Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 39(3); 2009 > Article
Original Article
Construction of the Structural Equation Model on Substance Use in Adolescents
Jeongyee Bae, Panuncio Rosel
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2009;39(3):446-457.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2009.39.3.446
Published online: June 29, 2009

1Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Inje University, Busan, Korea.

2Research Assistant, Department of Nursing, Inje University, Busan, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Bae, Jeongyee. Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Inje University, 633-165 Gaegeum-dong, Busanjin-gu, Busan 614-735, Korea. Tel: 82-51-890-6823, Fax: 82-51-896-9840, jibai@inje.ac.kr
• Received: December 19, 2008   • Accepted: June 4, 2009

Copyright © 2009 Korean Society of Nursing Science

  • 13 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 2 Scopus
prev
  • Purpose
    The aim of this study was to construct a structural equation model that would further explain the continuously increasing substance use disorder in Korean adolescents.
  • Methods
    Survey visits using a structured questionnaire were conducted with 3,885 students in 2 middle schools and 2 high schools in Busan. A total of 13 instruments were used in this model. The analysis of data was done with both SPSS 14.0 for descriptive statistics and AMOS 5.0 for covariance structure analysis.
  • Results
    Based on the constructed model, belief on substance use was found to have a significantly direct effect in influencing adolescent substance use. In addition, other factors such as family environment, satisfaction with school life, self-concept, social support, and personality vulnerability indirectly affected substance use. The final modified model yielded Chi-square=2,987 (p<.001), df=121, χ2/df=22.1, GFI=.96, AGFI=.93, NFI=.91, PNFI=.72, PGFI=.72, RMSEA=.07 and exhibited fit indices.
  • Conclusion
    This study constructed a model that addresses the factors related to adolescent substance use and explains the relationship of these factors in influencing substance use among Korean adolescents. Findings from this study can contribute to designing appropriate prevention strategies to reduce substance related disorders in adolescents.
  • 1. Aas H, Klepp KI, Laberg JC, Aaro LE. Predicting adolescents' intentions to drinking alcohol: Outcome expectancies and self-efficacy. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1995;56:293–299.PubMed
  • 2. Bae JY. Causal relationships between school adjustment of middle school students and related variables. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2008;38:454–464.PubMed
  • 3. Carmines E, McIver J. Analyzing models with unobserved models: Analysis of covariance structures. 1981;Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.
  • 4. Chang SO, Kim EJ, Seomin GA, Lee SJ, Park CS. Comparison of influential variables for smoking temptation between adolescent and adult smokers. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2006;36:561–570.PubMed
  • 5. Cho WJ, Kwon IS, Kim KS, Seo KM. Relationship between problematic drinking behavior and the personalities of high school students. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing. 2004;15:121–132.
  • 6. Chung YO, Lee CW. A study of factor structures of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale in Korean university students. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1997;16:117–129.
  • 7. Derogatis LR, Govi L. The SCL-90: An out-patient psychiatric rating scale preliminary report. Psychopharmacology Bulletin. 1973;9:13–27.
  • 8. Frances A. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. DSM-IV. 1994;4th ed. Washington DC, American Psychiatric Association.
  • 9. Harter S. The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development. 1982;53:87–97.Article
  • 10. Im SB, Lee JE, Yang SO. An analysis of nursing research on addiction in Korea. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2007;16:14–22.
  • 11. Jessor R, Jessor SL. Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. 1977;New York, NY, Academy Press.
  • 12. June KJ, Sohn SY, So AY, Yi GM, Park SH. A study of factors that influence internet addiction, smoking, and drinking in high school students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2007;37:872–882.
  • 13. Kang LJ, Kim HS. Risk and protective factors related to cigarette smoking among Korean male high school students. Consumption Culture Research. 2005;8:121–142.
  • 14. Kim GJ. The effect of academic achievements and perceived parental attitudes on self-concepts of elementary and secondary school students. 1984;Seoul, Chung Ang University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
  • 15. Kim HS. Structural model of delinquent behavior influencing by media violence. 1996;Seoul, Ewha Womans University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
  • 16. Kim HS. The influence of a family dynamic environment, personality, and smoking on delinquent behavior among Korean adolescents. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2001;31:641–655.
  • 17. Kim HS, Min BK, Kim HS. Correlation between delinquent and their character pattern and family dynamics. Ulsan University Medical Journal. 1992;1:188–205.
  • 18. Kim KI, Kim JH, Won HT. Korean manual of symptom checklist-90-revision. 1984;Seoul, Chungang Aptitude Publishing Company.
  • 19. Kim KS. Structural equation model: AMOS 7.0. 2007;Seoul, Hannarae.
  • 20. Kim MS, Kwon JH. A test of cognition-mediated model of adolescent smoking behavior. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2004;23:297–312.
  • 21. Kim YS, Kim JW, Kim SC. A national survey on adolescent alcohol use prevalence and related factors. Korean Journal of Social Welfare. 2001;47(11):71–106.
  • 22. Prevalence of drug abuse among adolescents. Korean Association Against Drug Abuse. 2006;Retrieved August 20, 2006. http://www.drugfree.or.kr/drug_bbs/board.php?board=seoul&config=&command=body&no=57&search=&shwhere=subject.
  • 23. Kwak KJ. Life satisfaction of adolescents in terms of KLSSA. The Korean Journal of Psychology. 1995;2:5–16.
  • 24. Lee KY. A study on the screening scale for potential drug use adolescents (SPDA) and survey of the drinking, smoking, and drug using. 2003;Busan, Korean Association Against Drug Abuse Busan Council.
  • 25. Lee SM. Covariance structure analysis. 1990;Seoul, Seongwonsa.
  • 26. Min BK, Choi SJ, Lee KH. Korean adolescents' behavioral pattern. 1978;Seoul, Youngsin Academy.
  • 27. Park NS, Oh KJ. Effects of methylphenidate treatment on cognitive behavioral symptoms and social, academic & emotional adjustment of ADHD children. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1992;11:235–248.
  • 28. Park YH. A study about self-esteem, anxiety and depression of smoking adolescent. 2001;Seoul, Chungnam National University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
  • 29. Phee SS, Oh SW, Park MC. Influences on perceived stress, dysfunctional attitude, self-efficacy, social support, and coping style on maladaptation in the adolescents with substance abuse. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 2000;39:297–308.
  • 30. Shin SR, Lee DS, Park JW. The effect of life smoking cessation program-multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2000;30:110–121.ArticlePDF
  • 31. Sin HS, Kim MK. Relationship of psychological types and behavioral characteristics in juvenile delinquents on probation. The Korean Journal of Psychology. 1998;10:227–250.
  • 32. Vaux A, Phillips J, Holly L, Thomson B, Williams D, Stewart D. The social support appraisal (SS-A) scale: Studies of reliability and validity. American Journal of Community Psychology. 1986;14:195–219.
  • 33. Velicer WF, DiClemente CC, Rossi JS, Prochaska JO. Relapse situations and self-efficacy: An integrative model. Addictive Behaviors. 1990;15:271–283.ArticlePubMed
  • 34. Wu NS, Lu Y, Sterling S, Weisner C. Family environment factors and substance use severity in an HMO adolescent treatment population. Clinical Pedriatrics. 2004;43:323–333.
Figure 1
Conceptual framework for substance use in adolescents.
jkan-39-446-g001.jpg
Figure 2
Testing for hypothetical model.
jkan-39-446-g002.jpg
Figure 3
Testing for modified model.
jkan-39-446-g003.jpg
Table 1
Correlation among Factors (N=3,885)
jkan-39-446-i001.jpg

x1=parenting; x2=family satisfaction; x3=school achievement; x4=school adjustment; x5=friend's support; x6=teacher's support; y1=depression; y2=anxiety; y3=impulsiveness; y4=antisocial personality; y5=self acceptance; y6=self esteem; y7=self confidence; y8=perception; y9=self efficacy; y10=substance use.

Table 2
Model Fitness Index for Hypothetical and Modified Model (N=3,885)
jkan-39-446-i002.jpg
Table 3
Direct Effect, Indirect Effect, and Total Effect in Modified Path Model
jkan-39-446-i003.jpg

CR=critical ratio; SMC=squared multiple correlations.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Construction of the Structural Equation Model on Substance Use in Adolescents
        J Korean Acad Nurs. 2009;39(3):446-457.   Published online June 29, 2009
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      • 0
      • 1
      • 2
      We recommend
      Construction of the Structural Equation Model on Substance Use in Adolescents
      Image Image Image
      Figure 1 Conceptual framework for substance use in adolescents.
      Figure 2 Testing for hypothetical model.
      Figure 3 Testing for modified model.
      Construction of the Structural Equation Model on Substance Use in Adolescents

      Correlation among Factors (N=3,885)

      x1=parenting; x2=family satisfaction; x3=school achievement; x4=school adjustment; x5=friend's support; x6=teacher's support; y1=depression; y2=anxiety; y3=impulsiveness; y4=antisocial personality; y5=self acceptance; y6=self esteem; y7=self confidence; y8=perception; y9=self efficacy; y10=substance use.

      Model Fitness Index for Hypothetical and Modified Model (N=3,885)

      Direct Effect, Indirect Effect, and Total Effect in Modified Path Model

      CR=critical ratio; SMC=squared multiple correlations.

      Table 1 Correlation among Factors (N=3,885)

      x1=parenting; x2=family satisfaction; x3=school achievement; x4=school adjustment; x5=friend's support; x6=teacher's support; y1=depression; y2=anxiety; y3=impulsiveness; y4=antisocial personality; y5=self acceptance; y6=self esteem; y7=self confidence; y8=perception; y9=self efficacy; y10=substance use.

      Table 2 Model Fitness Index for Hypothetical and Modified Model (N=3,885)

      Table 3 Direct Effect, Indirect Effect, and Total Effect in Modified Path Model

      CR=critical ratio; SMC=squared multiple correlations.


      J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
      Close layer
      TOP