content
      Limitations or challenges Demands, both time and effort
      A lack of timely assessment and feedback on students’ questions
      Not familiar with class discussions
      Class size matters
      Key success factors Structured monitoring systems
        Strategies to assess students’ performance
        Mandatory participation on online discussions
        Maintaining an open communication channel
      Motivational environment: Well-thought-out plans
        For class activities: Effective utilization of class hours
        For class discussion: Topics appropriate to the learning level and class size
        Pre-recorded lecture: Proper length (25~30 minutes, no more than 40 minutes)
      Table 1. Content Outline of the Course

      Table 2. Learning Activities using Pre-recorded Lectures (N=75)

      Only students who answered “yes” to question #3 responded to question #4 (n=51).

      Table 3. Evaluations of the Flipped Learning Method (N=75)

      Table 4. Major Themes and Subthemes Extracted from the Focus Group Interviews


      J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
      Close layer
      TOP