Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 32(4); 2002 > Article
Original Article
Cost-Benefit Analysis on Community Health Practitioner
Tae Wha Lee, Il Sun Ko
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2002;32(4):435-446.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2002.32.4.435
Published online: March 29, 2017

College of Nursing, Nursing Policy Research Institute Yonsei University, Korea.

Copyright © 2002 Korean Society of Nursing Science

  • 14 Views
  • 0 Download
next
  • PURPOSE: The purpose of the study were to describe outcomes of CHP activities, and to evaluate the economic validity of CHP through a cost-benefit analysis. METHOD: The sample size was 272. Data were collected using a researcher developed questionnaire from November 1999 to March, 2000. RESULT: The mean age of CHPs was 39.6 (SD=.36). In regard to marital status, 90.8% of the respondents were married. 72% of the CHPs had associate degree. Among CHP activities, providing medical services was 50%, followed by home care visits 20% and health promotion services 20%, preventive services 10%. Total costs per month incurred to CHP activities was won3,053,437($2,442.7). Total benefits per month was won6,711,525($5,369.2). Hence, net benefit was calculated as won3,658,089($2,926). CONCLUSION: Cost-benefit ratio was 2.20, which provides the evidence of the economic viability of CHP program. The result of cost-benefit analysis, however, would more strongly support the economic value of CHP if intangible benefits of CHP activities such as decreases in pain and suffering and increased quality of life, could be counted.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Cost-Benefit Analysis on Community Health Practitioner
        Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2002;32(4):435-446.   Published online March 29, 2017
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      We recommend
      Cost-Benefit Analysis on Community Health Practitioner
      Cost-Benefit Analysis on Community Health Practitioner

      J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
      Close layer
      TOP