Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 43(5); 2013 > Article
Original Article
Meta- analysis of Psychosocial Interventions to Reduce Pain in Patients with Cancer
Pok Ja Oh, Suk Jung Han
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2013;43(5):658-668.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.658
Published online: October 15, 2013

Department of Nursing, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Korea

Department of Nursing, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Korea

Address reprint requests to : Oh, Pok Ja Department of Nursing, Sahmyook University, Hwarangro-815, Nowon-gu, Seoul 139-742, Korea Tel: +82-2-3399-1589 Fax: +82-2-3399-1594 E-mail: ohpj@syu.ac.kr
• Received: April 2, 2013   • Revised: April 14, 2013   • Accepted: August 29, 2013

Copyright © 2013 Korean Society of Nursing Science

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 303 Views
  • 4 Download
  • 5 Crossref
  • 5 Scopus
prev next
  • Purpose
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of psychosocial interventions on pain in cancer patients.
  • Methods
    Eight studies published between 1980 and 2012 in Korean and ten studies published between 2002 and 2012 in English met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1539 participants. Methodological quality assessed by Cochrane's Risk of Bias for randomized studies and Risk of Bias Assessment tool for non randomized studies. The data were analyzed by the RevMan 5.2 program of Cochrane library.
  • Results
    Overall, study quality was moderate to high. Effect sizes were heterogeneous and subgroup analysis was done. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) were effective for pain (ES= -0.35; 95% CI= -0.56, -0.13). Pain education studies measured with NRS and VAS were effective for pain (ES= -0.77; 95% CI= -1.01, -0.52). Publication bias was not detected.
  • Conclusion
    This study support the use of psychosocial interventions administered to cancer patients for their pain management. However, more well-designed studies are needed.
Figure 1.
Flow of studies included from database search.
jkan-43-658f1.jpg
Figure 2.
Forest plot of effect size and 95% CI by cognitive behavioral therapy on pain & funnel plot of effective sizes by standard error for pain.
jkan-43-658f2.jpg
Figure 3.
Forest plot of effect size and 95% CI by education interventions on pain & funnel plot of effective sizes by standard error for pain.
jkan-43-658f3.jpg
Figure 4.
Forest plot of effect size and 95% CI by psychosocial intervention on pain & funnel plot of effective sizes by standard error for pain.
jkan-43-658f4.jpg
Table 1.
Characteristics of Included Studies (N=18)
References Sources Designs Subjects (stage/analgesic) Sample sizes Interventions Outcomes (Timing of measurement) Scale Direction of effect
Exp. (n) Cont. (n) Name/type Weeks/Number of Sessions/Min
Bordeleau (2003)* Journal (non-nursing) RCT Metastatic breast cancer (unclear/unclear) 80 36 Supportive-expressive therapy/ group 48/48/90 Pain severity (4,8,12 min) Symptom subscales of EORTC QLQ-C30 No diff.
Chujo et al. (2005) Journal (non-nursing) ) NRCCT Breast cancer patient (recurrence/unclear) ) 19 9 Psychosocial group intervention/ group 6/6/90 Pain severity (immediately, 3,6 min) EORTC QLQ-C30/ Br23 No diff.
Dolbeaul (2009)* § Journal (non-nursing) RCT) Cancer patient (ealry/unclear) 81 87 Psycho-educational group/group 8/8/120 Pain severity (immediately) EORTC QLQ-Br23
Goung (2003) # Master's (nursing) NRCCT Stomach cancer (terminal/narcotics) 32 32 Pain control education/ individual 1/1/30-40 Worst/Least/mean/ present pain (1 wk) BPI-K −/No diff./ -/No diff.
Hong (2010) # Master's (nursing) NRCCT Colon cancer patient (unclear/PCA) 21 21 Recovery nursing intervention/ individual 4/4/30-40 Pain severity (immediately) NRS
Jeong (2011) # Master's (psychology) NRCCT Cancer patient (unclear/no 8 8 MBSR/group 8/8/90 Pain severity (immediately) PPI/VAS −/-
analgesics)
Kim (2009) ** Master's (nursing) NRCCT Cancer patients (3,4/narcotics) 23 23 Pain management education/group unclear/9/30 Analgesic use/ pain severity(1 wk) BPI-K/NRS +/-
Kroenke et al. (2010)‡§ Journal (non-nursing) ) RCT ( Cancer patient (unclear/analgesics) ) 137 137 Telecare management 12/3/ unclear(phone) Pain severity (1,3,6,12 min) BPI
Kwon, Whang, & Kim (2002) ** Journal (nursing) NRCCT Home cancer patient (terminal/unclear) 16 16 Pain management education/ individual 1/1/30 Pain severity (2-3 wks) Patients Outcome Questionnaire
Lai et al. (2004)§ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient (2-4/unclear) 15 15 Brief pain education/group 1/5/10-15 Pain severity (immediately) BPI-T
Lee (2008) ** Master's (nursing) NRCCT Gastric Cancer Patient (unclear/PCA) 40 40 Structured PCA education/ individual 1/1/20 Analgesic use/ pain severity (1 wk) VAS
Lengacher et al. (2010) Journal (nursing) RCT Breast cancer patient (0-4/unclear) 40 42 MBSR/group 6/6/120 Pain severity (within 2 wks) MDASI
Shin & Lee (2003) # Journal (nursing) NRCCT Cancer patient (unclear/no drug) 25 25 Cancer pain management education/ Individual unclear/unclear/ 20-30 Pain severity (2 wks) VAS No diff.
Thomas et al. (2012)* †‡ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient (unclear/unclear) Coach: 64 Education: 75 : 88 Education or motivational-interviewing–based coaching/group 6/4/30(coaching, education-video) ,) Body pain (6 wks) BPI No diff.
van der Peet et al. (2009)§ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient(unclear/pain score of 4 or higher) 39 n 44 Intensive nursing-based pain education program/ individual / 3/3/60-90 Pain severity (4, 8 wks) Ferrell's pain questionnaire −/No diff.
Yates et al. (2004)†§ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient (unclear/unclear) 87 79 Pain management intervention/ Individual 1/2/30 Pain severity (1, 8 wks) BPI
Yildirim & Cicek (2009)§ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient (unclear/unclear) 20 20 Pain education program/ individual 3&7days/ unclear/ 30-40 Present pain/worst pain/least pain (2, 4, 8 wks) MPQ/NRS −/No diff./-
Yoo (2005)¶# Doctoral (nursing) NRCCT Lung cancer patient (unclear/unclear) 30 34 Web based education program/ individual 1/1/15 / Pain severity (3 wks) NRS

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; diff.=difference; RCT=Randomized controlled trials; NRCCT=Non-randomized controlled clinical trial; EORTC QLQ-C30=European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30; EORTC QLQ-BR23=European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast cancer module 23; VAS=Visual Analog Scale; NRS=Numeric Rating Scale; PPI=Present Pain Inventory; BPI-K=Korean Version of Brief Pain Inventory; PMI=Pain Management Index; BPI=Brief Pain Inventory; BPI-T=Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Taiwanese version; MDASI=M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory; MBSR=Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction; SF-36=Short Form-36; MPQ=McGill Pain Questionnaire; BQ-r=Barrier Questionnaire-Revised; BQ-K=Barriers Questionnaire Korean version; *Allocation concealment;

Blinding(performance);

Blinding(detection);

§Low risk of attrition;

Low risk of selection bias;

#High risk of performance bias; **Low risk of detection bias.

  • Cohen J. 1998.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. 2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Devine E C. 2003;Meta-analysis of the effect of psychoeducational interventions on pain in adults with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum. 30(1):75–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/03.onf.75-89ArticlePubMed
  • Egger M, Smith G D, Schneider M &, Minder C. 1997;Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 315(7109):629–634.ArticlePMC
  • Fawzy F I, Fawzy N W, Arndt L A &, Pasnau R O. 1995;Critical review of psychosocial interventions in cancer care. Archives of General Psychiatry. 52(2):100–113.ArticlePubMed
  • Galway K, Black A, Cantwell M, Cardwell C R, Mills M &, Donnelly M. 2012;Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life and emotional wellbeing for recently diagnosed cancer patients. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 11:CD007064http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1465 1858.CD007064.pub2ArticlePubMed
  • Golden R N. 2004;Making advances where it matters: Improving outcomes in mood and anxiety disorders. CNS Spectrums. 9(6 Suppl 4):14–22.ArticlePubMed
  • Gorin S S, Krebs P, Badr H, Janke E A, Jim H S, Spring B. . 2012;Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions to reduce pain in patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 30(5):539–547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.37.0437ArticlePubMedPMC
  • Higgins J P, Thompson S G, Deeks J J &, Altman D G. 2003;Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 327(7414):557–560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557ArticlePMC
  • Hodges L J, Walker J, Kleiboer A M, Ramirez A J, Richardson A, Ve-likova G. . 2011.What is a psychological intervention? A metareview and practical proposal. Psycho-Oncology. 20(5): p. 470–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.1780ArticlePubMed
  • Jang S Y &, Park J S. 2011;The meta-analysis of the effect of acupressure for nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Journal of Korean Oncology Nursing. 11(2):116–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.5388/jkon.2011.11.2.116ArticlePDF
  • Jassim G A, Whitford D L &, Grey I M. 2010;Psychological interventions for women with non-metastatic breast cancer (Protocol). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 10:CD008729http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008729
  • Kim J N &, I R. 2008;A review of research on the psychosocial interventions for the cancer patients. The Korean Journal of Psychology. 13(2):329–357.Article
  • Kim M Y &, Oh P J. 2011;Meta-analysis of the effectiveness on foot-re-flexo-massage for cancer patients. Journal of Korean Oncology Nursing. 11(2):127–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.5388/jkon.2011.11.2.127ArticlePDF
  • Kim S Y, Park J E, Seo H J, Seo H S, Song H J, Shin C M. . 2011.NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention. Seoul: National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency.
  • Kim Y H, Kwon I K, Kim J H, Seol M E, Jun M H, Ham Y H. . 2011.). Cancer symptom management. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa.
  • Korean Society Pharmacoepidemiology and Risk Management. 2011.Pharmacoepidemiology. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
  • Kwon I G. 2004, June 1.Psychosocial care for pain in cancer patients. Paper presented at the Korean oncology nursing society continuing education. Spring 2004.Seoul.
  • Min Y C &, Oh P J. 2011;A meta-analysis of intervention studies on cancer pain. Journal of Korean Oncology Nursing. 11(1):83–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.5388/jkon.2011.11.1.83ArticlePDF
  • Montgomery G H &, Bovbjerg D H. 2004;Presurgery distress and specific response expectancies predict postsurgery outcomes in surgery patients confronting breast cancer. Health Psychology. 23(4):381–387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.4.381ArticlePubMed
  • National Cancer Information Center. 2013;Survival rate: Five-year cancer relative survival rates. Retrieved January 30 2013, from. http://www.cancer.go.kr/mbs/cancer/subview.jsp?id=cancer_040302000000
  • Oh P J &, Choi H J. 2012;The effect of patient education interventions on distress, self-care knowledge and self-care behavior of oncology patients: A meta-analysis. Asian Oncology Nursing. 12(4):257–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.5388/aon.2012.12.4.257ArticlePDF
  • Oh P J &, Kim Y H. 2012;Meta-analysis of spiritual intervention studies on biological, psychological, and spiritual outcomes. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 42(6):833–842. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.6.833ArticlePubMed
  • Oh S S. 2009.Meta-analysis: Theory and practice. Seoul: Konkuk University Press.
  • Osborn R L, Demoncada A C &, Feuerstein M. 2006;Psychosocial interventions for depression, anxiety, and quality of life in cancer survivors: Meta-analyses. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine. 36(1):13–34.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • Raingruber B. 2011;The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions with cancer patients: An integrative review of the literature (2006-2011). ISRN Nursing, 2011. 638218:http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/638218ArticlePDF
  • Ranchor A V, Fleer J, Sanderman R, van der Ploeg K M, Coyne J C &, Schroevers M. 2012;Psychological interventions for cancer survivors and cancer patients in the palliative phase (Protocol). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1:CD009511http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009511
  • Rehse B &, Pukrop R. 2003;Effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life in adult cancer patients: Meta analysis of 37 published controlled outcome studies. Patient Education and Counseling. 50(2):179–186.ArticlePubMed
  • Schwarzer G. 2013;Meta: Meta-analysis with R. Version 3.0-1. Retrieved March 20 2013, from. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/meta/index.html
  • Sutton A J, Duval S J, Tweedie R L, Abrams K R &, Jones D R. 2000;Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 320(7249):1574–1577.ArticlePMC
  • Tatrow K &, Montgomery G H. 2006;Cognitive behavioral therapy techniques for distress and pain in breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 29(1):17–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-005-9036-1ArticlePubMedPDF

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Good Nursing Experience of Patients with Cancer in a Korean Cancer Hospital
      Eunyoung E. Suh, Hye Jin Yoo, Jeong Hee Hong, In Gak Kwon, Hyunju Song
      Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing.2020; 13(3): 51.     CrossRef
    • Managing Cancer Pain, Monitoring for Cancer Recurrence, and Mitigating Risk of Opioid Use Disorders: A Team-Based, Interdisciplinary Approach to Cancer Survivorship
      Eric R. Goodlev, Sandra Discala, Beth D. Darnall, Molly Hanson, Alison Petok, Michael Silverman
      Journal of Palliative Medicine.2019; 22(11): 1308.     CrossRef
    • Effects of Psychoeducational Intervention for Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
      Jin-Hee Park, Sun Hyoung Bae
      Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2017; 47(2): 143.     CrossRef
    • The Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on the Effectiveness of Non-pharmacological Cancer Pain Management
      Youngshin Song, Minhye Oh, Seyeon Park, Myouyun Park, Kyoungok Kim, Ukyoung Lee, Myonghwa Park
      Pain Management Nursing.2015; 16(5): 781.     CrossRef
    • Setting a Health Policy Research Agenda for Controlling Cancer Burden in Korea
      Sung-In Jang, Kyoung-Hee Cho, Sun Jung Kim, Kwang-Sig Lee, Eun-Cheol Park
      Cancer Research and Treatment.2014; 47(2): 149.     CrossRef

    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Meta- analysis of Psychosocial Interventions to Reduce Pain in Patients with Cancer
      J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013;43(5):658-668.   Published online October 15, 2013
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Figure
    • 0
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    We recommend
    Meta- analysis of Psychosocial Interventions to Reduce Pain in Patients with Cancer
    Image Image Image Image
    Figure 1. Flow of studies included from database search.
    Figure 2. Forest plot of effect size and 95% CI by cognitive behavioral therapy on pain & funnel plot of effective sizes by standard error for pain.
    Figure 3. Forest plot of effect size and 95% CI by education interventions on pain & funnel plot of effective sizes by standard error for pain.
    Figure 4. Forest plot of effect size and 95% CI by psychosocial intervention on pain & funnel plot of effective sizes by standard error for pain.
    Meta- analysis of Psychosocial Interventions to Reduce Pain in Patients with Cancer

    Characteristics of Included Studies (N=18)

    References Sources Designs Subjects (stage/analgesic) Sample sizes Interventions Outcomes (Timing of measurement) Scale Direction of effect
    Exp. (n) Cont. (n) Name/type Weeks/Number of Sessions/Min
    Bordeleau (2003)* Journal (non-nursing) RCT Metastatic breast cancer (unclear/unclear) 80 36 Supportive-expressive therapy/ group 48/48/90 Pain severity (4,8,12 min) Symptom subscales of EORTC QLQ-C30 No diff.
    Chujo et al. (2005) Journal (non-nursing) ) NRCCT Breast cancer patient (recurrence/unclear) ) 19 9 Psychosocial group intervention/ group 6/6/90 Pain severity (immediately, 3,6 min) EORTC QLQ-C30/ Br23 No diff.
    Dolbeaul (2009)* § Journal (non-nursing) RCT) Cancer patient (ealry/unclear) 81 87 Psycho-educational group/group 8/8/120 Pain severity (immediately) EORTC QLQ-Br23
    Goung (2003) # Master's (nursing) NRCCT Stomach cancer (terminal/narcotics) 32 32 Pain control education/ individual 1/1/30-40 Worst/Least/mean/ present pain (1 wk) BPI-K −/No diff./ -/No diff.
    Hong (2010) # Master's (nursing) NRCCT Colon cancer patient (unclear/PCA) 21 21 Recovery nursing intervention/ individual 4/4/30-40 Pain severity (immediately) NRS
    Jeong (2011) # Master's (psychology) NRCCT Cancer patient (unclear/no 8 8 MBSR/group 8/8/90 Pain severity (immediately) PPI/VAS −/-
    analgesics)
    Kim (2009) ** Master's (nursing) NRCCT Cancer patients (3,4/narcotics) 23 23 Pain management education/group unclear/9/30 Analgesic use/ pain severity(1 wk) BPI-K/NRS +/-
    Kroenke et al. (2010)‡§ Journal (non-nursing) ) RCT ( Cancer patient (unclear/analgesics) ) 137 137 Telecare management 12/3/ unclear(phone) Pain severity (1,3,6,12 min) BPI
    Kwon, Whang, & Kim (2002) ** Journal (nursing) NRCCT Home cancer patient (terminal/unclear) 16 16 Pain management education/ individual 1/1/30 Pain severity (2-3 wks) Patients Outcome Questionnaire
    Lai et al. (2004)§ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient (2-4/unclear) 15 15 Brief pain education/group 1/5/10-15 Pain severity (immediately) BPI-T
    Lee (2008) ** Master's (nursing) NRCCT Gastric Cancer Patient (unclear/PCA) 40 40 Structured PCA education/ individual 1/1/20 Analgesic use/ pain severity (1 wk) VAS
    Lengacher et al. (2010) Journal (nursing) RCT Breast cancer patient (0-4/unclear) 40 42 MBSR/group 6/6/120 Pain severity (within 2 wks) MDASI
    Shin & Lee (2003) # Journal (nursing) NRCCT Cancer patient (unclear/no drug) 25 25 Cancer pain management education/ Individual unclear/unclear/ 20-30 Pain severity (2 wks) VAS No diff.
    Thomas et al. (2012)* †‡ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient (unclear/unclear) Coach: 64 Education: 75 : 88 Education or motivational-interviewing–based coaching/group 6/4/30(coaching, education-video) ,) Body pain (6 wks) BPI No diff.
    van der Peet et al. (2009)§ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient(unclear/pain score of 4 or higher) 39 n 44 Intensive nursing-based pain education program/ individual / 3/3/60-90 Pain severity (4, 8 wks) Ferrell's pain questionnaire −/No diff.
    Yates et al. (2004)†§ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient (unclear/unclear) 87 79 Pain management intervention/ Individual 1/2/30 Pain severity (1, 8 wks) BPI
    Yildirim & Cicek (2009)§ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient (unclear/unclear) 20 20 Pain education program/ individual 3&7days/ unclear/ 30-40 Present pain/worst pain/least pain (2, 4, 8 wks) MPQ/NRS −/No diff./-
    Yoo (2005)¶# Doctoral (nursing) NRCCT Lung cancer patient (unclear/unclear) 30 34 Web based education program/ individual 1/1/15 / Pain severity (3 wks) NRS

    Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; diff.=difference; RCT=Randomized controlled trials; NRCCT=Non-randomized controlled clinical trial; EORTC QLQ-C30=European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30; EORTC QLQ-BR23=European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast cancer module 23; VAS=Visual Analog Scale; NRS=Numeric Rating Scale; PPI=Present Pain Inventory; BPI-K=Korean Version of Brief Pain Inventory; PMI=Pain Management Index; BPI=Brief Pain Inventory; BPI-T=Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Taiwanese version; MDASI=M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory; MBSR=Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction; SF-36=Short Form-36; MPQ=McGill Pain Questionnaire; BQ-r=Barrier Questionnaire-Revised; BQ-K=Barriers Questionnaire Korean version; *Allocation concealment;

    Blinding(performance);

    Blinding(detection);

    §Low risk of attrition;

    Low risk of selection bias;

    #High risk of performance bias; **Low risk of detection bias.

    Table 1. Characteristics of Included Studies (N=18)

    Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; diff.=difference; RCT=Randomized controlled trials; NRCCT=Non-randomized controlled clinical trial; EORTC QLQ-C30=European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30; EORTC QLQ-BR23=European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast cancer module 23; VAS=Visual Analog Scale; NRS=Numeric Rating Scale; PPI=Present Pain Inventory; BPI-K=Korean Version of Brief Pain Inventory; PMI=Pain Management Index; BPI=Brief Pain Inventory; BPI-T=Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Taiwanese version; MDASI=M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory; MBSR=Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction; SF-36=Short Form-36; MPQ=McGill Pain Questionnaire; BQ-r=Barrier Questionnaire-Revised; BQ-K=Barriers Questionnaire Korean version; *Allocation concealment;

    Blinding(performance);

    Blinding(detection);

    Low risk of attrition;

    Low risk of selection bias;

    High risk of performance bias; **Low risk of detection bias.


    J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
    Close layer
    TOP