Eun Young Chang; Jeong Sun Kim; Su Jin Shin

doi:10.4040/jkan.2009.39.5.693

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 39(5); 2009 > Article

Original Article
Health Promotion Lifestyle According to Self-Perception of Obesity and Objective Status Measured by Bioelectric Impedance Analysis in College Women: Eun Young Chang, Jeong Sun Kim, Su Jin Shin; Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2009;39(5):693-699.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2009.39.5.693
Published online: October 31, 2009

¹Research Professor, College of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.

²Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, Chonam National University, Gwangju, Korea.

³Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Soon Chun Hyang University, Cheonan, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Shin, Su Jin. Department of Nursing, Soon Chun Hyang University, 366-1 Ssangyong-dong, Cheonan 330-090, Korea. Tel: 82-41-570-2491, Fax: 82-41-575-9347, ssj1119@sch.ac.kr

• Received: March 2, 2009 • Accepted: September 18, 2009

15 Views
0 Download
5 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to identify congruence between self-perception and objective status of obesity according to %Fat, and to investigate health promotion lifestyle in college women.
Methods
The participants were a convenience sample of 392 college women who were eligible and agreed to participate in this study. Respondents were asked questions using a health promotion lifestyle profile and were evaluated for their body composition using InBody 3.0. The data were analyzed with SPSS 14.0 program, which was used for Chi square, ANOVA, and post-hoc comparison with Scheffe.
Results
The major findings were as follows; 1) Overall, 41.8% of participants misclassified their perceived status of weight by %Fat standards and kappa was 0.329. 2) Two percent were underweight by BMI but overweight by %Fat and 39.0% normal weight by BMI but overweight by %Fat. 3) There were significant differences in health promotion lifestyle according to self-perception of body weight but there was no difference in health promotion lifestyle according to %Fat standards.
Conclusion
These findings suggest the necessity for development and application of tailored health promotion program based on self-perception of body weight and %Fat in order to reform incorrect body image and health behavior in college women.
Keywords: Health promotion; Body weight; Obesity

REFERENCES

1. Ajzen I, Madden TJ. Prediction of goal directed behavior, attitude, intentions and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1986;22:453–474.Article
2. American College of Sports Medicine. Korean College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's Resource Manual for Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 2008;7th ed. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Inc. (Original work published 2006).
3. Bas M, Kiziltan G. Relations among weight control behaviors and eating attitudes, social physique anxiety, and fruit and vegetable consumption in Turkish adolescents. Adolescence. 2007;42(165):167–178.PubMed
4. Cha ES, Park MY, Kim G. A comparison analysis of somatotype, physical activity, mental health, healthy behavior between normal weight and overweight college students in Korea. Korean Journal of Health Promotion and Diseases Prevention. 2008;8:245–255.
5. Cha KJ. Effect of an obesity management program on body weight, body mass index and physiological index of high schoolgirl students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2004;34:1362–1371.Article PubMed PDF
6. Chang VW, Christakis NA. Self-perception of weight appropriateness in the United States. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003;24:332–339.Article PubMed
7. Cheung PC, Ip PL, Lam S, Bibby H. A study on body weight perception and weight control behaviours among adolescents in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Medical Journal. 2007;13:16–21.PubMed
8. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;39:175–191.PubMed
9. Jang YA, Chung HR, Lee HJ. Change of perception after weight management education among some elementary, middle and high school students in Seoul. Journal of The Korean Dietetic Association. 2002;8:269–279.
10. Jung DJ. Influence of weight control behavior, body image, self-esteem, health promotion behavior and mental health promotion behavior in university female students by BMI. Exercise Science. 2006;15:365–376.
11. Kim EM. Diet and nutrition problem in women. Journal of Korean Society for the Study of Obesity. 2002;11:257–262.
12. Kim H, Park JS. The effect of an exercise program on body composition and physical fitness in obese female and college students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2006;36:5–14.PubMed
13. Kim HS. Correlations between waist-hip ratio, body fat, BMI (Body mass index), relative body weight and serum lipids by men and women. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 1999;29:596–604.Article PDF
14. Kim HS. A study on the university students' obesity status and acknowledgement. Korean Sports Research. 2003;14:1417–1434.
15. Kim KH, Kim OR, Chung KO, Jeong KS, Lee EJ. Weight control experience, body image and stress coping according to obesity in college female student. 2004;Gimcheon, Kimcheon Science College.
16. Kim MH, Kim TW, Hong YJ, Son BK, Pai SH, Chang KJ, et al. The prevalence of obesity and underweight in adolescents in Incheon area and the relationship between serum cholesterol level and obesity. Journal of the Korean Pediatric Association. 2002;45:174–182.
17. Kim O. BMI, Body attitude and dieting among college women. Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing. 2002;14:256–264.
18. Ko SK. The effect of BMI and %Fat as an obesity index on the diagnosis of hyperlipidemia in adult men. Exercise Science: Official Journal of the Korea Exercise Science Academy. 2005;14:21–30.
19. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health Behavior and Chronic Disease Statistics. 2006;Seoul, Author/Division of Chronic Disease Surveillance.
20. Korea National Statistics Office. Social Indicator in Korea. 2007;Daejeon, Author.
21. Korean Society for the Study of Obesity. Clinical Study of Obesity. 2001;2nd ed. Seoul, Korea Medical Book Publisher.
22. Lim IS. Sociocultural context of diet focused on college women's look-discriminatory experience and the body images of mass media. The Korean Journal of Sociology. 2004;38:165–187.
23. National Institute of Health. NIH Publication No. 02-5215. Detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. 2002;Bethesda, MD, Author.
24. Park IS. A study of the health promoting lifestyle. 1995;Busan, Pusan National University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
25. Park YW. 25% of elementary students are 'Normal body weight but high fat composition'. 2002;09 10 Retrieved February 20, 2009. from http://www.hani.co.kr/section-005100031/2002/09/00510003120020901854500.html.
26. Obesity and overweight. World Health Organization. 2009;09;Retrieved February 20, 2009. from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html.

Table 1

General Characteristics of Participants (N=392)

Table 2

Comparison of Self-perceived Status of Weight with Objective Status

kappa=0.329.

Table 3

Comparison of Body Mass Index with Body Fat

kappa=0.139.

Table 4

Health Promotion Lifestyle by Self-perceived Status of Weight and Objective Obesity

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Health Promotion Lifestyle According to Self-Perception of Obesity and Objective Status Measured by Bioelectric Impedance Analysis in College Women

J Korean Acad Nurs. 2009;39(5):693-699. Published online October 31, 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2009.39.5.693

XML Download

We recommend

Health Promotion Lifestyle According to Self-Perception of Obesity and Objective Status Measured by Bioelectric Impedance Analysis in College Women

Table 1

General Characteristics of Participants (N=392)

Table 2

Comparison of Self-perceived Status of Weight with Objective Status

kappa=0.329.

Table 3

Comparison of Body Mass Index with Body Fat

kappa=0.139.

Table 4

Health Promotion Lifestyle by Self-perceived Status of Weight and Objective Obesity

Table 1 General Characteristics of Participants (N=392)

Table 2 Comparison of Self-perceived Status of Weight with Objective Status

kappa=0.329.

Table 3 Comparison of Body Mass Index with Body Fat

kappa=0.139.

Table 4 Health Promotion Lifestyle by Self-perceived Status of Weight and Objective Obesity