Sook-Young Kim; Sun-Ei Joung; Chung-Il Hwang

doi:10.4040/jkan.2011.41.1.101

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 41(1); 2011 > Article

Original Article
A Comparison on General Education Curriculum of 4-year and 3-year Nursing Schools in Korea: Sook-Young Kim, Sun-Ei Joung, Chung-Il Hwang; Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2011;41(1):101-109.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.1.101
Published online: February 28, 2011

¹Associate Professor, Seoul Women's College of Nursing, Seoul, Korea.

²Post Doctor, Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Hwang, Chung-Il. Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University, 134 Sinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-749, Korea. Tel: +82-2-2228-2508, Fax: +82-2-364-5450, edusunny@paran.com

• Received: September 11, 2010 • Accepted: February 25, 2011

11 Views
0 Download
2 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
This study was done to comparatively analyze the general education curriculum of 4-yr and 3-yr nursing schools in Korea.
Methods
Ten university 4-yr nursing schools were selected based on universities in Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing 2010 or "2009 Korea's Best Universities-Top 10" published by Joong-Ang Daily. Ten college 3-yr nursing schools were selected based on colleges in Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing 2010.
Results
1) Generally 4-yr nursing schools maintained the relationships between organizational philosophy/purposes and subjects in the general education curriculum. But 3-yr nursing schools did not. 2) In 4-yr nursing schools there was a relatively higher credits ratio of general education curriculum and selective courses than in 3-yr nursing schools. 3) In 4-yr nursing schools variety of courses was relatively higher than 3-yr nursing schools. 4) In 4-yr nursing schools, operating conditions were relatively better (number of tenure professors, ratio of professors to students, Identification of exclusive organization in charge of the general education curriculum) for the general education curriculum than 3-yr nursing schools.
Conclusion
The results identify significant differences in the general education curriculum of 4-yr and 3-yr nursing schools in Korea, indicating that 3-yr nursing schools should make efforts to improve the good quality of general education curriculum.
Keywords: Curriculum; Nursing education; Nursing schools

REFERENCES

1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. 1998;Washington, DC, Author.
2. Bae EK, Yun SI, Chung CI. A comparative analysis of liberal education curricular among selected Korean universities. Korean Journal of Higher Education. 2003;14(1):1–26.
3. Bae JH. Portraits of 10,000 doctoral age. Money today newspaper. 2010;11 02 Retrieved November 5, 2010. from http://www.mt.co.kr/view/mtview.php?type=1&no=2010103111522687683&outlink=1.
4. Barrett W. Irrational man: A study in existential philosophy. 1990;New York, Anchor Books, Doubleday.
5. Chi SA, Choi MH, Choi KS, Kwon HJ, Park KS, Chung YK. Comparative study of Korean and foreign baccalaureate nursing curriculum. Chung-Ang Journal of Nursing. 2002;6:93–110.
6. Choi ML. A comparative study on the general education of Korean and American major universities. 2001;Seoul, Yangseowon Publishing Company.
7. Choi YJ. A comparative study on the college curriculum for general education across three countries, Korea, the United States and Japan. Research Center for Korean Youth Culture. 2005;16:144–175.
8. Chun SY. A comparative study of general education in small, private, rural and education-centered university in Korea·America·Japan. 2008;Seoul, Yonsei University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
9. Han SI, Kwon YS, Joo JH. Comparative analysis of general education of America's top 10 national universities 2002. Korean Journal of Comparative Education. 2003;13:91–119.
10. Hong HJ. Problems and improvement of curriculum in 4-year colleges. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2004;22:267–295.
11. Hong YS, Choe YH, Kim JJ. A study of nursing education program in University. Korean Nurse. 1993;32:72–110.PubMed
12. Jung SK. Why increase the entrance quota when there are no work place in the hospital for intern. Dailymedi newspaper. 2009;05 13 Retrieved October 15, 2010. from http://www.dailymedi.com/news/opdb/index.php?cmd=view&dbt=article&code=104712.
13. Katz S. The liberal arts in school and college. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2006;52(27):46–47.
14. Kim SG. A study on the curriculums of the nursing department in Korea and Canada. Journal of Korean Society for Hygenic Sciences. 2009;15(1):49–57.
15. Kim SW, Choi JD. The crisis of liberal education in a university and the future of the humanities. Epoch and Philosophy. 2009;20(1):11–42.
16. Kim SY, Son HM, Lee HJ, Lee HI, Jun EM, Cho KM, et al. A study for the nursing curriculum and educational environment in 3-year college. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 1997;3:125–149.
17. Korean Council for College Education. The plan to come to be advanced of education in college. 2009;Conference 2009, Summer; Seoul, Author.
18. Educational statistics. Korean Educational Development Institute Data. 2008;06 26 Retrieved July 26, 2010. from http://mailzine.kedi.re.kr/Material/MailZine/MaterialViw.php?Ac_Num0=6507&Ac_Code=D0010203.
19. Annually increasing graduate from non-nursing schools reenter nursing. Korean Nurses Association Data. 2009;04 14 Retrieved July 15, 2010. from http://www.koreanurse.or.kr/notice/notice021_01.asp?nSeq=248&strDiv=N.
20. Lee EH. Analysis on organization and implementation of general education curriculum in Korean university. Asian Journal of Education. 2007;8(2):91–118.
21. Lee HC. Preparation for the 21st century survival strategies of the university. 1996;Seoul, Hanyang University Press.
22. Lee KO, Han YL, Kim HJ. A comparative study on the 4-year college and 3-year college nursing curriculum. Journal of Korean Community Nursing. 1996;7:361–383.
23. Lee SB. A comparative study of general education curriculum between junior colleges of Korea and of America. Journal of Educational Research. 1993;12(1):1–32.
24. Lee SH. Curriculum theory in university. 1987;Seoul, Yonsei University Press.
25. Park CU. A study on the changes of general education curriculum by the operation of divisional system. Journal of Educational Research. 2002;22(2):77–97.
26. Park SJ, Je MS. A study on intensive major course of department of nursing in college. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2004;10:64–74.
27. Park SJ, Kim BU. Part-time lecturers who take 64% of general education in university are so unhappy. Kyosu newspaper. 2008;03 17 Retrieved July 17, 2010. from http://www.kyosu.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=15732.
28. Sin GR. Direction of nursing education in Korea to new millennium. Korean Nurse. 1999;38:53–72.
29. Song JH, Park SY, Choi YH. Analysis of curriculum between junior nursing college program and baccalaureate program for unification of nursing education. Korean Nurse. 1994;33:76–93.
30. Yang EB. Analysis of factors affecting undergraduate student's course selection. 1995;Seoul, Yonsei University. Unpublished master's thesis.

Table 1

The Relationships of Basic Directions of Curriculum and General Education Curriculum

^*Stated; ^†Not Stated; ^‡Agreement; ^§No Agreement.

Table 2

Credits Ratio of University and College Curriculum

^*Not Stated.

Table 3

Credits Ratio of Requisite and Elective in General Education Curriculum

^*Stated; ^†Not Stated.

Table 4

Credits for Courses in General Education Curriculum

^*Not Stated.

Table 5

Organization in Charge of the Curriculum

^*Stated; ^†Not Stated.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

A Comparison on General Education Curriculum of 4-year and 3-year Nursing Schools in Korea

J Korean Acad Nurs. 2011;41(1):101-109. Published online February 28, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.1.101

XML Download

We recommend

A Comparison on General Education Curriculum of 4-year and 3-year Nursing Schools in Korea

Table 1

The Relationships of Basic Directions of Curriculum and General Education Curriculum

^*Stated; ^†Not Stated; ^‡Agreement; ^§No Agreement.

Table 2

Credits Ratio of University and College Curriculum

^*Not Stated.

Table 3

Credits Ratio of Requisite and Elective in General Education Curriculum

^*Stated; ^†Not Stated.

Table 4

Credits for Courses in General Education Curriculum

^*Not Stated.

Table 5

Organization in Charge of the Curriculum

^*Stated; ^†Not Stated.

Table 1 The Relationships of Basic Directions of Curriculum and General Education Curriculum

^*Stated; ^†Not Stated; ^‡Agreement; ^§No Agreement.

Table 2 Credits Ratio of University and College Curriculum

^*Not Stated.

Table 3 Credits Ratio of Requisite and Elective in General Education Curriculum

^*Stated; ^†Not Stated.

Table 4 Credits for Courses in General Education Curriculum

^*Not Stated.

Table 5 Organization in Charge of the Curriculum

^*Stated; ^†Not Stated.