Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Decision-Making"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Reliability and Validity of Korean Version of Nursing Students’ Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision Making Scale
Mi Yu, Young Eun, KA White, KyungJa Kang
J Korean Acad Nurs 2019;49(4):411-422.   Published online January 15, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2019.49.4.411
AbstractAbstract PDF
Abstract Purpose

The purpose of this study was to adapt, modify, and validate the Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision-Making Scale (NASC-CDM©) for Korean nursing students.

Methods

Participants were 183 nursing students with clinical practice experience in two nursing colleges. The construct validity and reliability of the final Korean version of the NASC-CDM© were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and testing of internal consistency reliability. For adaptation and modification, the instrument was translated from English to Korean. Expert review and a cross-sectional survey were used to test the instrument's validity.

Results

The Korean version of the NASC-CDM© (KNASC-CDM) was composed of 23 items divided into four dimensions: (i) Listening fully and using resources to gather information; (ii) Using information to see the big picture; (iii) Knowing and acting; and (iv) Seeking information from clinical instructors. The instrument explained 60.1% of the total variance for self-confidence and 63.1% of the variance for anxiety; Cronbach's α was .93 for self-confidence and .95 for anxiety.

Conclusion

The KNASC-CDM can be used to identify anxiety and self-confidence in nursing students’ clinical decision-making in Korea. However, further research should be done to test this instrument, as it is classified differently from the original NASC-CDM© version.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The relationship between clinical decision-making levels and self-efficacy levels of operating room nurses
    Sedat Kaya, Gizem Kubat Bakir
    Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management.2024; 37: 100416.     CrossRef
  • Clinical decision making: validation of the nursing anxiety and self-confidence with clinical decision making scale (NASC-CDM ©) into Spanish and comparative cross-sectional study in nursing students
    Daniel Medel, Tania Cemeli, Krista White, Williams Contreras-Higuera, Maria Jimenez Herrera, Alba Torné-Ruiz, Aïda Bonet, Judith Roca
    BMC Nursing.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and Implementation of a Mobile-Integrated Simulation for COVID-19 Nursing Practice: A Randomized Controlled Pretest–Posttest Experimental Design
    Sun-Hwa Lee, Jeong-Sil Choi
    Healthcare.2024; 12(4): 419.     CrossRef
  • Development and evaluation of a collaborative reflection-based debriefing strategy for simulation-based education using virtual simulations in practical nursing: A randomized controlled trial
    Ji-Ah Yun, In-Soon Kang
    Nurse Education in Practice.2024; 81: 104170.     CrossRef
  • Constructing a Mixed Simulation With 360° Virtual Reality and a High-Fidelity Simulator
    Sun Kyung Kim, Youngho Lee, Younghye Go
    CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing.2023; 41(8): 569.     CrossRef
  • Path model on decision‐making ability of clinical nurses
    Minsook Park, Minkyung Gu, Sohyune Sok
    Journal of Clinical Nursing.2023; 32(7-8): 1343.     CrossRef
  • Achieving nursing students' clinical practice hours during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Effects of alternative and nonstandard practicum methods
    Min Kyung Song, Ji‐Soo Kim
    International Journal of Nursing Practice.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors Related to the Problem-solving Ability of Nursing Students Who Experienced Simulation Training
    Ji-Won Han
    Journal of Korea Society for Simulation in Nursing.2023; 11(2): 17.     CrossRef
  • A Concept Analysis of Nurses’ Clinical Decision Making: Implications for Korea
    Sunyoung Oh, Minkyung Gu, Sohyune Sok
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(6): 3596.     CrossRef
  • The Korean version of the Virtual Patient Learning System Evaluation Tool: Assessment of reliability and validity
    Hae Jeong An, Jung Suk Choi, Min Roh, Hyun Mi Cho, Eun Ju Choi
    Nurse Education Today.2021; 106: 105093.     CrossRef
  • 474 View
  • 17 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Factors on Decision-Making Participation related to Clinical Experience Difference
Nan Young Lim, Yeo Jin Yi
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2004;34(2):270-277.   Published online March 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2004.34.2.270
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between decision-making factors(theoretical knowledge, expertise, empowerment, intuition) and participation in proportion to nurses's clinical experience.

Method

Data was collected by quota sampling from July 10, 2001 to August 22, 2001 from 132 clinical nurses who work for 3 General hospitals. Data was analyzed using SPSSWIN 10.0 with crosstab, ANOVA, and stepwise multiple regression.

Result

Expertise(F=34.347, p=.000), empowerment(F=29.316, p=.000), and participation(F=3.276, p=.041) were significantly different among 3 clinical experience groups. Clinical experience correlated with expertise(r=.551, p=.000) and empowerment(r=.492, p=.000), and Decision-making participation also correlated with expertise(r=.351, p=.000) and empowerment(r=.265, p=.002). Decision-making participation is effected by theoretical knowledge(under 3.00yr clinical experience), expertise(3.01-5.00yr), and empowerment(above 5.01yr).

Conclusion

These findings indicate that factors(theoretical knowledge, expertise, or empowerment) on decision-making participation varies as nurses's clinical experience differs. Therefore, decision-making needs bilateral agreement between staff nurses and nurse managers rather than the responsibility of one.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Structural Equation Modeling on Clinical Decision Making Ability of Nurses
    Min Kyoung Park, Soukyoung Kim
    Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2019; 49(5): 601.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Internal Marketing Perception, Empowerment, and Job satisfaction on Customer Orientation of Clinical Nurses
    Eun-Ah Yi, Yeo-Jin Yi
    Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing.2012; 21(3): 299.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Job Stress and Empowerment on Clinical Nurses' Performance in Small and Medium Hospitals
    Young-Mi Kim, Yeo-Jin Yi
    Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing.2012; 21(3): 258.     CrossRef
  • Influencing Factors on Service Quality of Care Helpers Working for the Elderly in Long Term Care
    Yeo-Jin Yi, Kwang-Hi Park
    Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing.2012; 21(2): 145.     CrossRef
  • The Effects of Case-Based Learning Using Video on Clinical Decision Making and Learning Motivation in Undergraduate Nursing Students
    Moon-Sook Yoo, Jin-Hee Park, Si-Ra Lee
    Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2010; 40(6): 863.     CrossRef
  • 102 View
  • 2 Download
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Development and Evaluation of Shared Medical Decision-Making Scale for End-of-Life Patients in Korea
Kae Hwa Jo
J Korean Acad Nurs 2012;42(4):453-465.   Published online August 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.4.453
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The study was done to develop a shared decision-making scale for end-of-life patients in Korea.

Methods

The process included construction of a conceptual framework, generation of initial items, verification of content validity, selection of secondary items, preliminary study, and extraction of final items. The participants were 388 adults who lived in one of 3 Korean metropolitan cities: Seoul, Daegu, or Busan. Item analysis, factor analysis, criterion related validity, and internal consistency were used to analyze the data. Data collection was done from July to October 2011.

Results

Thirty-four items were selected for the final scale, and categorized into 7 factors explaining 61.9% of the total variance. The factors were labeled as sharing information (9 items), constructing system (7 items), explanation as a duty (5 items), autonomy (4 items), capturing time (3 items), participation of family (3 items), and human respect (3 items). The scores for the scale were significantly correlated among shared decision-making scale, terminating life support scale, and dignified dying scale. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the 34 items was .94.

Conclusion

The above findings indicate that the shared decision-making scale has a good validity and reliability when used for end-of-life patients in Korea.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The effect of illness uncertainty and self‐efficacy on the perception of shared decision‐making among parents of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit
    Dahae Choi, Hyewon Shin
    Nursing in Critical Care.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influences of Nursing Professionalism, Empathy, and Clinical Decision-Making Ability on Shared Decision-Making Awareness among Hemodialysis Nurses
    Junghwa Yun, Mihyeon Seong, Youngmi Cho, Sohyune Sok, Majed Alamri
    Journal of Nursing Management.2024; 2024: 1.     CrossRef
  • An exploratory study on the shared decision-making as a two-way symmetrical communication process : focusing on the communication of kidney dialysis patients
    Soojin Kim, Soontae An, Sejoong Kim, Dong-Ryeol Ryu, Hwanhee Kim
    Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies.2021; 65(2): 162.     CrossRef
  • Awareness of Doctors’ Shared Decision-Making in Life-Sustaining Care Decisions
    Dalyong Kim, Hyun Jung Lee, Soo-Young Yu, Jung Hye Kwon, Hee Kyung Ahn, Jee Hyun Kim, Seyoung Seo, Chi Hoon Maeng, Seungtaek Lim, Do Yeun Kim, Sung Joon Shin
    The Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care.2021; 24(4): 204.     CrossRef
  • The Perceptions and Needs of Hospice Palliative Care and Shared Decision Making among Middle-Aged Adults
    Na-Yeon Lee, Seungjin Lee, Soo-Kyoung Lee
    The Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care.2016; 19(4): 310.     CrossRef
  • Health Care Professional Factors Influencing Shared Medical Decision Making in Korea
    Kae-Hwa Jo, Gyeong-Ju An, Hong Seon Lee
    Sage Open.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of an educational programme on shared decision‐making among Korean nurses
    Kae‐Hwa Jo, Gyeong‐Ju An
    International Journal of Nursing Practice.2015; 21(6): 839.     CrossRef
  • Types of Shared Medical Decision Making for Terminally Ill Patients
    Kae Hwa Jo, Gyun Moo Kim
    The Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care.2014; 17(4): 278.     CrossRef
  • Factors Affecting Shared Decision Making at End of Life in Korean Adults
    Jo Kae-Hwa, An Gyeong-Ju
    Holistic Nursing Practice.2013; 27(6): 329.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Nurses’ Attitude toward Dignified Death and Moral Sensitivity on Their End-of-Life Care Performance
    Kae Hwa Jo, Yeon Ja Kim
    The Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care.2013; 16(4): 223.     CrossRef
  • Preferences for Care near the End of Life according to Chronic Patients' Characteristics
    Seonyoung Yun, Jiyeon Kang
    Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2013; 25(2): 207.     CrossRef
  • 272 View
  • 3 Download
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer

J Korean Acad Nurs : Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
Close layer
TOP