1Department of Nursing, Inje University, Busan
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical School, Aju University, Suwon
3Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Inje University, Busan
4Department of Nursing, Graduate School, Inje University, Busan
5Department of Molecular Biology, Busan National University, Busan
6Department of English Language and Literature, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
1Department of Nursing, Inje University, Busan
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical School, Aju University, Suwon
3Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Inje University, Busan
4Department of Nursing, Graduate School, Inje University, Busan
5Department of Molecular Biology, Busan National University, Busan
6Department of English Language and Literature, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
Copyright © 2015 Korean Society of Nursing Science
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs License. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0) If the original work is properly cited and retained without any modification or reproduction, it can be used and re-distributed in any format and medium.
Safety innovation master plan from the ministry of public safety and security |
International safe communities designation indicator | |
---|---|---|
Strategies | Tasks | |
Strategy 1: | Strengthen the ability of the control tower for on-site support | Indicator 1: An infrastructure based on partnership and collaborations, governed by a cross-sectional group that is responsible for safety promotion in their community |
Strengthen the ability of the control tower | ||
Establish a disaster response standardized system applicable for all disasters | Indicator 2: Long-term, sustainable programs covering both genders, all ages, environments and situations | |
Build an improvement system for general management of safety policies of each sector | ||
Set a standard and direction for safety policies | ||
Strategy 2: | Strengthen ability and sense of responsibility for disaster response of the community | Indicator 1: An infrastructure based on partnership and collaborations, governed by a cross-sectional group that is responsible for safety promotion in their community |
Ability strengthening for on-site response | ||
Strengthen training and education of disaster prevention | ||
Strengthen rescue and response ability on land and sea | ||
Strategy 3: | Strengthen National Safety Education based on life-cycle | Indicator 2: Long-term, sustainable programs covering |
Expansion of safety | both genders, all ages, environments and situations | |
culture in daily life | Increase omnidirectional pan-national safety culture | Indicator 5: Programs that document the frequency and |
causes of injuries | ||
Create a public-private partnership governance with | Indicator 1: An infrastructure based on partnership and | |
community involvement | collaborations, governed by a cross-sectional group that | |
is responsible for safety promotion in their community | ||
Strengthen safety welfare policies | Indicator 3: Programs that target high-risk groups and | |
environments, and programs that promote safety for | ||
vulnerable groups | ||
Strategy 4: | Research and evaluation of disaster, strengthen reflux system | Indicator 6: Evaluation measures to assess their programs, |
Expansion of | processes and the effects of change | |
infrastructure for disaster safety prevention | Secure continuity of safety tasks through prevention Realization of scientific and effective disaster prevention | Indicator 4: Programs that are based on all available evidence |
Promote safety industry through new growth power | ||
Strategy 5: | Sectors including school, energy, traffic, disaster, industrial | Indicator 2: Long-term, sustainable programs covering |
Creative safety control | complex and harmful chemical substances | both genders, all ages, environments and situations |
by sectors |