Major purposes of this study were to investigate the administration patterns of analgesics and sedatives in SICU
and to identify the factors influencing the use of prn analgesics and sedatives by ICU nurses. The sample of this
descriptive study was 50 adult patients in SICU and 53 ICU nurses. Patient's medical records were reviewed to
investigate names, doses, the routes of administration, the interval of administration, and the type of prescription of
sedatives and analgesics administered. Study medications were narcotics, hypnotics, and antipsychotics. To identify
the factors influencing the use of prn analgesics and sedatives, 53 ICU nurses checked 9 items, and rank them from
first to fifth. The selection of items was based on the previous studies and the experience of the investigator. The
results
of the study are as follows:
1. The mean age of the subjects was 53 years, 24 patients out of 50 subjects had received mechanical ventilation
therapy. Most of the patients received neurosurgeries and abdominal surgeries.
2. For 4 days, 13 total study medications and combination of these were administered to the patients. Commonly
prescribed drugs were Ketoprofen and Midazolam. Twenty six to fourty two percent of the patients did not
receive any drugs for at least one day during the four days.
3. On the average, the study drugs were administerd 1.4 to 2.6 times per day during 4 days.
4. More than 50 percent of the prescription was as-needed (prn) except those of the POD 3. Fourteen percent of the
patients did not have any prescription for sedation and pain control after surgery.
5. Examination of the frequency of sedatives and analgesics bolus administration revealed that a greater number of
doses were given during daytime (from 7 am. to 7 pm.) than nighttime (from 7 pm. to 7 am.). The difference
was significant at Alpha, .05.
6. First factor that most influenced nurses to administer sedatives and analgesics for intubated patients was the
evaluation of patient's vital signs (51%). For non- intubated patients, the factors that nurses considered
important were the patients' complaints of pain (64%) and evaluations of patients' vital signs (23%).
In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that patients in SICU might not receive enough analgesics and
sedatives to feel completely free from pain during the post operational period. Future study should be focused on the
evaluation of the adequacy of current practice for pain and anxiety control in terms of the SICU patient's response.
The purpose of this research was to identify nursing interventions performed by MICU and SICU nurses. For data collection this study used the taxonomy of the Nursing Interventions Classification(NIC: 433 nursing interventions) which was modified by McCloskey and Bulecheck(1996). Each of the 433 interventions were identified as used by MICU and SICU nurses. More than 50% of the ICU nurses performed 280 nursing interventions at least monthly. Rarely used interventions included 26 nursing interventions in the childbearing care class. Overall, both MICU and SICU nurses used interventions in the Physicological : Complex domain most often on a daily basis and the interventions in the Family domain least often. The most frequently reported interventions as being used daily in the MICU were chest physioterapy, airway suctioning and coughing enhancement and, in the SICU, documentation and airway suctioning. There were significant differences between MICU and SICU nurses differences interventions childbearing care, cognitive therapy, communication enhancement, coping assistance, elimination management, lifespan care, health system mediation, immobility management, medication management, neurologic management, patient education psychological comfort promotion, physical comfort program, respiratory management, risk management and information management. The SICU nurses performed there interventions more frequently than the MICU nurses. These findings will help in building of a standardized language for the MICU and SICU and enhance the quality of nursing care.
This study was done to evaluate the combination effects of capsicum plaster at the Korean hand acupuncture points K-D2 with prophylactic antiemetic on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV).
An experimental research design (a randomized, a double-blinded, and a placebo-control procedure) was used. The participants were female patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy; the control group (n=34) received intravenous prophylactic ramosetron 0.3mg, while the experimental group (n=34) had Korean Hand Therapy additionally. In the experimental group, capsicum plaster was applied at K-D2 of both 2nd and 4th fingers by means of Korean Hand Therapy for a period of 30 minutes before the induction of anesthesia and removed 8 hours after the laparoscopy.
The occurrence of nausea, nausea intensity and need for rescue with antiemetic in the experimental group was significantly less than in the control group 2 hours after surgery.
Results of the study show capsicum plaster at K-D2 is an effective method for reducing PONV in spite of the low occurrence of PONV because of the prophylactic antiemetic medication.