PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument to measure family resilience for Korean families with a chronically ill child, and to test the validity and reliability of the instrument. METHOD: The items of instruments used based on the researchers' previous study of concept analysis of Korean family resilience. Nineteen item scales were developed with five domains. In order to test reliability and validity of the scale, data were collected from 231 families, who had a child with a chronic illness. Data was collected between August and September of 2001 in a 3rd level University Hospital in Seoul, Korea. RESULT: The results were as follows: As a result of the item analysis, 19 items were selected from the total of 37 items, excluding items with low correlation with the total scale. Five factors were evolved by factor analysis, which explained 56.4% of the total variance. The first factor 'Family strength' explained 28.5%, 2nd factor 'Family maturity' 8.7%, 3rd factor 'The ability to use of external resources' 7.0%, 4th factor 'Control' 6.6%, 5th factor 'The driving force for finance' 5.7%. The attributes in these factors were different with those identified by concept analysis of the family resilience in Korean families from the previous study. Cronbach's alphacoefficient of this scale was .8039 and Guttman spilt- half coefficient was .8184. CONCLUSION: The study support the reliability and validity of the scale. Because the main concept of family resilience was family strength, there were distinct differences in dimensions of family functioning scales.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Family management structural model for children with atopic dermatitis
  Sunyeob Choi, Hyewon Shin
  Journal of Pediatric Nursing.2024; 77: e401.     CrossRef
• Association of nurse–mother partnerships with parenting stress and family resilience among South Korean mothers of children with congenital heart disease
  Youna Chang, Jiyoung Lim, Hye Won Yoon
  Journal of Pediatric Nursing.2024; 79: 16.     CrossRef
• Development and Validation of the Family Relationship Assessment Scale in Korean College Students’ Families
  Suk‐Sun Kim, Minji Gil, Yeounsoo Kim‐Godwin
  Family Process.2021; 60(2): 586.     CrossRef
• Development of a Self-Care Performance Scale for Patients with Stomach Cancer after Gastrectomy
  Min Kyung Jeon, Geum Ja Park
  Asian Oncology Nursing.2016; 16(2): 67.     CrossRef
• The Effect of Symptom Experience and Resilience on Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancers
  Kyung Sook Choi, Jung Ae Park, Joohyun Lee
  Asian Oncology Nursing.2012; 12(1): 61.     CrossRef
• Resilience of Families with Elderly Patients with Dementia
  Geun Myun Kim, Eunyoung Park, Young Shin Lee, Jong Nam Lee
  Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing.2012; 21(3): 197.     CrossRef
• Concept Analysis of Resilience in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases
  Su-Jin Shin, Duk-Yoo Jung, Eun-Hee Hwang
  Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2009; 39(6): 788.     CrossRef
• To Holroyd E (2005) Commentary on Lee et al. (2004)
  Insook Lee, Eun‐Ok Lee, Hesook Suzie Kim, Young Sook Park, Misoon Song, Youn Hwan Park
  Journal of Clinical Nursing.2006; 15(5): 654.     CrossRef

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop the instrument to measure family functioning for Korean family with a chronic ill child, and to test the validity and reliability of the instrument. METHOD: The items of instrument were consisted based on researchers' previous study of concept analysis of the Korean family functioning. Twenty six item scale was developed with six domains. In order to test reliability and validity of the scale, data were collected from the 231 families, who have a child with a chronic illness. Data was collected between August and September in 2001 in a General Hospital in Seoul, Korea. RESULT: The results were as follows:As a result of the item analysis, 24 items were selected from the total of 26 items, excluding items with low correlation with total scale. Six factors were evolved by factor analysis. Six factors explained 61.4% of the total variance. The first factor 'Affective bonding' explained 15.4%, 2nd factor 'External relationship' 11.8%, 3rd factor 'Family norm' 10.5%, 4th factor 'Role and responsibilities' 8.3%, 5th factor ' Communication' 7.9%, and the 6th factor 'Financial resource' explained 7.3%. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of this scale was .87 and Guttman spilt- half coefficient was .84. CONCLUSION: The study support the reliability and validity of the scale. There were distinct differences in dimensions of family functioning scales developed in the U. S.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Factors influencing self-management behaviors in older people with multiple chronic conditions based on the individual and family self-management theory: A cross-sectional study
  Youngji Seo, Sunyoung Jung
  Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing.2024; 26(3): 332.     CrossRef
• Do spouse burden of care, family resilience, and coping affect family function in gynecologic cancer in Korea?: a cross-sectional study
  Minkyung Kim, Sukhee Ahn
  Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2022; 28(3): 197.     CrossRef
• Family functioning according to clusters of family management styles in Korean families of children with chronic atopic disease: A cross-sectional study
  YeoJin Im, Sunyoung Jung
  International Journal of Nursing Studies.2020; 109: 103674.     CrossRef
• Factors Related to Dementia Worry: Comparing Middle-Aged and Older Adults in South Korea
  So Im Ryu, Yeon-Hwan Park
  Research in Gerontological Nursing.2019; 12(6): 299.     CrossRef
• Development and Validation of Korea Midlife Family Resilience Scale(KMFRS)
  Hea Rhan Park, Gwee-Yeon Jeon
  Korean Journal of Human Ecology.2014; 23(6): 1013.     CrossRef
• Infants' Temperament and Health Problems according to Maternal Postpartum Depression
  Kyung-Sook Bang
  Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2011; 41(4): 444.     CrossRef
• Factors Associated with Social Isolation in Older Adults using Senior Welfare Centers
  Yeon-Hwan Park, Hee Sun Kang
  Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2008; 38(5): 712.     CrossRef
• To Holroyd E (2005) Commentary on Lee et al. (2004)
  Insook Lee, Eun‐Ok Lee, Hesook Suzie Kim, Young Sook Park, Misoon Song, Youn Hwan Park
  Journal of Clinical Nursing.2006; 15(5): 654.     CrossRef

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Identification and Comparison of Interventions Performed by Korean School Nurses and U.S. School Nurses Using the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC)
  Eunjoo Lee, Hyejin Park, Mihwa Nam, James Whyte
  The Journal of School Nursing.2011; 27(2): 93.     CrossRef
• Analysis on Military Hospital Nursing Records by NANDA, NIC, NOC System
  Myung Ja Kim
  Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2010; 16(1): 73.     CrossRef
• Analysis of the Characteristics and the Nursing Interventions for Children in Regional Emergency Departments -Using the Nursing Intervention Classification-
  Young Hae Kim, Nae-Young Lee, Jae Hyun Ha
  Journal of Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing.2010; 16(4): 277.     CrossRef
• Healing Effects of the Forest Experience on Alcoholics
  Jingyung Cha, Sungjae Kim
  Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2009; 39(3): 338.     CrossRef