Yoon Jung Ji; Jae Sim Jeong

doi:10.4040/jkan.2013.43.3.305

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Korean Acad Nurs > Volume 43(3); 2013 > Article

Original Article
Comparison of Antimicrobial Effect of Alcohol Gel according to the Amount and Drying Time in Health Personnel Hand Hygiene: Yoon Jung Ji, Jae Sim Jeong; Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2013;43(3):305-311.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.3.305
Published online: June 28, 2013

¹The Graduate School of Industrial Technology University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea.

²University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Jeong, Jae Sim. University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Olympicro 43 gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea. Tel: +82-92-3010-5311, Fax: +82-02-3010-5332, jsjeong@amc.seoul.kr

• Received: October 18, 2012 • Accepted: February 13, 2013

220 Views
0 Download
5 Crossref
2 Scopus

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of alcohol gel according to the amount and drying time in health personnel hand hygiene and to promote in their practice adequate and effective hand hygiene.
Methods
The cross-over experimental study was performed with 14 volunteers. Hands were artificially contaminated with 5 mL of 10⁸ CFU/mL of Serratia marcescens (ATCC 14756) and four different alcohol gel hand hygiene methods varying by the amount of alcohol gel (2 mL vs. 1 mL) and drying time (complete vs. incomplete) were compared. Samples were collected by glove juice sampling procedures.
Results
Mean log reduction values of the four different hand hygiene methods were 2.22±0.36, 1.26±0.53, 1.49±0.60, 0.89±0.47 respectively for the 4 groups: adequate amount (2mL) and complete dry (30 seconds rubbing followed by 2 min air-dry), inadequate amount (1 mL) and complete dry, adequate amount and incomplete dry (15 seconds rubbing and no air-dry), and inadequate amount and incomplete dry. The difference was statistically significant in the adequate amount and complete dry group compared to other three groups (p<.001).
Conclusion
Only alcohol gel hand hygiene with adequate amount and complete drying was satisfactory by U.S. FDA-TFM efficacy requirements for antiseptic hand hygiene products.
Keywords: Hand hygiene; Alcohol gel; Cross-over studies; Health personnel

This manuscript is a condensed form of the first author's master's thesis from University of Ulsan.

REFERENCES

1. Ahn MJ. Handwashing related factors of handwashing practice by nursing personal in crictical care unit. Seoul, Yonsei University. 2002;Unpublished master's thesis.
2. Boyce JM, Pittet D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: Recommendations of the healthcare infection control practices advisory committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA hand hygiene task force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23:12 Suppl. S3–S40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/503164Article PubMed
3. Dharan S, Hugonnet S, Sax H, Pittet D. Comparison of waterless hand antisepsis agents at short application times: Raising the flag of concern. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003;24(3):160–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/502182Article PubMed
4. Garner JS. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996;17(1):53–80.Article PubMed
5. Guilhermetti M, Marques Wiirzler LA, Castanheira Facio B, da Silva Furlan M, Campo Meschial W, Bronharo Tognim MC, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of alcohol-based hand gels. J Hosp Infect. 2010;74(3):219–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.09.019Article PubMed
6. Han MJ. The effect of an educational handwashing program on the handwashing compliance. Cheonan, Dankook University. 2003;Unpublished master's thesis.
7. Jeong JS, Choe MA. The effect of hand washing improving programs on the adherence of hand washing and nosocomial infections in a surgical intensive care unit. Korean J Nosocomial Infect Control. 2004;9(2):117–129.
8. Jeong JS, Kim DH, Kim MN, Choe MA. Bactericidal effect of waterless alcohol gel hand washing agent. J Korean Biol Nurs Sci. 2002;4(2):127–137.
9. Ju HL, Sim JS, Kim MN, Park KO. A comparison of antimicrobialeffect of two waterless alcohol-based hand rubs with a povidone-iodine hand scrub for surgical hand antisepsis. J Korean Clin Nurs Res. 2009;15(1):55–65.
10. Kampf G. How effective are hand antiseptics for the postcontamination treatment of hands when used as recommended? Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(5):356–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2007.07.017Article PubMed
11. Kampf G, Ostermeyer C. Efficacy of alcohol-based gels compared with simple hand wash and hygienic hand disinfection. J Hosp Infect. 2004;56:Suppl 2. S13–S15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2003.12.026Article PubMed
12. Kang MW. National survey and development of standardized practice on the infection control in Korea. Gwacheon: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2004.
13. Kramer A, Rudolph P, Kampf G, Pittet D. Limited efficacy of alcohol-based hand gels. Lancet. 2002;359(9316):1489–1490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08426-xArticle PubMed
14. Larson EL, Eke PI, Wilder MP, Laughon BE. Quantity of soap as a variable in handwashing. Infect Control. 1987;8(9):371–375.Article PubMed
15. Larson EL, Strom MS, Evans CA. Analysis of three variables in sampling solutions used to assay bacteria of hands: Type of solution, use of antiseptic neutralizers, and solution temperature. J Clin Microbiol. 1980;12(3):355–360.Article PubMed PMC PDF
16. Laustsen S, Lund E, Bibby BM, Kristensen B, Thulstrup AM, Kjølseth Møller J. Effect of correctly using alcohol-based hand rub in a clinical setting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(10):954–956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/590393Article PubMed
17. Lim OB. Effect of education and feedback on the frequency and quality of hand hygiene. Ulsan, University of Ulsan. 2004;Unpublished master's thesis.
18. Park ES, Jeong JS, Kim KM, Kim OS, Jeong SY, Jang SY, et al. Descriptive study on the current Usage of disinfectants in Korea. Korean J Nosocomial Infect Control. 2006;11(1):42–49.
19. Pittet D. Improving adherence to hand hygiene practice: A multidisciplinary approach. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(2):234–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0702.700234Article PubMed PMC
20. Pittet D, Hugonnet S, Harbarth S, Mourouga P, Sauvan V, Touveneau S, et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Infection Control Programme. Lancet. 2000;356(9238):1307–1312.PubMed
21. Tvedt C, Bukholm G. Alcohol-based hand disinfection: A more robust hand-hygiene method in an intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2005;59(3):229–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2004.10.003Article PubMed
22. Widmer AE, Dangel M. Alcohol-based handrub: Evaluation of technique and microbiological efficacy with international infection control professionals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25(3):207–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/502379Article PubMed
23. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009.

Figure 1

Research design.

Figure 2

Box and whisker plots of antimicrobial effect of four types 62% alcohols gel hand hygiene methods.

Table 1

Baseline and Residual Bacterial Density among Four Types of 62% Alcohol Gel Hand Hygiene Method

^*By one-way ANOVA test; ^†Difference was statistically significant between a and b, c, d by Scheffe post-hoc analysis.

Table 2

Comparison of Antimicrobial Effect of Four Types of 62% Alcohol Gel Hand Hygiene Method

^*By one-way ANOVA test with Scheffe post-hoc analysis; Difference was significant between a and b, c, d (p<.001) and between b and d (p=.026).

Table 3

Antimicrobial Effect of 62% Alcohol Gels with Different Amount, Rubbing Time, and Drying Time

^*By student t-test.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Comparison of in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo Antibacterial Activity Test Methods for Hand Hygiene Products
Daeun Lee, Hyeonju Yeo, Haeyoon Jeong
Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety.2024; 39(1): 35. CrossRef
Comparison of the Degree of Bacterial Removal by Hand Hygiene Products
Young Sun Hwang
Journal of Dental Hygiene Science.2022; 22(1): 51. CrossRef
Effect of Skin Disinfection according to the Disinfection Frequency in Peripheral Intravenous Therapy
Jinhee Park, Soo Jung Chang
Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2020; 27(4): 366. CrossRef
The Meanings of Hands among Clinical Nurses in a Tertiary Hospital
Hye Jin Yoo, Eunyoung E. Suh, Yeon Hee Shin, Jung Sun Choi, Kwang Hee Park, Jung Yoon Kim, Hyunsun Kim, Jiyoung Kang
Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing.2019; 12(3): 50. CrossRef
An Integrative Model of Workplace Self-protective Behavior for Korean Nurses
Seol Ah Kim, Hyun Soo Oh, Yeon Ok Suh, Wha Sook Seo
Asian Nursing Research.2014; 8(2): 91. CrossRef

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Comparison of Antimicrobial Effect of Alcohol Gel according to the Amount and Drying Time in Health Personnel Hand Hygiene

J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013;43(3):305-311. Published online June 28, 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.3.305

XML Download

Figure

We recommend

Comparison of Antimicrobial Effect of Alcohol Gel according to the Amount and Drying Time in Health Personnel Hand Hygiene

Figure 1 Research design.

Figure 2 Box and whisker plots of antimicrobial effect of four types 62% alcohols gel hand hygiene methods.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Comparison of Antimicrobial Effect of Alcohol Gel according to the Amount and Drying Time in Health Personnel Hand Hygiene

Table 1

Baseline and Residual Bacterial Density among Four Types of 62% Alcohol Gel Hand Hygiene Method

^*By one-way ANOVA test; ^†Difference was statistically significant between a and b, c, d by Scheffe post-hoc analysis.

Table 2

Comparison of Antimicrobial Effect of Four Types of 62% Alcohol Gel Hand Hygiene Method

^*By one-way ANOVA test with Scheffe post-hoc analysis; Difference was significant between a and b, c, d (p<.001) and between b and d (p=.026).

Table 3

Antimicrobial Effect of 62% Alcohol Gels with Different Amount, Rubbing Time, and Drying Time

^*By student t-test.

Table 1 Baseline and Residual Bacterial Density among Four Types of 62% Alcohol Gel Hand Hygiene Method

^*By one-way ANOVA test; ^†Difference was statistically significant between a and b, c, d by Scheffe post-hoc analysis.

Table 2 Comparison of Antimicrobial Effect of Four Types of 62% Alcohol Gel Hand Hygiene Method

^*By one-way ANOVA test with Scheffe post-hoc analysis; Difference was significant between a and b, c, d (p<.001) and between b and d (p=.026).

Table 3 Antimicrobial Effect of 62% Alcohol Gels with Different Amount, Rubbing Time, and Drying Time

^*By student t-test.